green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 5×
10.1 score
G Cite
cited 6× by 1 distinct case ·
“This court has held on numerous occasions that federal district courts do not have jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 or any other theory to reverse or modify the judgments of state courts.”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“in exercising its investigatory powers . . . HEW must have substantial latitude in scrutinizing policies and practices of the institution that may have a discriminatory impact on the intended beneficiaries of assistance”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 39 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Jesse Ramirez v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., and Mark White, Attorney General of Texas
(2×)
But cf. Freeman v. Georgia, 599 F.2d 65, 71 (5th Cir. 1979) (dictum), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S.Ct. 661 , 62 L.Ed.2d 641 (1980).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Sellards
this court has held on numerous occasions that federal district courts do not have jurisdiction under 42 u.s.c. 1983 or any other theory to reverse or modify the judgments of state courts.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Paralyzed Veterans Of America v. Civil Aeronautics Board
to this end, courts favor broad and inclusive application of statutory language by which coverage of legislation to protect and implement civil rights is defined.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Pina v. Henderson
we feel that when an investigatory police officer willfully and intentionally conceals material information, regardless of his motivation and the otherwise proper conduct of the state attorney, the policeman's conduct must be imputed to the state as a part of the prosecution team…
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Grove City College v. Bell
in exercising its investigatory powers . . . hew must have substantial latitude in scrutinizing policies and practices of the institution that may have a discriminatory impact on the intended beneficiaries of assistance
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Grove City College, Individually and on Behalf of Its Students Marianne Sickafuse Kenneth J. Hockenberry Jennifer S. Smith and Victor E. Vouga v. T. H. Bell, Secretary of U. S. Department of Education Harry M. Singleton, Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, U. S. Department of Education, Grove City College, Individually and on Behalf of Its Students Marianne Sickafuse Kenneth J. Hockenberry Jennifer S. Smith and Victor E. Vouga v. T. H. Bell, Secretary of U. S. Department of Education Harry M. Singleton, Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, U. S. Department of Education
in exercising its investigatory powers ... hew must have substantial latitude in scrutinizing policies and practices of the institution that may have a discriminatory impact on the intended beneficiaries of assistance
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel Basile, United States of America v. Richard Decaro
(2×)
See Delay v. United States, 602 F.2d 173, 179 (8th Cir.1979) (Heaney, J., concurring) (suggesting that Petite policy “should be enforceable by a defendant in an appropriate case”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1012 , 100 S.Ct. 660 , 62 L.Ed.2d 641 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Raffa
See First State Bank of Hudson County v. United States, 599 F.2d 558, 562 (3d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S.Ct. 662 , 62 L.Ed.2d 642 (1980) (duty to protect the corporate entity and its shareholders rested solely on bank’s board of directors); Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Butcher, 660 F.Supp. 1274, 1282 (E.D.Tenn.1987) (failure of FDIC to discover or disclose fraud does not establish a claim for relief).
cited
Cited "see"
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Smith
See First State Bank of Hudson County v. United States, 599 F.2d 558, 563-64 (3rd Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S.Ct. 662 , 62 L.Ed.2d 642 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Isham
See, First State Bank of Hudson County v. United States, 599 F.2d 558, 563 (3rd Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S.Ct. 662 , 62 L.Ed.2d 642 (1980), (bank officers and directors cannot shift their responsibility to exercise due care onto the FDIC merely by purchasing insurance from it).
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. State of New York and City of New York
See First State Bank v. United States, 599 F.2d 558, 562-63 (3d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S.Ct. 662 , 62 L.Ed.2d 642 (1980); Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Godshall, 558 F.2d *61 220, 221 n. 3 (4th Cir.1977).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Steve
See State v. Turcio, 178 Conn. 116, 140 , 422 A.2d 749 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S. Ct. 661 , 62 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
John K. Johnsen Frances Johnsen, Cross-Appellants v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Cross-Appellee
See First State Bank v. United States, 599 F.2d 558 , 563 n. 3 (3d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S.Ct. 662 , 62 L.Ed.2d 642 (1980); Walt Disney Productions v. United States, 480 F.2d 66, 68 (9th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 934 , 94 S.Ct. 1451 , 39 L.Ed.2d 493 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Brelsford
See State v. Turcio, 178 Conn. 116, 132 , 422 A.2d 749 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S. Ct. 661 , 62 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Miller v. United States
See Terkel v. Kelly, 599 F.2d 214 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S.Ct. 662 , 62 L.Ed.2d 642 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Northern Trust Co. v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.
