green
Positive treatment
8.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 29 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gennaro J. Angiulo, Donato F. Angiulo, Samuel S. Granito, Francesco J. Angiulo and Michele A. Angiulo
(2×)
See United States v. Birdman, 602 F.2d 547, 556-60 (3d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1032 , 100 S.Ct. 703 , 62 L.Ed.2d 668 (1980). 9 That situation, however, does not confront us here.
discussed
Cited "see"
Presnell v. Allstate Insurance Co.
(2×)
See Hime v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 284 N.W.2d 829, 833 (Minn.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1032 , 100 S.Ct. 703 , 62 L.Ed.2d 668 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Zolp
(2×)
See United States v. Continental Group, Inc., 603 F.2d 444, 456-57 (3d Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1032 , 100 S.Ct. 703 , 62 L.Ed.2d 668 (1980); United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575, 582 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979).
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Young
(4×)
See United States v. Birdman, 602 F.2d 547 (3rd Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1032 , 100 S.Ct. 703 , 62 L.Ed.2d 668 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. De Peri, Joseph. Appeal of Joseph De Peri. United States of America v. Martin, James. Appeal of James Martin. United States of America v. Linso, Dennis. Appeal of Dennis Linso. United States of America v. Morrell, George. Appeal of George Morrell. United States of America v. Pecic, Henry. Appeal of Henry Pecic. United States of America v. Murphy, Theodore. Appeal of Theodore Murphy. United States of America v. Katz, George. Appeal of George Katz
(2×)
See United States v. Continental Group, Inc., 603 F.2d 444, 456-57 (3d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1032 , 100 S.Ct. 703 , 62 L.Ed.2d 668 (1980). 79 In the instant case, the court exercised its discretion and admitted the recorded conversations subject to a later Trowery conspiracy finding.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. De Peri
(2×)
See United States v. Continental Group, Inc., 603 F.2d 444, 456-57 (3d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1032 , 100 S.Ct. 703 , 62 L.Ed.2d 668 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank G. Prantil
(2×)
See United States v. Birdman, 602 F.2d 547, 553-55 (3d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1032 , 100 S.Ct. 703 , 62 L.Ed.2d 668 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank G. Prantil
(2×)
See United States v. Birdman, 602 F.2d 547, 553-55 (3d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1032 , 100 S.Ct. 703 , 62 L.Ed.2d 668 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John W. Downing
(2×)
See United States v. Baller, 519 F.2d at 466 . 62 With respect to the procedure that district courts should follow in making preliminary determinations regarding admissibility of evidence, we recognize that " 'the control of the order of proof at trial is a matter committed to the discretion of the trial judge.' " United States v. Ammar, 714 F.2d 238, 246 (3d Cir.1983) (quoting United States v. Continental Group, Inc., 603 F.2d 444, 456 (3d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1032 , 100 S.Ct. 703 , 62 L.Ed.2d 668 (1980)), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc.
(2×)
See United States v. Continental Group, Inc., 603 F.2d 444, 467 (3d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1032 , 100 S.Ct. 703 , 62 L.Ed.2d 668 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pike Industries, Inc.
(2×)
Accord, United States v. Continental Group, Inc., 603 F.2d 444, 461 (3rd Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1032 , 100 S.Ct. 703 , 62 L.Ed.2d 668 (1980). *890 The indictments against Pike Industries, Milo Pike, and Bruce Homer provide more than a “plain, concise and definite statement” of the charges of bid-rigging.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Capps
(2×)
See U.S. v. Birdman , 602 F. (2d) 547 (3rd 1979), cert. den. 444 U.S. 1032 , 100 S.Ct. 703 , 62 L.Ed. (2d) 668.
examined
Cited "see"
Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.
(4×)
See United States v. Bey, 437 F.2d 188 (3rd Cir. 1971) and its progeny, cited in United States v. Continental Group, Inc., 603 F.2d 444 (3rd Cir. 1979), cert, denied, 444 U.S. 1032 , 100 S.Ct. 703 , 62 L.Ed.2d 668 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cryan
(2×)
See United States v. Continental Group, Inc., 603 F.2d 444, 456 (3rd Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1032 , 100 S.Ct. 703 , 62 L.Ed.2d 668 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Oxford Royal Mushroom Products, Inc.
