green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
10.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases ·
…amnesia alone does not render a defendant incompetent to stand trial
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
People v. Stahl
amnesia alone does not render a defendant incompetent to stand trial
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
People v. Stahl
amnesia alone does not render a defendant incompetent to stand trial
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lackey v. State
the jury could credit the testimony of page 154 lay witnesses over that of an expert witness
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Dominguez
See State v. Brown, 93 N.M. 236, 238 , 599 P.2d 389, 392 (Ct.App.), cert. quashed, 93 N.M. 172 , 598 P.2d 215 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1084 , 100 S.Ct. 1041 , 62 L.Ed.2d 769 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Larry Mayes, and Dallas Earl Scott
See United States v. Lawrence, 605 F.2d 1321, 1324-25 (4th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1084 , 100 S.Ct. 1041 , 62 L.Ed.2d 770 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Andes-Mar Pereira Barbosa
See United States v. Martinez-Navarro, 604 F.2d 1184, 1186 (9th Cir.1979) (per curiam), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1084 , 100 S.Ct. 1041 , 62 L.Ed.2d 769 (1980); United States v. Lustig, 555 F.2d 737, 751 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 926 , 98 S.Ct. 408 , 54 L.Ed.2d 285 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Bundy v. Dugger
See United States v. Mota, 598 F.2d 995, 998-1000 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1084 , 100 S.Ct. 1042 , 62 L.Ed.2d 770 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Darrell Lynn Ricks
See United States v. Lawrence, 605 F.2d 1321 (4th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1084 (1980); United States v. Dunlap, 577 F.2d 867 (4th Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Abdulbaqui v. State
See United States v. Mota, 598 F.2d 995, 1001 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1084 , 100 S.Ct. 1042 , 62 L.Ed.2d 770 (1980) (Mota entered a general denial to charges relating to sale of cocaine and Flores entered an insanity plea; counsel for Flores acknowledged in argument that the government’s evidence as to Flores would probably support the prosecutor’s allegations as to what had taken place; held defenses not irreconcilable — Flores introduced no testimony that implicated Mota).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ming Sen Shiue
See United States v. Mota, 598 F.2d 995 , 1000 *923 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1084 , 100 S.Ct. 1042 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. McInnis
See, United States v. Mota, 598 F.2d 995 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1084 , 100 S.Ct. 1042 , 62 L.Ed.2d 770 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Demareo Lamont Davis, United States of America v. Dwayne Buford Reed
United States v. Espinosa, 771 F.2d 1382, 1399-1400 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1023 , 106 S.Ct. 579 , 88 L.Ed.2d 561 (1985); see also United States v. Mota, 598 F.2d 995, 1000-01 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1084 , 100 S.Ct. 1042 , 62 L.Ed.2d 770 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. State
(2×)
See also United States v. Nunez, 877 F.2d 1475, 1478 (10th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 981 , 110 S.Ct. 514 , 107 L.Ed.2d 515 (1989) ("A court should, of course, vigilantly protect a defendant's constitutional rights, but it was never intended that any of these rights be used as a ploy to frustrate the orderly procedures of a court in the administration of justice." (quoting United States v. Lawrence, 605 F.2d 1321, 1325 (4th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1084 , 100 S.Ct. 1041 , 62 L.Ed.2d 770 (1980)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ellis v. State
See also United States v. Mota , 598 F.2d 995 , 999 (5th Cir.) (expert testimony disregarded when based on a single interview through interpreter, in which doctor was unable to verify truth of defendant's statements to him and unable to conduct psychological tests), cert. denied , 444 U.S. 1084 , 100 S.Ct. 1042 , 62 L.Ed.2d 770 (1979); United States v. Makris , 535 F.2d [899, 908 (5th Cir. 1976)] (disregarding expert opinion on competency in part because doctors relied only on statements by defendant and they were not aware of defendant's legal problems); Mims v. United States , 375 F.2d at 14…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marion Van Horn, Scott Bertelsen, Gary Balough, Dennis Kay, Robert Van Horn, Dennis Cason, Thomas Sikes, John Crosby Bertelsen, Joseph William Campbell, United States of America v. William Joseph Harvey, A/K/A Billy
