green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.4 score
“monetary awards will be upheld as long as such awards bear a logical relationship to the evidence or as long as there is a rational basis therefor.”
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 38 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
McHugh Inc. v. Soldo Const. Co., Inc.
monetary awards will be upheld as long as such awards bear a logical relationship to the evidence or as long as there is a rational basis therefor.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Grant v. Dalsheim
United States v. Velez, 652 F.2d 258, 262 (2d Cir. 1981) (“a supplemental charge is not defective where it responds adequately to the jury’s request for clarification"); United States v. Viserto, 596 F.2d 531, 539 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 841 , 100 S.Ct. 80 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 *1387 (1979); Whiting v. United States, 321 F.2d 72 , 75 n.3 (1st Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 884 , 84 S.Ct. 158 , 11 L.Ed.2d 114 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Herder
(2×)
See United States v. Viserto, 596 F.2d 531, 539 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 841 , 100 S.Ct. 80 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ambrose
See United States v. Brighton Building & Maintenance Co., 598 F.2d 1101, 1105 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 840[, 100 S.Ct. 79 , 80, 62 L.Ed.2d 52 ] (1979) (criminal antitrust prosecution: “Defendants [are] not entitled to an instruction which [includes] the ... phrase [that the defendant knowingly did an act which the law forbids, purposely intending to violate the law]. ‘A requirement of proof not only of this knowledge of likely effects, but also of a conscious desire to bring them to fruition or to violate the law would seem, particularly in such a context, both unnecessaril…
discussed
Cited "see"
Diazo Service Co. v. Redmond (In Re Diazo Service Co.)
See Del Rio Distrib., Inc. v. Adolph Coors Co., 589 F.2d 176 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 80 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979) (affirmed trial court’s denial of a new trial based on a change in the applicable legal standard during the trial due to a Supreme Court decision.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gentile v. County Of Suffolk
See United States v. Viserto, 596 F.2d 531, 536-37 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 841 , 100 S.Ct. 80 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979); McKinney v. Galvin, 701 F.2d 584 , 586 n. 5 (6th Cir.1983); United States v. Kerley, 643 F.2d 299, 300-01 (5th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gentile v. County of Suffolk
See United States v. Viserto, 596 F.2d 531, 536-37 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 841 , 100 S.Ct. 80 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979); McKinney v. Galvin, 701 F.2d 584 , 586 n. 5 (6th Cir.1983); United States v. Kerley, 643 F.2d 299, 300-01 (5th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alfredo Diaz, Eradio Perez, and Jose Alfanso Riano
See United States v. Viserto, 596 F.2d 531, 536 (2d Cir.) (relevance of evidence “not so farfetched as to make its admission an abuse of discretion”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 841 , 100 S.Ct. 80 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979); cf. Loughan v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 749 F.2d 1519, 1523 (11th Cir.1985) (conflicting testimony goes to weight of evidence and not admissibility); Carter v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc., 716 F.2d 344, 348 (5th Cir.1983) (evidence need not be disposi-tive of an issue to be relevant) (citing Fed.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Portac, Inc., United States of America v. Howard L. Wolf
See *1297 United States v. Roberts, 618 F.2d 530, 535 (9th Cir.1980), United States v. Brighton Bldg. & Maintenance Co., 598 F.2d 1101 , 1109 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 80 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Loretangeli v. Critelli
See Gabauer v. Woodcock, 594 F.2d 662, 668 (8th Cir.) (plaintiffs may not invoke section as discovery tool to investigate official uses of funds), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 841 , 100 S.Ct. 80 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Loretangeli v. Critelli
See Gabauer v. Woodcock, 594 F.2d 662, 668 (8th Cir.) (plaintiffs may not invoke section as discovery tool to investigate official uses of funds), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 841 , 100 S.Ct. 80 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Martinez
Sanfilippo testified that in approximately 125 arrests that he made in the course of narcotics investigations, 75-80% of the arrestees carried loaded firearms; accord United States v. Viserto, 596 F.2d 531, 537 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 841 , 100 S.Ct. 80 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
John Mallick v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
See Gabauer v. Woodcock, 594 F.2d 662, 665 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 841 , 100 S.Ct. 80 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979); Landry v. Sabine Indep.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. v. United States
See Gabauer v. Woodcock, 425 F.Supp. 1, 3 (E.D.Mo.1976), aff'd in part and rev’d in part on other grounds, 594 F.2d 662 (8th Cir.), cert, denied, 444 U.S. 841 , 100 S.Ct. 80 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979); Abramson v. Penwood Inv.
