green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 5×
15.9 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1996 ·
…quantified, the preponderance standard would be 50 probable.
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1996 ·
…quantified, the preponderance standard would be 50 probable.
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1989 ·
…the appropriate standard is to remand for correction of error only when there is substantial doubt that the administrative agency would have reached the result it did absent reference to the material.
at p. 69
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers, Union No. 33 v. Edwin Meese, Attorney General of the United States of America
Cf. McMillan v. Pennsylvania, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 2411 , 91 L.Ed.2d 67 (1986) (factual finding requiring imposition of mandatory minimum sentence may be made by trial judge on a preponderance of the evidence); but cf. United States v. Fatico, 458 F.Supp. 388, 408 (E.D.N.Y.1978) (applying “clear, unequivocal and convincing evidence” standard where factual finding “will result in a much longer and harsher sentence”), aff'd, 603 F.2d 1053 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980).
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Ramsay
But see United States v. Fatico, 579 F.2d 707, 712-13 (2d Cir.1978) (significant chance of falsity may place burden on the prosecution to verify information in PSI), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 910 , 99 S.Ct. 1221 , 59 L.Ed.2d 458 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980).
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Charnes v. Robinson
(2×)
also: Cited as authority (quoted)
the appropriate standard is to remand for correction of error only when there is substantial doubt that the administrative agency would have reached the result it did absent reference to the material.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Gigante
quantified, the preponderance standard would be 50 probable.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Gigante
quantified, the preponderance standard would be 50 probable.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Gigante
quantified, the preponderance standard would be 50 probable.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Gigante
quantified, the preponderance standard would be 50 probable.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Ruben Perea
Ortiz eventually pleaded guilty to the marijuana possession count, and Perea testified for the government at a Fatico hearing held with respect to the sentencing of Ortiz (United States v. Fatico, 603 F.2d 1053 , 1057 & n. 9 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 *639 (1980); United States v. Fatico, 579 F.2d 707, 713 (2d Cir.1978)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Shonubi
See United States v. Fatico, 458 F.Supp. 388, 409 (E.D.N.Y.1978) (sliding scale for burdens of proof in sentencing depending upon the seriousness of a finding’s impact), affirmed, 603 F.2d 1053 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Abdul-Malik
See United States v. Fatico, 458 F.Supp. 388, 400 (E.D.N.Y.1978), aff'd, 603 F.2d 1053 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980); United States v. Sebastian, 497 F.2d 1267 (2d Cir.1974); United States v. Percevault, 490 F.2d 126 (2d Cir.1974); United States v. Covello, 410 F.2d 536 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 879 , 90 S.Ct. 150 , 24 L.Ed.2d 136 (1969).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Shonubi
(3×)
See United States v. Fatico, 458 F.Supp. 388, 410 (E.D.N.Y.1978) (chart), aff'd on other grounds, 603 F.2d 1053 (2d Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980); C.M.A.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Tropiano
See United States v. Fatico, 458 F.Supp. 388 (E.D.N.Y.1978), aff'd, 603 F.2d 1053 (2d Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel Michael Tropiano
See United States v. Fatico, 579 F.2d 707 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Luis E. Gaviria
See United States v. Fatico, 579 F.2d 707 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Ray Williams
See United States v. Fatico, 603 F.2d 1053 , 1057 n. 9 (2d Cir.1979) cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (19[79]).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Escobar
See United States v. Fatico, 579 F.2d 707 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Koch v. Shell Oil Co.
Tenny, M.D., P.A., 250 Kan. 621 , 829 P.2d 561, 565 (1992) (citations omitted); see Hiatt Grain & Feed, Inc., v. Bergland, 602 F.2d 929, 934 (10th Cir. 1979) (courts are the final authority on issues of statutory construction), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1019 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Scott Lee Young, United States of America v. Donald Charles Allman, United States of America v. Michael Allen Crow
(2×)
See United States v. Fatico, 579 F.2d 707, 708-709 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980). 44 In Fatico, a pre-sentencing guidelines case incorporated in the comments to § 6A1.3, the Second Circuit stated: "We hold ... that Due Process [and the Confrontation Clause] [do] not prevent use in sentencing of out-of-court declarations by an unidentified informant where there is good cause for the nondisclosure of his identity and there is sufficient corroboration by other means." Fatico, 579 F.2d at 713 (emphasis added).
