green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.9 score
“that venue may also be appropriate in another district will not divest venue properly established under 3238.”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Pendleton
that venue may also be appropriate in another district will not divest venue properly established under 3238.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gerald Francis McKnight
See United States v. Erwin, 602 F.2d 1183, 1185 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1071 , 100 S.Ct. 1014 , 62 L.Ed.2d 752 (1980); United States v. Rojas, 537 F.2d 216 , 219-220 & n. 2 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1061 , 97 S.Ct. 785 , 50 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Elon Kevan Rowlee, Ii, and the New York Patriots Society for Individual Liberty Association
Black’s Law Dictionary 1300 (5th ed.1979); see United States v. Moss, 604 F.2d 569, 571 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1071 , 100 S.Ct. 1014 , 62 L.Ed.2d 752 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Child Protection Group v. Cline
See Providence Journal Co. v. F.B.I., 460 F.Supp. 778, 787 (D.R.I.1978), rev'd on other grounds, 602 F.2d 1010 (1st Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1071 , 100 S.Ct. 1015 , 62 L.Ed.2d 752 (1980). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pena
See United States v. Merlino, 595 F.2d 1016 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1071 , 100 S.Ct. 1014 , 62 L.Ed.2d 752 (1980); United States v. Walbert, supra. Because the tapes were transcribed, however, the question becomes whether the Jencks Act requires the Government to produce both the typed reports and the tapes from which the typed reports were transcribed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Marzen v. United States Department of Health & Human Services
See Providence Journal Co. v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, 460 F.Supp. 778 , 789-91 n. 52 (D.R.I.1978), rev’d on other grounds, 602 F.2d 1010 (1st Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1071 , 100 S.Ct. 1015 , 62 L.Ed.2d 752 (1980); Congressional News-Syndicate v. United States Department of Justice, 438 F.Supp. 538 , 542 n. 2, 543 (D.D.C.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald Jonas
See United States v. Erwin, 602 F.2d 1183, 1184 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1071 , 100 S.Ct. 1014 , 62 L.Ed.2d 752 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marcano
Accord, United States v. Merlino, 595 F.2d 1016, 1020 (5th Cir., 1979) cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1071 , 100 S.Ct. 1014 , 62 L.Ed.2d 752 ; United States v. Rodriguez, 588 F.2d 1003, 1009 (5th Cir., 1979); United States v. D’Alora, 585 F.2d 16, 22 (1st Cir., 1978); United States v. Young, 570 F.2d 152, 153 (6th Cir., 1978); United States v. Kennedy, 548 F.2d 608, 609 (5th Cir., 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 865 , 98 S.Ct. 199 , 54 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); United States v. Jones, 480 F.2d 1135, 1139 (2nd Cir., 1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clift v. Narragansett Television L.P.
(2×)
See also Providence Journal Co. v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, 460 F.Supp. 778, 793 (D.R.I.1978), rev'd on other grounds, 602 F.2d 1010 (1st Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1071 , 100 S.Ct. 1015 , 62 L.Ed.2d 752 (1980); Restatement (Second) Torts § 652I, comments a, b (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert O'keefe, John Edwin Montgomery, Jr., United States of America v. John Montgomery, and Robert T. O'Keefe
See e.g., United States v. Merlino, 595 F.2d 1016, 1018 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1071 , 100 S.Ct. 1014 , 62 L.Ed.2d 752 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Moss
See also United States v. Moss, 604 F.2d 569 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1071 , 100 S.Ct. 1014 , 62 L.Ed.2d 752 (1980) (citing Buttorff in holding that defendant has no First Amendment protection for a speech explaining how to violate federal income tax laws).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gary Barnett
See also United States v. Moss, 604 F.2d 569, 571 (8th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1071 , 100 S.Ct. 1014 , 62 L.Ed.2d 752 (1980) (citing Buttorff in holding that defendant has no first amendment protection for a speech explaining how to violate federal income tax laws).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Phillips
See, e. g., United States v. Erwin, 602 F.2d 1183, 1185 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1071 , 100 S.Ct. 1014 , 62 L.Ed.2d 752 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mark Steven Phillips and Richard Elliott Grant, Jr., United States of America v. Robert Jay Meinster, A/K/A \Robby\"
See, e. g., United States v. Erwin, 602 F.2d 1183, 1185 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1071 , 100 S.Ct. 1014 , 62 L.Ed.2d 752 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Dubuque v. Telegraph Herald, Inc.
See, e.g., Providence Journal Co. v. F.B.I., 602 F.2d 1010 ,1014 n.8 (1st Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1071 , 100 S.Ct. 1015 , 62 L.Ed.2d 752 (1980); Petkas v. Staats, 501 F.2d 887, 889 (D.C.Cir.1974); Robles v. Environmental Protection Agency, 484 F.2d 843, 846 (4th Cir. 1973); cf. Charles River Park “A”, Inc. v. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 519 F.2d 935, 940 (D.C.Cir.1975) (‘If [the information] is not found to be confidential under the [Freedom of Information Act], it must be disclosed on request even if it was submitted in confidence.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Driver
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 79-601.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 1980.
Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.