green
Positive treatment
6.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Union Leader Corp. v. City of Nashua
See Brown v. Minter, 254 S.E.2d 326, 327 (Ga.) (decided under state open records act), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 844 (1979); cf. Dept. of Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352, 374 (1976) (concluding that FOIA provision for redaction of some material “was added explicitly to authorize in camera inspection”); State v. Gagne, 136 N.H. 101, 105 , 612 A.2d 899, 901 (1992) (in camera review used as a step between partial disclosure and total nondisclosure of confidential records).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Robbinsdale Independent School District No. 281
See Brody v. Montalbano, 87 Cal.App.3d 725 , 151 Cal.Rptr. 206, 211 (1978) (letters from parents to school board concerning school principal are privileged), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 844 , 100 S.Ct. 87 , 62 L.Ed.2d 57 (1979); Swenson-Davis .v.
cited
Cited "see"
Kelley v. Bonney
See Brody v.Montalbcmo, 87 Cal. App. 3d 725 , 151 Cal. Rptr. 206 (1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 844 , 100 S. Ct. 87 , 62 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Herring
See United States v. Avarello, 592 F.2d 1339 , 1351 n. 21 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 844 , 100 S.Ct. 87 , 62 L.Ed.2d 57 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Herring
See United States v. Avarello, 592 F.2d 1339 , 1351 n. 21 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 844 , 100 S.Ct. 87 , 62 L.Ed.2d 57 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Morris
See United States v. Kitchin, 592 F.2d 900, 903 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 843 , 100 S.Ct. 86 , 62 L.Ed.2d 56 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Osei-Afriyie v. Medical College of Pennsylvania
See United States v. Schreiber, 599 F.2d 534, 536 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 843 , 100 S.Ct. 86 , 62 L.Ed.2d 56 (1979). 30 Plain errors are those errors that "seriously affect the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings." United States v. Atkinson, 297 U.S. 157, 160 , 56 S.Ct. 391, 392 , 80 L.Ed. 555 (1936).
cited
Cited "see"
Osei-Afriyie v. Medical College of Pennsylvania
See United States v. Schreiber, 599 F.2d 534, 536 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 843 , 100 S.Ct. 86 , 62 L.Ed.2d 56 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Financial Corp. of America v. Wilburn
Code, § 47.) “[T]he obvious purpose of section 47 [is] to afford litigants the utmost freedom of access to the courts to secure and defend their rights without fear of being harassed by actions for defamation.” (Albertson v. Raboff (1956) 46 Cal.2d 375, 380 [ 295 P.2d 405 ].) Albertson established that this privilege was also a defense to a claim of disparagement of title. {Id., at pp. 378-379.) As more fully explained in Thornton v. Rhoden (1966) 245 Cal.App.2d 80, 99 [ 53 Cal.Rptr. 706 , 23 A.L.R.3d 1152 ]: “The salutary purpose of the privilege should not be frustrated by putting a n…
discussed
Cited "see"
Board of Education of Plainfield Community Consolidated School District No. 202 v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board
(2×)
Administrative rules have the force and effect of law and must be construed under the same standards which govern statutory construction. ( DeGrazio v. Civil Service Com. (1964), 31 Ill.2d 482, 485 , 202 N.E.2d 522, 524 ; see generally Northern Illinois Automobile Wreckers & Rebuilders Association v. Dixon (1979), 75 Ill.2d 53 , 387 N.E.2d 320 , cert. denied (1979), 444 U.S. 844 , 62 L.Ed.2d 57 , 100 S.Ct. 87 ; Foley v. Civil Service Com. (1980), 89 Ill.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Martinez
See United States v. Kitchin, 592 F.2d 900 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 843 , 100 S.Ct. 86 , 62 L.Ed.2d 56 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. King
See United States v. Avarello, 592 F.2d 1339, 1346 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 844 , 100 S. Ct. 87 , 62 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,017 Carl R. Duncan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
Corp. v. Armco Steel Corp., 559 F.2d 250 (5th Cir. 1977) (denial); Woods v. Covington County Bank, 537 F.2d 804 (5th Cir. 1976) (grant); In re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation, 530 F.2d 83 (5th Cir. 1976) (denial); United States v. Garcia, 517 F.2d 272 (5th Cir. 1975) (grant); Draganescu v. First National Bank of Hollywood, 502 F.2d 550 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 929 , 95 S.Ct. 1655 , 44 L.Ed.2d 86 (1975) (grant); Uniweld Products, Inc. v. Union Carbide Corp., 385 F.2d 992 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 921 , 88 S.Ct. 853 , 19 L.Ed.2d 980 (1968) (denial); Tomlin…
discussed
Cited "see"
FIRST NAT'L BANK OF CHICAGO v. Edgeworth
(2×)