This Court has held that the Receiver’s Manual does not establish enforceable rights in favor of third parties {Chase Manhattan v. FDIC; Seattle-First v. FDIC; accord, 1st State Bk. of Hudson Co. v. U.S., 599 F.2d 558, 564 (3rd Cir. 1979), cert. den. 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S.Ct. 662 , 62 L.Ed.2d 642 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Henderson v. Buchanan (In Re Western World Funding, Inc.)
See First State Bank of Hudson County v. United States, 599 F.2d 558, 562 (3rd Cir.1979), cert. denied 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S.Ct. 662 , 62 L.Ed.2d 642 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Garry Deyoung v. Leon Baldwin and Modern Business Equipment Company
See Lampkin-Asam v. Supreme Court of Florida, 601 F.2d 760 (5th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S.Ct. 662 , 62 L.Ed.2d 642 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Shine
See State v. Turcio, 178 Conn. 116, 132 , 422 A.2d 749 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S. Ct. 661 , 62 L.
examined
Cited "see"
Robert Lee Holleman v. United States
(4×)
See Freeman v. State, 599 F.2d 65, 69-70 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S.Ct. 661 , 62 L.Ed.2d 641 (1980); United States v. Butler, 567 F.2d 885, 891 (9th Cir.1978) (per curiam); United States v. Esposito, 523 F.2d 242, 248 (7th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 916 , 96 S.Ct. 1517 , 47 L.Ed.2d 768 (1976); Barbee v. Warden, 331 F.2d 842, 846 (4th Cir.1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Tito Castro Construction, Inc.
See First State Bank v. United States, 599 F.2d 558 (3d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S.Ct. 662 , 62 L.Ed.2d 642 (1980); Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 60 , - L.Ed.2d - (1982) (FDIC has complete defense to state and common law fraud claims on note acquired by it).
discussed
Cited "see"
Miller v. Bell
(2×)
See Terkel v. Kelly, 599 F.2d 214, 216 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S.Ct. 662 , 62 L.Ed.2d 642 (1980). 18 A. Exemption (b)(7)(D). 19 We first turn our attention to (b)(7)(D), which exempts investigatory records compiled for law enforcement purposes to the extent that their release would "disclose the identity of a confidential source and, in the case of a record compiled by a criminal law enforcement authority in the course of a criminal investigation, ... confidential information furnished only by the confidential source." The district court noted that this exemption is …
discussed
Cited "see"
Miller v. Bell
(2×)
See Terkel v. Kelly, 599 F.2d 214, 216 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S.Ct. 662 , 62 L.Ed.2d 642 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Donald E. Muir, H. Jeff Buttram, and O. Navarro Faircloth, Plaintiffs v. Alabama Educational Television Commission Jacob Walker, Etc.
(2×)
See American Security Council Education Foundation v. FCC, 197 U.S.App.D.C. 124 , 607 F.2d 438 (1979) (en banc), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S.Ct. 662 , 62 L.Ed.2d 642 (1980).