(2×)
See United States v. Birdman, 602 F.2d 547, 559-61 (3d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 100 S.Ct. 703 , 62 L.Ed.2d 668 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Alfano
(2×)
See also United States v. Birdman, 602 F.2d 547, 555-56 (3d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1032 , 100 S.Ct. 703 , 62 L.Ed.2d 668 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Colton
(2×)
See Rudolph v. State, 829 P.2d 269, 273 (Wyo. 1992); see also United States v. Birdman, 602 F.2d 547, 553 (3d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1032 , 100 S. Ct. 703 , 62 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ullmann v. State
(2×)
The plaintiff, in essence, urges the adoption of a balancing test that weighs the potential injury to the attorney-client relationship against the need for an attorney’s testimony prior to requiring the attorney, particularly a public defender, to testify in a case involving his or her client. 12 At the outset, we note that courts have been reluctant to allow attorneys to be called as witnesses in trials in which they are advocates. 13 See Rudolph v. State, 829 P.2d 269, 273 (Wyo. 1992); see also United States v. Birdman, 602 F.2d 547, 553 (3d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1032 , 100 S.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Pasciuti
(2×)
See e.g., United Sttes [States] v. Birdman, 602 F.2d 547, 558 (3d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1032 [ 100 S.Ct. 703 , 62 L.Ed.2d 668 ] (1980); United States v. Gonsalves, 691 F.2d 1310, 1315-16 (9th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Fisher
(2×)
“An indictment returned by a legally constituted and unbiased grand jury, ... if valid on its face, is enough to call for trial of the charge on the merits.” Costello v. United, States, 350 U.S. 359, 363 , 76 S.Ct. 406, 409 , 100 L.Ed. 397 (1956); see also United States v. Adamo, 742 F.2d 927, 935-36 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1193 , 105 S.Ct. 971 , 83 L.Ed.2d 975 (1985) “[T]he federal courts have clearly established the principle ‘that the dismissal of an indictment on the basis of governmental misconduct is an extreme sanction which should be infrequently utilized.’ ”…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Messerlian, Harry H., in 85-5323. United States of America v. Wolkowski, Henry F., in 86-5345
(2×)
Th[is] rule ... has stood without exception in this Court for 53 years.”); Harris v. Rivera, 454 U.S. 339 , 102 S.Ct. 460 , 70 L.Ed.2d 530 (1981); Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87 , 94 S.Ct. 2887 , 41 L.Ed.2d 590 (1974); Dunn v. United States, 284 U.S. 390 , 52 S.Ct. 189 , 76 L.Ed. 356 (1932); see also United States v. Continental Group, Inc., 603 F.2d 444 (3d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1032 , 100 S.Ct. 703 , 62 L.Ed.2d 668 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rosendin Electric, Inc.
(2×)
See also United States v. Birdman, 602 F.2d 547 (3rd Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1032 , 100 S.Ct. 703 , 62 L.Ed.2d 668 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Haynos
See also Commonwealth v. DeJohn, 486 Pa. 32 , 403 A.2d 1283 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1032 , 100 S.Ct. 704 , 62 L.Ed.2d 668 (1980) (subpoena concededly unlawful where, at time of issuance, there were no ongoing legal proceedings against appellant).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Search Warrant B-21778 Gartley
See also Commonwealth v. DeJohn, 486 Pa. 32 , 403 A.2d 1283 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1032 , 100 S.Ct. 704 , 62 L.Ed.2d 668 (1980) (Subpoena concededly unlawful where, at time of issuance, there were no ongoing legal proceedings against appellant.) Characterizing the impanelment of an investigating grand jury with its subpoena powers as a less intrusive means by which to proceed, the trial judge quashed the search warrant.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gregg
(2×)
See also United States v. Continental Group, Inc., 603 F.2d 444, 456 (3d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1032 , 100 S.Ct. 703 , 62 L.Ed.2d 668 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ted Johnston
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Birdman, 602 F.2d 547, 551-55 (3d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1032 , 100 S.Ct. 703 , 62 L.Ed.2d 668 (1980), 445 U.S. 906 , 100 S.Ct. 1084 , 63 L.Ed.2d 322 (1980); Phillips v. Wyrick, 558 F.2d 489 , 497 n.3 (8th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1088 , 98 S.Ct. 1283 , 55 L.Ed.2d 793 (1978); United States v. Schwartzbaum, 527 F.2d 249, 253 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 942 , 96 S.Ct. 1410 , 47 L.Ed.2d 348 (1976); Gajewski v. U.S., 321 F.2d 261, 268 (8th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 968 , 84 S.Ct. 486 , 11 L.Ed.2d 416 (1964); United States v. Cl…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Phyllis M. Nelson, Etc., and Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, and Cross-Appellee v. Duncanson-Harrelson Co., Third Party
See also Vagle v. Pickands Mather & Co., 611 F.2d 1212 (8th Cir. 1979) (Minnesota law, vicarious negligence), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1033 , 100 S.Ct. 704 , 62 L.Ed.2d 668 (1980). 7 .
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John B. Nicosia
(4×)
See also United States v. Continental Group, Inc., 603 F.2d 444, 457 (3d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1032 , 100 S.Ct. 703 , 62 L.Ed.2d 668 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Long
(2×)
See also Commonwealth v. DeJohn, 486 Pa. 32 , 403 A.2d 1283 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1032 , 100 S.Ct. 704 , 62 L.Ed.2d 668 (1980) (great expectation of privacy of account holder in bank account records).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
v.
Hime
v.
Hime
No. 79-767.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 14, 1980.
444 U.S. 1032
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Sup. Ct. Minn. Certiorari denied.