App. 3d 739, 744 , 365 N.E.2d 1028 , and cases there cited.) “Under Illinois law, intent is to be ascertained, if possible, from the language of the instrument itself.” (Ford v. Newman (1979), 77 Ill. 2d 335, 338-39 , 396 N.E.2d 539 ; see Stuart v. Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Co. (1977), 68 Ill. 2d 502, 528 , 369 N.E.2d 1262 , cert. denied (1979), 444 U.S. 844 , 62 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Dennis Swinehart
(2×)
See United States v. Schreiber, 599 F.2d 534 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 100 S.Ct. 86 , 62 L.Ed.2d 56 , (1979), United States v. Bazzano, 570 F.2d 1120, 1128 (3d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 917 , 98 S.Ct. 2261 , 56 L.Ed.2d 757 (1978); United States v. Garcia, 544 F.2d 681 , 684 n.l (3d Cir. 1976). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ideal Steel Supply Corp. v. Joseph Anza, Vincent Anza, and National Steel Supply, Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Davila, 592 F.2d 1261, 1263 (5th Cir.) (upholding § 1343 wire fraud conviction of a defendant who used Western Union wire transfers to send money between San Antonio and McAllen, Texas, which were routed through Middletown, Virginia), reh’g denied, 597 F.2d 283 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 843 , 100 S.Ct. 85 , 62 L.Ed.2d 56 (1979); see also United States v. Blassingame, 427 F.2d 329, 330 (2d Cir.1970) (defendant need not know that its wire communication travels through interstate commerce for § 1343 to be applicable), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 945 , 91 S.Ct. 1629 , 29 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baca v. Moreno Valley Unified School District
See Frisk v. Merrihew, 42 Cal.App.3d 319, 323-324 , 116 Cal.Rptr. 781, 783 (1974) (school board meetings are official proceedings within the meaning of California Civil Code section 47(b)(3)); see also Brody v. Montalbano, 87 Cal. App.3d 725, 731-732 , 151 Cal.Rptr. 206, 211 (1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 844 , 100 S.Ct. 87 , 62 L.Ed.2d 57 (1979) (absolute privilege applies to parents’ communication with school board which is intended to prompt official action by board regarding school administrator’s conduct); Martin v. Kearney, 51 Cal.App.3d 309, 311 , 124 Cal.Rptr. 281, 282 (1975) (abso…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baca v. Moreno Valley Unified School Dist.
The people insist on remaining informed so that they may retain control over the instruments they have created." (Govt.Code, § 54950, emphasis added.) [17] See Frisk v. Merrihew, 42 Cal.App.3d 319, 323-324 , 116 Cal.Rptr. 781, 783 (1974) (school board meetings are official proceedings within the meaning of California Civil Code section 47(b)(3)); see also Brody v. Montalbano, 87 Cal. App.3d 725, 731-732 , 151 Cal.Rptr. 206, 211 (1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 844 , 100 S.Ct. 87 , 62 L.Ed.2d 57 (1979) (absolute privilege applies to parents' communication with school board which is intended to p…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Microsoft Corp. v. A-Tech Corp.
Business Machines, 673 F.2d 1045, 1055 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1130 , 105 S.Ct. 2664 , 86 L.Ed.2d 280 (1982); see also, Brody v. Montalbano, 87 *315 Cal.App.3d 725, 738, 151 Cal.Rptr. 206, 215-216 (1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 844 , 100 S.Ct. 87 , 62 L.Ed.2d 57 (1979); Bledsoe v. Watson, 30 Cal.App.3d 105, 110 , 106 Cal. Rptr. 197, 200 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mauricio Londono-Villa
See, e.g., United States v. Eisenberg, 596 F.2d 522, 526 (2d Cir.) (under 18 U.S.C. § 2314 , knowledge that securities transported in interstate commerce not necessary), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 843 , 100 S.Ct. 85 , 62 L.Ed.2d 56 (1979); United States v. Green, 523 F.2d 229, 233-34 (2d Cir.1975) (under 18 U.S.C. § 659 , “knowledge of interstate or foreign character of the goods” not required), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1074 , 96 S.Ct. 858 , 47 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976); see also United States v. Hattaway, 740 F.2d 1419, 1427 (7th Cir.) (collecting cases), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 448 ,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. H. Wailen York
See, e.g., United States v. Schreiber, 599 F.2d 534, 535-36 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 843 , 100 S.Ct. 86 , 62 L.Ed.2d 56 (1979); cf. Conforte, 624 F.2d at 880 (“[W]e leave open here the question whether timeliness may be disregarded in exceptional circumstances.”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Annette Cox v. American Cast Iron Pipe Company
See Woods, 537 F.2d at 813 & n. 12; see also United States v. Kitchin, 592 F.2d 900, 903 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 843 , 100 S.Ct. 86 , 62 L.Ed.2d 56 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cox v. American Cast Iron Pipe Co.