examined
Cited "see"
Pressie Hughes, Jr. v. Joe S. Hopper
(4×)
See Freeman v. State of Georgia, 599 F.2d 65, 72 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S.Ct. 661 , 62 L.Ed.2d 641 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gaston Gerald
(2×)
See United States v. Capo, 595 F.2d 1086 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1012 , 100 S.Ct. 660 , 62 L.Ed.2d 641 (trial began one year after the offenses occurred).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Blackmon v. Scott
(2×)
See, e.g., Freeman v. Georgia, 599 F.2d 65 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S.Ct. 661 , 62 L.Ed.2d 641 (1980); Lockett v. Blackburn, 571 F.2d 309 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 873 , 99 S.Ct. 207 , 58 L.Ed.2d 186 (1978). 24 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Acton
See, e.g., First State Bank of Hudson County v. United States, 599 F.2d 558 (3rd Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S.Ct. 662 , 62 L.Ed.2d 642 (1980) (FDIC owed no duty to warn bank directors of wrongdoing committed by the bank’s president); Harmsen v. Smith, 586 F.2d 156, 158 (9th Cir.1978) (Comptroller of the Currency owed no duty to shareholders and directors of banks); F.D.I.C. v. Isham, 782 F.Supp. 524, 531 (D.Colo.1992) (“former officers and directors cannot interpose FDIC’s conduct for their own benefit as an affirmative defense to their misconduct.”).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Caughron
(4×)
See, e.g., Freeman v. State of Georgia, 599 F.2d 65, 69 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S.Ct. 661 , 62 L.Ed.2d 641 (1980); Lockett v. Blackburn, 571 F.2d 309, 313 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 873 , 99 S.Ct. 207 , 58 L.Ed.2d 186 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hayden Leigh Silets v. United States Department of Justice
See also Terkel v. Kelly, 599 F.2d 214, 217 (7th Cir.1979) (“[I]n determining whether the district court erred in refusing to conduct an in camera review, the key issue is whether the agency has provided a sufficient description of the contested information to establish that it logically falls within the category of the claimed exemption ... particularly [where] there is nothing in the record to raise the issue of good faith.”), cert. den., 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S.Ct. 662 , 62 L.Ed.2d 642 (1980); cf. Wright v. Occupational Safety & Health Admin., 822 F.2d 642 , 646-48 (7th Cir.1987) (Distric…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Ashley
See, e.g., First State Bank of Hudson Co. v. United States, 599 F.2d 558, 563 (3rd Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S.Ct. 662 , 62 L.Ed.2d 642 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United Wire, Metal & MacHine Health & Welfare Fund v. Board of Savings & Loan Ass'n Commissioners
See, e.g., First State Bank v. United States, 599 F.2d 558 (3d Cir.1979) (the FDIC had no duty to warn bank officers and directors about wrongdoing committed by bank officer and discovered by FDIC), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S.Ct 662 , 62 L.Ed.2d 642 (1980); Federal Deposit Ins.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Scott v. Department of Commerce
See, e.g., First State Bank of Hudson County v. U.S., 599 F.2d 558 (3d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1013 (1980); Harmsen v. Smith, 586 F.2d 156 (9th Cir. 1978); In re Franklin Nat.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Corpus Christi Taxpayer's Association, Cross-Appellees v. City of Corpus Christi, Texas, Cross-Appellant, State of Texas
See, e.g., Lampkin-Asam v. Supreme Court of Florida, 601 F.2d 760 (5th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S.Ct. 662 , 62 L.Ed.2d 642 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Struth v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
Compare Terkel v. Kelly, 599 F.2d 214, 216 (7th Cir.1979) (Exemption 7(D) applied to commercial institutions), cert, denied, 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S.Ct. 662 , 62 L.Ed.2d 642 (1980) with Ferguson v. Kelly, 455 F.Supp. 324, 325 (N.D.I11.1978) (credit bureau cannot be "confidential source"). 13 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Herman Lee Staples
(2×)
Id. at 29 , 98 S.Ct. at 85 ; see also Delay v. United States, 602 F.2d 173, 177 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1012 , 100 S.Ct. 660 , 62 L.Ed.2d 641 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Zinman v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.
See also, First State Bank of Hudson County v. United States, 599 F.2d 558 (3d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S.Ct. 662 , 62 L.Ed.2d 642 (1980); Freeling v. FDIC, 221 F.Supp. 955 (W.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stein v. Department Of Justice
See also Terkel v. Kelly, 599 F.2d 214, 215, 217 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S.Ct. 662 , 62 L.Ed.2d 642 (1980). 45 In its provisions for judicial review, the Act's scheme is awkward at best.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Stein v. Department of Justice & Federal Bureau of Investigation
See also Terkel v. Kelly, 599 F.2d 214, 215, 217 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1013 , 100 S.Ct. 662 , 62 L.Ed.2d 642 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rose
v.
Bradley, Mayor of Los Angeles
v.
Bradley, Mayor of Los Angeles
No. 79-396.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 7, 1980.
444 U.S. 1013
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.