green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.7 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Only prospective relief is afforded by this section [144]. It can not be used as a means of obtaining a new trial.”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Gray v. FURIA ORGANIZATION, INC.
Dec. 11, 1986); Nemo v. Allen, 466 F.Supp. 192, 195-96 (S.D.N.Y.1979); DeWitt v. American Stock Transfer Co., 433 F.Supp. 994, 1005 (S.D.N.Y.1977); Smith v. Murchison, 310 F.Supp. 1079, 1088 (S.D.N.Y.1970) (private right of action under 13(a) "very doubtful"); but see Abbey v. Control Data Corp., 603 F.2d 724, 731 (8th Cir.1979) (assuming existence of private right of action under 13(a), complaint fails to state a claim), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1017 , 100 S.Ct. 670 , 62 L.Ed.2d 647 (1980); Kaminsky v. Abrams, 281 F.Supp. 501, 505 (S.D.N.Y.1968) (same); duPont v. Wyly, 61 F.R.D. 615, 633 (D.Del…
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Duke v. Pfizer, Inc., Div. of Pfizer Hosp.
only prospective relief is afforded by this section . it can not be used as a means of obtaining a new trial.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mississippi Power & Light Co. & Mississippi Public Service Commission v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.
the remedy should not be granted unless the movant carries the burden of persuasion concerning all four of these criteria.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Ellicott MacHine Corporation, Incorporated v. John Holland Party Limited
Id., at 292 , 100 S.Ct. at 564 (citations omitted).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Freedom Savings and Loan Association, Counterclaim/defendant v. Vernon Way, Jr., D/B/A Freedom Realty, Counterclaim/plaintiff
Vision Center v. Opticks, Inc., 596 F.2d 111 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 *1183 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles LaLiberte v. Charles Samuels, Jr.
See World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286, 291-92 , 100 S.Ct. 669 , 62 L.Ed.2d 490 (1980) (nonresident defendant must have minimum contacts such that suit “does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice”); Miller v. Nippon Carbon Co., 528 F.3d 1087, 1090-91 (8th Cir. 2008) (de novo review).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hoop Culture, Inc. v. Gap, Inc.
See Vision Ctr. v. Opticks, Inc., 596 F.2d 111, 115-16 (5th Cir.1979) (describing the definitions of and the degree of protection for generic, descriptive, suggestive, and arbitrary or fanciful terms), 2 cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
InterState Net Bank v. NetB@ Nk, Inc.
See Vision Center v. Opticks, Inc., 596 F.2d 111, 118 (5th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980)(emphasis on word “Pearle” in “Pearle Vision Center,” where vision center was merely descriptive, negated any charge of deception or unfair competition).
cited
Cited "see"
Citizens National Bank of Meridian v. Citizens Bank of Philadelphia
See Vision Ctr. v. Opticks, Inc., 596 F.2d 111 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980); Miss Universe, Inc. v. Patricelli, 408 F.2d 506 (2d Cir.1969).
examined
Cited "see"
Dunlap v. United Transportation Union
(3×)
See Ekas v. Carling Nat’l Breweries, Inc., 602 F.2d 664 (4th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1017 , 100 S.Ct. 669 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980); Long v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry., 42 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas.
discussed
Cited "see"
Capital Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.
See Marty’s Floor Covering Co. v. GAF Corp., 604 F.2d 266, 270 (4th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1017 , 100 S.Ct. 670 , 62 L.Ed.2d 647 (1980); Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. v. FTC, 191 F.2d 786 , 792 (7th Cir.1951), cert. dismissed, 344 U.S. 206 , 73 S.Ct. 245 , 97 L.Ed. 245 (1952).
discussed
Cited "see"
Black v. NuAire, Inc.
See Abbey v. Control Data Corp., 603 F.2d 724 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1017 , 100 S.Ct. 670 , 62 L.Ed.2d 647 (1980) (construing Delaware law); Lewis, 615 F.2d at 780 (construing California law); Auerbach v. Bennett, 47 N.Y.2d 619 , 419 N.Y.S.2d 920 , 393 N.E.2d 994 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Moore Business Forms, Inc. v. Seidenburg
See Vision Ctr. v. Opticks, Inc., 596 F.2d 111 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980); Miss Universe, Inc. v. Patricelli, 408 F.2d 506 (2d Cir.1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lewis E. FOSTER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant
See Konczak v. Tyrrell, 603 F.2d 13, 17 (7th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980); Baskin v. Parker, 602 F.2d 1205, 1210 (5th Cir.1979) (rejecting the same erroneous construction of Carey).
discussed
Cited "see"
Precision Tune, Inc. v. Tune-A-Car, Inc.
See, Vision Center v. Opticks, Inc., 596 F.2d 111 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980); Miss Universe, Inc. v. Patricelli, 408 F.2d 506 (2d Cir.1969), but see, Hesmer Foods, Inc. v. Campbell Soup Company, 346 F.2d 356 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 839 , 86 S.Ct. 89 , 15 L.Ed.2d 81 (1965) (barbecue beans used as description, not as trademark).
cited
Cited "see"
Brooks Shoe Manufacturing Co., Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, Plaintiff v. Suave Shoe Corporation, a Florida Corporation
See Vision Center v. Opticks, Inc., 596 F.2d 111, 118 (5th Cir. 1979) cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980). 8 .
