green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
9.4 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1988 ·
…where the injury and cause thereof are subtler and more complicated than in the normal malpractice case, it seems particularly inappropriate to determine as a matter of law what the plaintiff should have known
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
John Barren, an Incompetent, by His Guardian, Henrietta Barren v. United States
(2×)
where the injury and cause thereof are subtler and more complicated than in the normal malpractice case, it seems particularly inappropriate to determine as a matter of law what the plaintiff should have known
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Bucey
charge of conspiracy is sufficient if it follows the statutory language and contains an adequate statement of an overt act to effectuate the object of the conspiracy, and the requisite overt act need not be criminal in itself.
cited
Cited "see"
Haggart v. Cho
See Greenberg v. McCabe, 453 F.Supp. 765, 772 (1978), affirmed, 594 F.2d 854 (3d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 79 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blanton v. Housing Authority
(2×)
See Rodriguez de Quinonez v. Perez, 596 F.2d 486 [1st Cir.1978], cert. den., 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 [1979]; Burkhart v. Randles, 764 F.2d 1196, 1201 [6th Cir.1985]; McGhee v. Draper, supra . (4) The Iowa Supreme Court, relying on Fifth Circuit jurisprudence in Rosenstein, supra note 3 , holds that a discharged nontenured public employee must request a name-clearing hearing to establish a § 1983 liberty interest claim.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anna Irene Martinez
See Model Penal Code Sec. 5.03 comment (Official Draft and Revised Comments 1985). 6 As this court has indicated in United States v. Watson, 594 F.2d 1330, 1340 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979), 7 Where large quantities of narcotics are being distributed, each major buyer may be presumed to know that he is part of a wide-ranging venture, the success of which depends on performance by others whose identity he may not even know. 8 See also Blumenthal v. United States, 332 U.S. 539, 559 , 68 S.Ct. 248, 257 , 92 L.Ed. 154 (1947).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gabriel Alvarez, Gustavo Holguin, Leovigilda Rivera, Humberto Olivares Castrellon and Oneyda Zambrana
(2×)
United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971, 1032 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981) (emphasis supplied), ce rt. denied, 457 U.S. 1136 , 102 S.Ct. 2965 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1354 (1982); see United States v. Watson, 594 F.2d 1330 , 1342 n. 14 (10th Cir.) (defendant could be charged with telephone facilitation if underlying distribution was by either himself or third party), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles H. Grier and Isaac Harper
It is sufficient if a defendant’s use of a telephone to facilitate the possession or distribution of controlled substances facilitates either his own or another person’s possession or distribution.’ United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971, 1032 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981) (emphasis supplied), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1136 [ 102 S.Ct. 2965 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1354 ] (1982); see United States v. Watson, 594 F.2d 1330 , 1342 n. 14 (10th Cir.) (defendant could be charged with telephone facilitation if underlying distribution was by either himself or third party), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 [ 100 S.Ct. 78 …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Luis Anthony Rivera
(2×)
See United States v. Watson, 594 F.2d 1330, 1341 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William A. Kilpatrick, Declan J. O'donnell, Sheila C. Lerner, the Bank of Nova Scotia, Michael Alberga, C.S. Gill, and C.M. Smith
(2×)
See United States v. Watson, 594 F.2d 1330, 1341 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
DeMartino v. Albert Einstein Medical Center
See, Greenberg v. McCabe, 453 F.Supp. 765 (E.D.Pa.1978), aff’d. 594 F.2d 854 (3d Cir.1979), cert. den., McCabe v. Greenberg, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 79 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979). 15 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Timothy Smith
See United States v. Watson, 594 F.2d 1330, 1335 (10th Cir. 1979) (“[F]amiliarity with another’s voice may be acquired either before or after the particular speaking which is the subject of the identification.”) (citing Fed.R.Evid. 901(b)(5)), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mark Prieskorn
(2×)
See United States v. Mancillas, supra, 580 F.2d at 1307 ; accord, United States v. Watson, 594 F.2d 1330, 1337 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979); cf. United States v. Martin, 599 F.2d 880, 888-89 (9th Cir.) (person who attempts to purchase small amount of drug for personal use from a member of a conspiracy to sell that drug cannot be convicted by that act alone of facilitation of a conspiracy under 21 U.S.C. § 843 (b)), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2407 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Rose v. Nashua Board of Education
See Rodriguez de Quinonez v. Perez, 596 F.2d 486 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979); Levesque v. State of Maine, 587 F.2d 78 (1st Cir. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dressler v. Jenne
“Because it is provided simply to cleanse the reputation of the claimant, the hearing need not take place prior to his termination or to the publication of related information adverse to his interests.” Campbell v. Pierce County, Georgia, at 1345; see also Rodriguez de Quinonez v. Perez, 596 F.2d 486 (1st Cir.) cert, denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979) (pre-termination hearing not required but post-termination hearing necessary in case involving liberty interest); White v. Thomas, 660 F.2d 680 (5th Cir.1981) cert, denied 455 U.S. 1027 , 102 S.Ct. 1731 , 72 L.Ed.2d 14…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Isaac D. Milton
See also United States v. Watson, 594 F.2d 1330, 1343 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Foster v. Jackson County, Fla.