See also United States v. Mota, 598 F.2d 995, 1000-01 (5th Cir.1979) (defense of insanity not irreconcilable with codefendant's defense of noninvolvement),cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1084 , 100 S.Ct. 1042 , 62 L.Ed.2d 770 (1980). 61 Compelling prejudice did not exist in this case.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Van Horn
See also United States v. Mota, 598 F.2d 995, 1000-01 (5th Cir.1979) (defense of insanity not irreconcilable with codefendant’s defense of noninvolvement), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1084 , 100 S.Ct. 1042 , 62 L.Ed.2d 770 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marvin Neal Smith
See also United States v. Lawrence, 605 F.2d 1321, 1325 (4th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1084 , 100 S.Ct. 1041 , 62 L.Ed.2d 770 (1980); United States v. Dunlap, 577 F.2d 867, 869 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 858 , 99 S.Ct. 174 , 58 L.Ed.2d 166 (1978); Armant v. Marquez, 772 F.2d 552, 556 (9th Cir.1985) (denial of defendant’s continuance motion made for the purpose of allowing him to proceed pro se is reviewable for an abuse of discretion). 1 Under either standard of review we hold that it was not error under these circumstances to deny Smith’s request to proceed pro se.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Elmer Keck, Larry Hill, Diane Hise, Diana Elliott, Terry Beasley, and Debbie Hill
See, e.g., United States v. Mota, 598 F.2d 995, 1001 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1084 , 100 S.Ct. 1042 , 62 L.Ed.2d 770 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Holland
See also United States v. Martinez-Navarro, 604 F.2d 1184 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied sub nom, Enriques-Sanchez v. United States, 444 U.S. 1084 , 100 S.Ct. 1041 , 62 L.Ed.2d 769 (1980) (punishment should be individualized, fitting offender as well as crime); United States v. Lania, 9 M.J. 100 (C.M.A.1980) (court-martial must individualize consideration of sentence, including circumstances of case and character and propensities of accused). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert William Strickland v. Robert Francis, Warden
See also United States v. Mota, 598 F.2d 995, 999 (5th Cir.) (expert testimony disregarded when based on single interview through interpreter, in which doctor was unable to verify truth of defendant’s statements to him and unable to conduct psychological tests), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1084 , 100 S.Ct. 1042 , 62 L.Ed.2d 770 (1979); United States v. Makris, 535 F.2d at 908 (disregarding expert opinion on competency in part because doctors relied only on statements by defendant and they were not aware of defendant’s legal problems); Mims v. United States, 375 F.2d at 145 (significant in uphol…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bentley v. State
See also United States v. Lawrence, 605 F.2d 1321 (4th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1084 , 100 S.Ct. 1041 , 62 L.Ed.2d 770 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Lee White v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections
See, e.g., United States v. Mota, 598 F.2d 995, 998-1000 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1084 , 100 S.Ct. 1042 , 62 L.Ed.2d 770 (1979) (testimony of lay witnesses, DEA agents, rebutting uncontradicted testimony of an expert psychiatric witness sufficient, as a matter of law, to present question to jury); United States v. Collier, 453 F.2d 1173 (5th Cir. 1972) (ten lay witnesses supporting government’s claim of sanity did not, as a matter of law, sufficiently rebut testimony of seven psychiatrists who had all concluded defendant was insane); Brock v. United States, 387 F.2d 254 (5th Cir. 1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Willie James Brown v. Louie L. Wainwright, Etc.
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Lawrence, 605 F.2d 1321 (4th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1084 , 100 S.Ct. 1041 , 62 L.Ed.2d 770 (1980); United States v. Dunlap, 577 F.2d 867 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 858 , 99 S.Ct. 174 , 58 L.Ed.2d 166 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bennett v. State
See also United States v. Lawrence, 605 F.2d 1321 (4th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1084 , 100 S.Ct. 1041 , 62 L.Ed.2d 720 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mayfield
v.
Mohn, Penitentiary Superintendent
v.
Mohn, Penitentiary Superintendent
No. 79-5590.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 1980.
Sup. Ct. App. W. Ya. Certiorari denied.