green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.7 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“articles of personal property tending to establish the identity of persons and control of premises”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Kenneth Joe Whitten, John Elmer Gaiefsky, Jack Wayne Gish, Richard Lawrence Shimel
articles of personal property tending to establish the identity of persons and control of premises
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Houlihan
See ___ United States v. Lieberman, 608 F.2d 889, 897 (1st Cir. 1979) _____________ _________ (rejecting a claim that the government has "a duty to create Jencks Act material by recording everything a potential witness says"), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1019 (1980); accord United States _____ ______ ______ _____________ v. Bernard, 625 F.2d 854, 859 (9th Cir. 1980); United States v. _______ ______________ Head, 586 F.2d 508, 511-12 (5th Cir. 1978); United States v. ____ ______________ Fielbogen, 494 F. Supp. 806, 814 (S.D.N.Y. 1980), aff'd, 657 F.2d _________ _____ 265 (2d Cir. 1981) (table).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Houlihan
(2×)
See United States v. Lieberman, 608 F.2d 889, 897 (1st Cir.1979) (rejecting a claim that the government has “a duty to create Jencks Act material by recording everything a potential witness says”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1019 , 100 S.Ct. 673 , 62 L.Ed.2d 649 (1980); accord United States v. Bernard, 625 F.2d 854, 859 (9th Cir.1980); United States v. Head, 586 *1289 F.2d 508, 511-12 (5th Cir.1978); United States v. Feilbogen, 494 F.Supp. 806, 814 (S.D.N.Y.1980), aff'd, 657 F.2d 265 (2d Cir.1981) (table).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Santiago, A/K/A \Chuco\""
See United States v. Marques, 600 F.2d 742, 749 (9th Cir.1979) (admitting references to Hell’s Angels in drug case when the gang was one of defendant’s customers), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1019 , 100 S.Ct. 674 , 62 L.Ed.2d 649 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Weeks
See State v. Ramos, 131 N.H. 276, 282 , 553 A.2d 275, 279 (1988) (citing United States v. Lieberman, 608 F.2d 889, 902 (1st Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1019 (1980)); see also State v. Adams, 133 N.H. 818, 824 , 585 A.2d 853, 856 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edgar Ryan Witherspoon
See United States v. Marques, 600 F.2d 742, 747 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1019 (1979) (asserted "external pressure" to reach a verdict caused by the trial judge's decision to keep the jury "late a couple of nights" was not sufficient outside influence under Rule 606(b)). 8 Similarly, Witherspoon's remaining three examples of juror misconduct indicate no cognizable external influence.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert J. Winslow, United States of America v. Stephen E. Nelson, United States of America v. Procter J. Baker
See United States v. Marques, 600 F.2d 742, 749 (9th Cir.1979) (not misconduct for prosecutor to mention connection between defendant and Hell’s Angels because evidence showed defendant stated he sold drugs to them), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1019 , 100 S.Ct. 674 , 62 L.Ed.2d 649 (1980); United States v. Cutler, 806 F.2d 933, 936 (9th Cir.1986); cf. Dawson v. Delaware, — U.S. —, —, 112 S.Ct. 1093, 1099 , 117 L.Ed.2d 309 (1992) (the first amendment prevents employing evidence of a defendant’s abstract beliefs at a sentencing hearing when those beliefs have no bearing on the issue being t…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenny Dickens and Melvin Lester
See United States v. Marques, 600 F.2d 742, 749 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1019 , 100 S.Ct. 674 , 62 L.Ed.2d 649 (1980); United States v. Love, 534 F.2d 87, 88-89 (6th Cir.1976).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Guy Mickey McNulty George O'brien, Theodore Tulper, Donald Staadts, James Nestoff and Dennis Valley
(4×)
See United States v. Vazquez, 605 F.2d 1269, 1274-80 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 484 , 62 L.Ed.2d 408 (1979), 444 U.S. 1019 , 100 S.Ct. 674 , 62 L.Ed.2d 649 (1980); United States v. Sotomayor, 592 F.2d 1219, 1222-27 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 919 , 99 S.Ct. 2842 , 61 L.Ed.2d 286 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lavonne Alberts
See United States v. Matthews, 603 F.2d 48, 51 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1019 , 100 S.Ct. 674 , 62 L.Ed.2d 650 (1980).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul Defiore, Joseph Coppola and Robert Galler
(4×)
See United States v. Lieberman, 608 F.2d 889, 900 (1st Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1019 , 100 S.Ct. 673 , 62 L.Ed.2d 649 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Bagnariol, United States of America v. Gordon L. Walgren, United States of America v. Patrick Gallagher
See United States v. Marques, 600 F.2d 742, 747 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1019 , 100 S.Ct. 674 , 62 L.Ed.2d 649 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Feilbogen
See United States v. Lieberman, 608 F.2d 889, 897 (1st Cir. 1979), cert. denied, __ U.S. __, 100 S.Ct. 673 , 62 L.Ed.2d 649 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mary Dangerfield Bengivenga
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Marks, 603 F.2d 582, 584 (5th Cir.1979) (per curiam) (even if focus and probable cause existed, statements made to undercover agents "were uttered in a context completely free from coercion”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1018 , 100 S.Ct. 673 , 62 L.Ed.2d 649 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. George Mostella
See also United States v. Mar *362 ques, 600 F.2d 742, 748 (9th Cir.1979) (new trial appropriate when judge’s participation creates the appearance of giving aid to one party or another), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1019 , 100 S.Ct. 674 , 62 L.Ed.2d 649 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Grand Jury Matters, Appeal of United States of America
(2×)
See also United States v. Lieberman, 608 F.2d 889, 904 (1st Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1019 , 100 S.Ct. 673 , 62 L.Ed.2d 649 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Quirk v. United States
See also Neumann v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 591 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1019 (1980) (delay of 5 years, 11 months, 28 days); D’Ascenzo v. United States, 215 Ct. Cl. 971 (1977) (delay of 5 years, 11 months, 20 days).
Lieberman
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 79-852.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 7, 1980.
444 U.S. 1019
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2)
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.