See also, Rodriguez de Quinonez v. Perez, 596 F.2d 486 (1st Cir.) cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979) (pretermination hearing not required but post-termination hearing necessary in case involving liberty interest); White v. Thomas, 660 F.2d 680 (5th Cir.1981) ce rt. denied 455 U.S. 1027 , 102 S.Ct. 1731 , 72 L.Ed.2d 148 (1982) (post-termination hearing proper remedy for employee deprived of liberty interest during termination); In re Selcraig, 705 F.2d 789 (5th Cir.1983) (state need only inform stigmatized employee that the opportunity to clear his name exists upon…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Butler v. United States
See Fed.R.Evid. 901(b)(5); see also United States v. Watson, 594 F.2d 1330, 1335 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979); United States v. Bonanno, 487 F.2d 654, 659 (2d Cir.1973); United States v. Whitaker, 372 F.Supp. 154, 165 (M.D.Pa.), aff'd, 503 F.2d 1400 (3d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1113 , 95 S.Ct. 789 , 42 L.Ed.2d 810 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bunce v. Parkside Lodge of Columbus
Center, 142 Misc.2d 292, 296 [ 537 N.Y.S.2d 446, 448-449 ]; Hoopes v. Hammargren, 102 Nev. 425 , 725 P.2d 238 ; Wall v. Noble, 705 S.W.2d 727 [Tex.App.]; Adams, Sex with Patients: Is it Malpractice?, 23 Trial 58 [June 1987]; see also, Greenberg v. McCabe, 453 F.Supp. 765 , affd. [3 Cir.] 594 F.2d 854 , cert. denied 444 U.S. 840 [ 100 S.Ct. 78 , 79, 62 L.Ed.2d 51 ] * * *).” Stevenson v. Goomar (1989), 148 A.D.2d 217, 226 , 544 N.Y.S.2d 690, 696 , Levine, J., dissenting.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Peck
See also International Union, UAW v. National Caucus of Labor Comm., 466 F.Supp. 564, 570 (S.D.N.Y.1979), aff'd, 607 F.2d 996 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 839 , 100 S.Ct. 77 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jackie Dee Willis
See, e.g., United States v. Watson, 594 F.2d 1330, 1343 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donald F. Buxton v. City of Plant City, Florida, Troy E. Surrency, Individually, Troy E. Surrency, in His Official Capacity
See also, Rodriguez de Quinonez v. Perez, 596 F.2d 486 (1st Cir.) cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979) (pre-termination hearing not required but post-termination hearing necessary in case involving liberty interest); White v. Thomas, 660 F.2d 680 (5th Cir.1981) cert. denied 455 U.S. 1027 , 102 S.Ct. 1731 , 72 L.Ed.2d 148 (1982) (post-termination hearing proper remedy for employee deprived of liberty interest during termination); In re Selcraig, 705 F.2d 789 (5th Cir.1983) (state need only inform stigmatized employee that the opportunity to clear his name exists upon…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fraternal Order Of Police, Lodge No. 5 v. Kevin M. Tucker
See, e.g., Rodriguez de Quinonez v. Perez, 596 F.2d 486, 490 (1st Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979) ("It is true that, strictly read, the statute [under which the plaintiff was removed from office] does not require an official determination or charge of dishonesty, but only a finding that there is sufficient 'evidence' of dishonesty to warrant invoking the statute.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 5 v. Tucker
See, e.g., Rodriguez de Quinonez v. Perez, 596 F.2d 486, 490 (1st Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979) (“It is true that, strictly read, the statute [under which the plaintiff was removed from office] does not require an official determination or charge of dishonesty, but only a finding that there is sufficient ‘evidence’ of dishonesty to warrant invoking the statute.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bernard J. McIntyre
See also United States v. Watson, 594 F.2d 1330, 1335 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jane Doe v. United States Department of Justice
(2×)
See, e.g., Rodriguez de Quihonez v. Perez, 596 F.2d 486, 488-89 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979); Beitzell v. Jeffrey, 643 F.2d 870, 878 (1st Cir.1981); Huntley v. Community School Bd., 543 F.2d 979, 984-86 (2nd Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 929 , 97 S.Ct. 1547 , 51 L.Ed.2d 773 (1977); McKnight v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transp.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dorothy Jefferson
See also United States v. Watson, 594 F.2d 1330, 1342-43 (10th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Brown v. United States, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Leavitt
v.
Florida
v.
Florida
No. 78-1860.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1979.
Published
Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.