green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Rivers v. Rosenthal & Company
But see Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Goldman, 593 F.2d 129 , 133 n.7 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 76 , 62 L.Ed.2d 50 (1979) (noting summarily in dictum that "(s)uch actions are well recognized."); Hirk v. Agri-Research Council, Inc., 561 F.2d 96 , 103 & n.8 (7th Cir. 1977) (similar perfunctory assertion).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Rivers v. Rosenthal & Co.
But see Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Goldman, 593 F.2d 129 , 133 n.7 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 76 , 62 L.Ed.2d 50 (1979) (noting summarily in dictum that “[s]uch actions are well recognized.”); Hirk v. Agri-Research Council, Inc., 561 F.2d 96 , 103 & n.8 (7th Cir. 1977) (similar perfunctory assertion).
discussed
Cited "see"
H.H. Robertson Company v. V.S. Dicarlo General Contractors, Inc.
See id. 6 In Missouri, the creditor's bill enables a judgment creditor to "trace the value of the goods and services rendered to an empty-shell corporation to the parties behind such a corporation who have received and benefited from the property or services." Shockley v. Harry Sander Realty Co., 771 S.W.2d 922, 925 (Mo.Ct.App.1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Southern Pines Associates v. United States
See Union Electric Co. v. EPA, 593 F.2d 299, 304 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 839 , 100 S.Ct. 76 , 62 L.Ed.2d 50 (1979); Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. v. EPA, 554 F.2d 885 (8th Cir.1977). 12 CERCLA allows the EPA to order that a site be cleaned up prior to bringing suit. 42 U.S.C.
cited
Cited "see"
Southern Pines Associates v. United States
See Union Electric Co. v. EPA, 593 F.2d 299, 304 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 839 , 100 S.Ct. 76 , 62 L.Ed.2d 50 (1979); Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. v. EPA, 554 F.2d 885 (8th Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Farmland Industries v. Frazier-Parrott Commodities, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Goldman, 593 F.2d 129, 133-34 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 76 , 62 L.Ed.2d 50 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Farmland Industries v. Frazier-Parrott Commodities, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Goldman, 593 F.2d 129, 133-34 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 76 , 62 L.Ed.2d 50 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
James L. Osborn, Jr. v. E.F. Hutton & Company, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.
See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Goldman, 593 F.2d 129, 133-34 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 76 , 62 L.Ed.2d 50 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kirkland v. EF Hutton and Co., Inc.
See, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Goldman, 593 F.2d 129 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 76 , 62 L.Ed.2d 50 (1979); Rolf v. Blyth, Eastman Dillon & Co., 424 F.Supp. 1021 (S.D.N.Y. 1977), aff’d, 570 F.2d 38 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1039 , 99 S.Ct. 642 , 58 L.Ed.2d 698 (1978) (circuit court did not reach issue of implied right of action); Shull v. Dain, Kalman & Quail, Inc., 561 F.2d 152 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1281 , 55 L.Ed.2d 792 (1978); Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc., 554 F.2d 790 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, …
cited
Cited "see"
Mccluskey v. Board Of Education Of Rogers
See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Goldman, 593 F.2d 129, 131 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 76 , 62 L.Ed.2d 50 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
McCcuskey v. Board of Education of Rogers, Arkansas
See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Goldman, 593 F.2d 129, 131 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 76 , 62 L.Ed.2d 50 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Khalid Bin Alwaleed Foundation v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.
Compare Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Goldman, 593 F.2d 129 , 133 n. 7 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 76 , 62 L.Ed.2d 50 (1979) (investor may maintain an action against his broker for violations of anti-fraud provisions of the CEA) (dictum) with Rivers v. Rosenthal & Co., 634 F.2d 774 (5th Cir.1980), vacated, 456 U.S. 968 , 102 S.Ct. 2228 , 72 L.Ed.2d 841 (1982) (no private right of action available).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Dow Chemical Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
See also Union Electric Co. v. EPA, 593 F.2d 299 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 839 , 100 S.Ct. 76 , 62 L.Ed.2d 50 (1979). 12 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thompson v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co.
Compare Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Goldman, 593 F.2d 129 (8th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 76 , 62 L.Ed.2d 50 (1980) and Buttrey v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 410 F.2d 135 (7th Cir.) cert. denied, 396 U.S. 838 , 90 S.Ct. 98 , 24 L.Ed.2d 88 (1969) (private cause of action exists where accompanied by allegations of fraud) with Jablon v. Dean Witter & Co., 614 F.2d 677 (9th Cir. 1980) (no implied private right of action for violation of “know your customer” and “suitability” rules).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Sherry v. Diercks
See, e.g., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Goldman, 593 F.2d 129, 134 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 62 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matanuska Maid, Inc. v. State
(2×)
See also Union Electric Co. v. EPA, 593 F.2d 299, 306 (8th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 839 , 100 S.Ct. 76 , 62 L.Ed.2d 50 (1979); Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Engman, 527 F.2d 1115, 1118-19 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, sub nom.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harris
v.
H. Schuldt Reederei
v.
H. Schuldt Reederei
No. 78-1851.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1979.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.