See Woods, 537 F.2d at 813 & n. 12; see also United States v. Kitchin, 592 F.2d 900, 903 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 843 , 100 S.Ct. 86 , 62 L.Ed.2d 56 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Alper v. Meyer (In Re Ram Manufacturing, Inc.)
See, e.g., U.S. v. Kitchin, 592 F.2d 900 (5th Cir.1979) cert. den. 444 U.S. 843 , 100 S.Ct. 86 , 62 L.Ed.2d 56 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sherwood Webster v. Sun Company, Inc. Webster-Heise Corporation v. Sun Company, Inc.
(2×)
See also Brody v. Montalbano, 87 Cal.App.3d 725, 733 , 151 Cal.Rptr. 206, 211 (1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 844 , 100 S.Ct. 87 , 62 L.Ed.2d 57 (1979) 12 Appellees argue that the scope of this privilege should reflect precisely the immunity afforded legislators under the speech or debate clause of the Constitution.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tocco
See, e.g., United States v. Kitchin, 592 F.2d 900, 904 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 843 , 100 S.Ct. 86 , 62 L.Ed.2d 56 (1979); Hull v. Celanese Corp., 513 F.2d 568, 572 (2d Cir. 1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Webster v. Sun Co., Inc.
See, e.g., Brody v. Montalbano, 87 Cal.App.3d 725 , 151 Cal.Rptr. 206, 211 (1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 844 , 100 S.Ct. 87 , 62 L.Ed.2d 57 (1979) (volunteered letter that initiated official inquiry privileged as “communication preliminary to a proceeding”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. George Zappola and Robert Melli
See also United States v. Eisenberg, 596 F.2d 522, 527 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 843 , 100 S.Ct. 85 , 62 L.Ed.2d 56 (1979); United States v. Rosenblatt, 554 F.2d 36 (2d Cir. 1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anthony Provenzano, Stephen Andretta, and Thomas Andretta
See, e. g., United States v. Kitchin, 592 F.2d 900, 904 (5th Cir.) (per curiam) (adopting district court’s findings and conclusions), cer t. denied, 444 U.S. 843 , 100 S.Ct. 86 , 62 L.Ed.2d 56 (1979); cf. American Roller Co. v. Budinger, 513 F.3d 982, 984 (3d Cir. 1975) (civil case); Arkansas v. Dean Foods Products Co., 605 F.2d 380, 384-85 (8th Cir. 1979) (antitrust case).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard R. Sibla
Compare United States v. IBM Corp., 618 F.2d 923 at 932-933 (2d Cir. 1980) (suggesting an implicit timeliness requirement in section 455) with SCA Services, Inc. v. Morgan, 557 F.2d 110, 117 (7th Cir. 1977) (no timeliness requirement) and United States v. Schreiber, 599 F.2d 534 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 843 , 100 S.Ct. 86 , 62 L.Ed.2d 56 (1979) (using plain error standard).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gloria Aulet
See, e. g., United *186 States v. Schreiber, 599 F.2d 534, 538 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 843 , 100 S.Ct. 86 , 62 L.Ed.2d 56 (U.S. Oct. 2, 1979); United States v. Rodriquez, 582 F.2d 1015, 1016 (5th Cir. 1978) (per curiam); United States v. Kazni, 576 F.2d 238, 242 (9th Cir. 1978).
Stuart, Co-Trustee
v.
Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Company of Chicago, Co-Trustee
v.
Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Company of Chicago, Co-Trustee
No. 78-1928.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1979.
Published
Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.