discussed
Cited "see"
Coastal States Marketing, Inc. And Valero Energy Corporation, Cross-Appellees v. Nelson Bunker Hunt, Cross-Appellants
Fed.R.Civ.P. 16 provides that a pretrial order “when entered controls the subsequent course of the action, unless modified at trial to prevent injustice.” The trial judge has “broad discretion in determining whether or not a pretrial order should be modified or amended.” United States v. Texas, 680 F.2d 356, 370 (5th Cir.1982); accord Del Rio Distributing, Inc. v. Adolph Coors Co., 589 F.2d 176, 178 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 80 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1980). 35 Nevertheless, we have recognized that the trial court has not only the right but the duty to relieve a p…
discussed
Cited "see"
Morrissey v. Curran
Gurton v. Arons, 339 F.2d 371, 375 (2d Cir. 1964); see Gabauer v. Woodcock, 594 F.2d 662 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 841 , 100 S.Ct. 80 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979); Vestal v. Hoffa, 451 F.2d 706, 709 (6th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 934 , 92 S.Ct. 1768 , 32 L.Ed.2d 135 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Morrissey v. Curran
Gurton v. Arons, 339 F.2d 371, 375 (2d Cir. 1964); see Gabauer v. Woodcock, 594 F.2d 662 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 841 , 100 S.Ct. 80 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979); Vestal v. Hoffa, 451 F.2d 706, 709 (6th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 934 , 92 S.Ct. 1768 , 32 L.Ed.2d 135 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Grand Rapids Die Casting Corp. v. Local Union No. 159, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers
See Iowa Beef Processors, Inc. v. Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, AFL-CIO, 597 F.2d 1138 (8th Cir. 1979), cert. denied 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 79 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 ; Fabricut, Inc. v. Tulsa General Drivers, Warehousemen and Helpers, Local 523, 597 F.2d 227 (10th Cir. 1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Medical Laboratory Automation, Inc. v. Labcon, Inc.
See Centsable Products, Inc. v. Lemelson, 591 F.2d 400 (7th Cir.) cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 79 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Cowley v. Braden Industries
See Del Rio Distributing, Inc. v. Adolph Coors Co., 589 F.2d 176 (5th Cir.), Cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 100 S.Ct. 80 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dale Murray, Paul Leahey, Ronald Vanderbosch, Lawrence Tower, and Linton Sherlock
(2×)
See United States v. Viserto, 596 F.2d 531, 538-39 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 841 , 100 S.Ct. 80 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979); United States v. UCO Oil Co., supra, 546 F.2d at 835-38 ; United States v. Tanner, 471 F.2d 128, 138-39 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 269 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972); United States v. Lennon, 246 F.2d 24 , 27 & n.4 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 836 , 78 S.Ct. 60 , 2 L.Ed.2d 48 (1957).
cited
Cited "see"
Cowley v. Braden Industries, Inc.
See Del Rio Distributing, Inc. v. Adolph Coors Co., 589 F.2d 176 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 100 S.Ct. 80 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wackenhut Corp. v. International Union, United Plant Guard Workers
Because an arbitrator “does not sit to dispense his own brand of industrial justice” and “is confined to interpretation and application of the collective bargaining agreement,” id. at 597 , 80 S.Ct. at 1361 , vacatur is required where an arbitrator “exceed[s] the limits of his contractual authority” or where the award “is not derived in some rational way” from the CBA Local 814, Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters v. Sotheby’s, Inc., 665 F.Supp. 1089, 1092 (S.D.N.Y.1987)(quoting American Fed’n of Television and Radio Artists v. Benton & Bowles, Inc., 627 F.Supp. 682, 686 (S.D.N.Y.1986)…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Henry Sivils (90-6366) Jerry Stokes (90-6375) William Dillard (90-6376) and Sherrill Jordan (90-6420)
Id. at 993; United States v. Aguon, 851 F.2d 1158, 1171 (9th Cir.1988) (en banc); United States v. Levesque, 681 F.2d 75, 80 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1089 , 103 S.Ct. 574 , 74 L.Ed.2d 936 (1982); see also United States v. Viserto, 596 F.2d 531, 540 (2d Cir.) (finding waiver of strict application of Rule 24(c)), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 841 , 100 S.Ct. 80 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979). 1 Fourteen jurors were selected at the outset of the proceedings to hear the evidence.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Andrews
Such motions should be granted, however, “only if the targeted allegations are clearly not relevant to the charge and are inflammatory and prejudicial.” United States v. Chaverra-Cardona, 667 F.Supp. *1519 609, 611 (N.D.Ill.1987) (emphasis added) (citing 1 Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure: Criminal 2d § 127, at 425-27 (1982)); see also United States v. Brighton Bldg. & Maintenance Co., 435 F.Supp. 222, 230-31 (N.D.Ill.1977), aff'd, 598 F.2d 1101 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 79 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John Morrell & Company v. Local Union 304a of the United Food and Commercial Workers, Afl-Cio United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio and Clc Dennis Foster, Individually and in His Capacity as President of Local 304a James R. Lyons, Individually and in His Capacity as Business Representative and Corresponding Secretary of Local 304a John Doe and Other Persons Unknown, John Morrell & Company, a Corporation v. Local Union 304a of the United Food and Commercial Workers, Afl-Cio and Clc United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio and Clc