discussed
Cited "see"
Drywall Tapers And Pointers Of Greater New York, Local 1974 Of I.B.P.A.T., Afl-Cio v. Local 530 Of Operative Plasterers And Cement Masons International Association
See Drywall Tapers & Pointers, Local 1974 v. Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' Int'l Ass'n, 601 F.2d 675 , 677 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980). 2 On March 1, 1978, a Hearings Panel ruled that drywall pointing and taping is painters' work, i.e., Local 1974's work, unless done on surfaces that are to receive plaster, acoustical, or imitation acoustical finishes, in which case it is plasterers' work, i.e., Local 530's work.
discussed
Cited "see"
Drywall Tapers & Pointers of Greater New York, Local 1974 of I.B.P.A.T. v. Local 530 of Operative Plasterers & Cement Masons International Ass'n
See Drywall Tapers & Pointers, Local 1974 v. Operative Plasterers’ & Cement Masons’ Int’l Ass’n, 601 F.2d 675 , 677 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980). 2 On March 1, 1978, a Hearings Panel ruled that drywall pointing and taping is painters’ work, i.e., Local 1974’s work, unless done on surfaces that are to receive plaster, acoustical, or imitation acoustical finishes, in which case it is plasterers’ work, i.e., Local 530’s work.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alvaro Rojo-Alvarez, United States v. Adalberto Franco-Montoya, United States v. Walter Antonio Palacio-Perez, United States v. Carlos Arevalo-Gomez
See U.S. v. Fatico, 603 F.2d 1053, 1056-57 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980) (pre-guidelines case holding that out-of-court statements of unidentified informant admissible for sentencing).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dario Restrepo
(2×)
See United States v. Fatico, 458 F.Supp. 388, 398-99 (E.D.N.Y.1978), aff'd, 603 F.2d 1053 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America, Appellee-Cross v. Michael J. Lohan, Also Known as Michael Desiderio, Defendant-Appellant-Cross
See United States v. Fatico, 603 F.2d 1053 (2d Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rojo-Alvarez
See U.S. v. Fatico, 603 F.2d 1053, 1056-57 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980) (pre-guidelines case holding that out-of-court statements of unidentified informant admissible for sentencing).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ricardo Rodriguez
See United States v. Fatico, 579 F.2d 707, 711-13 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tino Fiumara v. Jerry A. O'brien, Warden, U.S.P. Leavenworth
See United States v. Fatico, 579 F.2d 707 (2nd Cir.1978), on remand, 458 F.Supp. 388 (E.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 603 F.2d 1053 (2nd Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
Drywall Tapers & Pointers of Greater New York, Local 1974 of I.B.P.A.T. v. Local 530 of Operative Plasterers & Cement Masons International Ass'n
See Drywall Tapers & Pointers v. Operative Plasterers’ and Cement Masons’ Int’l Ass’n., 601 F.2d 675 (2d Cir.1979) cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Vaughn Ehret
See United States v. Fatico, 458 F.Supp. 388, 402-06 (E.D.N.Y.1978), aff'd, 603 F.2d 1053 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Giaimo, Martino
See United States v. Fatico, 603 F.2d 1053 , 1057 n. 9 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bernard Weintraub
See United States v. Fatico, 603 F.2d 1053 , 1057 n. 9 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Javier Cifuentes
See United States v. Fatico, 603 F.2d 1053, 1054 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jimmy Ruben Soto
(2×)
See United States v. Fatico, 458 F.Supp. 388, 407 (E.D.N.Y.1978), aff'd, 603 F.2d 1053 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dominic Santarelli
See United States v. Fatico, 603 F.2d 1053 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ralph Borello
See United States v. Fatico, 603 F.2d 1053 , 1057 n. 9 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980) (Fatico II).