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,484 John F. Maher v. Zapata Corporation v. William Maldonado, Objector-Appellant
See Abbey v. Control Data Corp., 603 F.2d 724, 730-31 (8th Cir.1979) cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1017 , 100 S.Ct. 670 , 62 L.Ed.2d 647 (1980) (section 13(a)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Larry Corriz v. Emilio Naranjo, Steve Martinez, Canuto Martinez, and Rio Arriba County Sheriff's Department
(2×)
See Konczak v. Tyrrell, 603 F.2d 13, 17 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980); Baskin v. Parker, 602 F.2d 1205, 1210 (5th Cir. 1979) (rejecting the same erroneous construction of Carey).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stein v. Bailey
This doctrine has often been considered one aspect of the “business judgment” rule, which *691 “bars judicial inquiry into actions of directors taken in good faith and in honest pursuit of the legitimate purposes of the corporation.” Galef v. Alexander, 615 F.2d 51, 57 (2d Cir. 1980); see Abbey v. Control Data Corp., 603 F.2d 724, 729-30 (8th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1017 , 100 S.Ct. 670 , 62 L.Ed.2d 647 (1980); Abramowitz v. Posner, 513 F.Supp. 120, 125-26 (S.D.N.Y.1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Watts v. Des Moines Register and Tribune
See Abbey v. Control Data Corp., 460 F.Supp. 1242, 1245 (D.Minn.1978), aff’d, 603 F.2d 724 (8th Cir. 1979), cert. den., 444 U.S. 1017 , 100 S.Ct. 670 , 62 L.Ed.2d 647 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sun Banks of Florida, Inc., a Florida Corporation Etc. v. Sun Federal Savings and Loan Association, a Federal Savings and Loan Association
(2×)
See Vision Ctr. v. Opticks, Inc., 596 F.2d 111 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980); Miss Universe, Inc. v. Patricelli 408 F.2d 506 (2d Cir. 1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Herrera v. Valentine
See Konczak v. Tyrrell, 603 F.2d 13, 17 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980); Burt v. Abel, 585 F.2d 613, 615-616 (4th Cir. 1978); Mickens v. Winston, 462 F.Supp. 910, 913 (E.D.Va.1978), aff’d, 609 F.2d 508 (4th Cir. 1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Herrera v. Valentine
See Konczak v. Tyrrell, 603 F.2d 13, 17 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980); Burt v. Abel, 585 F.2d 613, 615-616 (4th Cir. 1978); Mickens v. Winston, 462 F.Supp. 910, 913 (E.D.Va.1978), aff'd, 609 F.2d 508 (4th Cir. 1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,000 Ora E. Gaines v. D. J. Haughton, Lois A. And James Fitzpatrick v. D. J. Haughton
See Abbey v. Control Data Corp., 603 F.2d 724, 727-30 (8th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1017 , 100 S.Ct. 670 , 62 L.Ed.2d 647 (1980) (applying Delaware law); Auerbach v. Bennett, 47 N.Y.2d 619, 629-36 , 419 N.Y.S.2d 920, 926-30 , 393 N.E.2d 994 (1979) (applying New York law).
cited
Cited "see"
Robert Leslie Busche, Cross-Appellant v. Wallace E. Burkee, Cross-Appellee
See Konczak v. Tyrrell, 603 F.2d 13, 18 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980).
examined
Cited "see"
Paul J. Baker v. Newspaper and Graphic Communications Union, Local 6
(3×)
The incidents of seniority can be freely altered or amended by modification of the collective agreement.” Local 1251, UAW v. Robertshaw Controls Co., 405 F.2d 29, 33 (2d Cir. 1968) (en banc); accord, Ekas v. Carling Nat’l Breweries, Inc., 602 F.2d 664 (4th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1017 , 100 S.Ct. 669 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ice Cold Auto Air of Clearwater, Inc. v. Cold Air & Accessories, Inc.
See also, Discount Muffler Shop, Inc. v. Meineke Realty Corp., 535 F.Supp. 439, 444 (N.D.Ohio, 1982) (citing Vision Center v. Opticks, Inc., 596 F.2d 111 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980)).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jay Lindsay, D/B/A Mac Advertising Company v. The City of San Antonio
Id.; see also Vision Center v. Opticks, Inc., 596 F.2d 111, 114 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Liquid Controls Corporation v. Liquid Control Corporation
McCarthy, Trademarks & Unfair Competition § 11:16 (2d ed. 1984); see, e.g., Vision Center v. Opticks, Inc., 596 F.2d 111, 119 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980); Educational Development Corp. v. Economy Co., 562 F.2d 26, 28 (10th Cir. 1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Guntharp
v.
Planters Oil Mill
v.
Planters Oil Mill
No. 79-694.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 7, 1980.
444 U.S. 1017
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1) · E.D. Michigan (1)
Sup. Ct. Miss. Certiorari denied.