See also Iowa Beef Processors v. Amalgamated Meat Cutters, 597 F.2d 1138 , 1144 (8th Cir.) (examined language, external circumstances, and policy considerations to determine whether the right had been waived), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 79 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979). 23 Thus, we must next decide whether the no-strike clause is "ambiguous" in the sense that it is reasonably susceptible of the meaning proposed by Morrell, namely, that the Unions, in clear and unmistakable terms, waived their right to engage in sympathy strikes.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John Morrell & Co. v. Local Union 304A of the United Food & Commercial Workers
See also Iowa Beef Processors v. Amalgamated Meat Cutters, 597 F.2d 1138 , 1144 (8th Cir.) (examined language, external circumstances, and policy considerations to determine whether the right had been waived), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 79 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Town of East Hartford v. East Hartford Municipal Employees Union, Inc.
See, e.g., Detroit Coil Co. v. International Assn. of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, Lodge 82, 594 F.2d 575 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S. Ct. 79 , 62 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
American Fabrics Company v. United Textile Workers of America
See, e.g., Detroit Coil Co. v. International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, Lodge #82, 594 F.2d 575 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S. Ct. 79 , 62 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Chaverra-Cardona
See also United States v. Brighton Building & Maintenance Co., 435 F.Supp. 222, 230-31 (N.D.Ill.1977), aff'd, 598 F.2d 1101 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 79 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Smith Grading and Paving, Inc. And Herbert P. Lee, Iii, United States of America v. Dellinger, Inc. And Theodore C. Dellinger
See also United States v. Brighton Building, 598 F.2d 1101 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 79 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Henry Daniel Stull, Sr., Henry Daniel Stull, Jr., and Patricia Mooradian
See also United States v. Viserto, 596 F.2d 531, 538 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 841 , 100 S.Ct. 80 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979); United States v. Easom, 569 F.2d 457, 459 . n. 1 (8th Cir.1978). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Engelhard Minerals & Chemicals Corp. v. Anglo-American Clays Corp.
See also Centsable Products, Inc. v. Lemelson, 591 F.2d 400, 403 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 79 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979); Haloro, Inc. v. Owens-Fiberglas Corp., 288 F.2d 148, 149 (D.C.Cir.1961); Continental Can Co. v. Anchor Hocking Glass Corp., 362 F.2d 123, 127 (7th Cir.19.66); A.E.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sadik Xheka and Beha Xheka
Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(1)(A); see also United States v. Brighton Building & Maintenance Co., 598 F.2d 1101, 1108 (7th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 79 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William C. Howard v. V. A. Gonzales
See, e. g., United States v. Brighton Building Maintenance Co., 598 F.2d 1101 , 1108 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 80 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1969); United States v. Mosley, 555 F.2d 191, 193 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 851 , 98 S.Ct. 163 , 54 L.Ed.2d 120 (1977); National Land & Investment Co. v. Specter, 428 F.2d 91, 97 (3d Cir. 1970); Gollaher v. United States, 419 F.2d 520, 523 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 960 , 90 S.Ct. 434 , 24 L.Ed.2d 424 (1979); 8 J.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Williams
See, e. g., United States v. Viserto, 596 F.2d 531, 538 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 841 , 100 S.Ct. 80 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Singh
See also United States v. Viserto, 596 F.2d 531, 537 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 841 , 100 S.Ct. 80 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979); United States v. Fuentes, 563 F.2d 527, 531 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 959 , 98 S.Ct. 491 , 54 L.Ed.2d 320 (1977); and United States v. Chiarizio, 525 F.2d 289, 293 (2d Cir. 1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brighton Building & Maintenance Co.
v.
United States and Palumbo Excavating Co. v. United States
v.
United States and Palumbo Excavating Co. v. United States
No. 78-1872; No. 79-111.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1979.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: New Jersey Superior Court App … (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 598 F. 2d 1101.