discussed
Cited "see"
Louisiana Wildlife Federation, Inc. v. Dennis J. York, Colonel
See Hiatt Grain & Feed, Inc. v. Bergland, 446 F.Supp. 457, 500 (D.Kan.1978), aff’d, 602 F.2d 929 (10th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1019 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980); National Forest Preservation Group v. Butz, 485 F.2d 408, 412 (9th Cir.1973). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Hilo Coast Processing Co. v. United States
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
STANDARD OF REVIEW The parties agree that the standard of review is whether the USDA’s action was “ ‘arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.’ ” Independent Meat Packers Ass’n v. Butz, 526 F.2d 228, 238 (8th Cir.1975) (citations omitted); accord Hiatt Grain & Feed, Inc. v. Bergland, 446 F.Supp. 457, 478 (D.Kan.1978) aff'd, 602 F.2d 929 (10th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1019 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980); see Arlington Oil Mills v. Knebel, 543 F.2d 1092 , 1095 n. 6, 1099 (5th Cir.1976) (promulgation of USDA price suppor…
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Ukiah, California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Sonoma County Water Agency, Intervenor
See Consolidated Gas Supply Corp. v. FERC, 606 F.2d 323, 329 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980) (error not reversible if independent basis for decision exists); Chrysler Corp. v. FTC, 561 F.2d 357, 362-63 (D.C.Cir.1977) (reversal not warranted if procedural error is not prejudicial). 21 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Arthur Hansen
See United States v. Fatico, 603 F.2d 1053 , 1057 & n. 9 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980); Hollis v. Smith, 571 F.2d 685, 694-96 (2d Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Seagrave Corp. v. Vista Resources, Inc.
See Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp., 623 F.2d 786 (2d Cir.1980), aff’d on other grounds, 456 U.S. 461 , 102 S.Ct. 1883 , 72 L.Ed.2d 262 (1982); accord United States v. Fatico, 603 F.2d 1053, 1058 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
The Seagrave Corporation v. Vista Resources, Inc.
See Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp., 623 F.2d 786 (2d Cir.1980), aff'd on other grounds, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 1883 , 72 L.Ed.2d 262 (1982); accord, United States v. Fatico, 603 F.2d 1053, 1058 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980). 6 The district court ruling was made three months before this Court rejected the sale of business doctrine upon which Judge Sweet relied.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James T. Schell
(2×)
See United States v. Fatico, 458 F.Supp. 388, 401 (E.D.N.Y.1978), aff’d, 603 F.2d 1053 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980); cf. Holmes v. United States Board of Parole, 541 F.2d 1243, 1251 (7th Cir. 1976) (prison board’s classification as special offender affects a prisoner’s prospects for parole); Cardaropoli v. Norton, 523 F.2d 990, 994 (2d Cir. 1975) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
Marcus T. Baumann v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Fatico, 458 F.Supp. 388, 396-98 (E.D.N.Y.1978), aff’d, 603 F.2d 1053 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Francis P. Tracey
See United States v. Fatico, 579 F.2d 707, 713 (2d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980); United States v. Harris, 558 F.2d 366, 375 (7th Cir. 1977); United States v. Cardi, 519 F.2d 309, 314 (7th Cir. 1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carpentier
See United States v. Fatico, 579 F.2d 707 (2d Cir. 1978), remanded, 458 F.Supp. 388 (E.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 603 F.2d 1053 (2d Cir. 1979), 2 cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
See Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. United States, 606 F.2d 1131, 1142 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert, denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1019 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
See Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. United States, 606 F.2d 1131, 1142 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1019 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
BD. OF EDUC. OF ST. CHARLES v. Adelman
Super. 315 , 212 A.2d 184 ; Alexander v. Ivey (1963), 1 Ohio App. 2d 249 , 204 N.E.2d 394 ; Las Vegas Supper Club, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (1967), 211 Pa. Super. 385 , 237 A.2d 252 ; Corning Glass Works v. Seaboard Surety Co. (1973), 112 R.I. 241 , 308 A.2d 813 ; Lyndonville Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Peerless Insurance Co. (1967), 126 Vt. 436 , 234 A.2d 340 ; but cf. Jonas v. Northeastern Mutual Fire Insurance Co. (1969), 44 Wis. 2d 347 , 171 N.W.2d 185 (evidence necessary to sustain burden of proof in civil case where act constitutes a crime is middle standard — clear, s…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Olga Valencia and William Suarez Valencia
See United States v. Fatico, 603 F.2d 1053, 1058 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980); Doraiswamy v. Secretary of Labor, 555 F.2d 832 , 847 n.119 (D.C.Cir.1976); Davis v. Estelle, 529 F.2d 437, 441 (5th Cir. 1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Valencia
See United States v. Fatico, 603 F.2d 1053, 1058 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980); Doraiswamy v. Secretary of Labor, 555 F.2d 832 , 847 n.119 (D.C.
cited
Cited "see"
National Pork Producers Council v. Bergland
See Hiatt Grain & Feed, Inc. v. Bergland, 602 F.2d 929, 933 (10th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1019 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Labriola
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 79-774.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 1980.
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Colorado (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.