Donofrio v. Marshall, 444 U.S. 1102 (1980). · Go Syfert
Search
Donofrio v. Marshall, 444 U.S. 1102 (1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“to be 'final' for purposes of collateral estoppel the decision need only be immune, as a practical matter, to reversal or amendment. 'finality' in the sense of is not required.”
138 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 43 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Richard N. Bell v. Cameron Taylor (ca7, 2016-07-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Richard N. Bell v. Cameron Taylor
7th Cir. · 2016 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
to be 'final' for purposes of collateral estoppel the decision need only be immune, as a practical matter, to reversal or amendment. 'finality' in the sense of is not required.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Shoreline Alliance v. Tennessee Valley Authority
W.D. Tenn. · 2013 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
so long as the service provides a special benefit, above and beyond that which accrues to the public at large, to a readily-identifiable individual, the fee is permissible.
cited Cited as authority (rule) In Re Cenco Inc. Securities Litigation
N.D. Ill. · 1982 · confidence medium
Schutz Brewing Company, 605 F.2d 990, 996 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100'S.Ct. 1067, 62 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980); Dunlap v. City of Chicago, 435 F.Supp. 1295, 1299 (N.D.Ill.1977).
cited Cited "see" Cabble v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See, United States v. Diana, 605 F.2d 1307, 1312 ([4]th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1067 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980).” 667 F.2d at 1178-79 (footnote omitted).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. All Right, Title & Interest in Five Parcels of Real Property (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
cited Cited "see" B.N.E. Swedbank, S.A. v. Banker
S.D.N.Y. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Miller Brewing Co. v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co., 605 F.2d 990, 995-96 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1067 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980); Lummus Co., 297 F.2d at 89 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Gerena
D. Conn. · 1988 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord United States v. Diana, 605 F.2d 1307, 1312 (4th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1067 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980).
discussed Cited "see" Scott v. United States
M.D. Tenn. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Diana, 605 F.2d 1307 (4th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1067 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 ; United States v. Caggiano, 667 F.2d 1176 (5th Cir.1982); United States v. Lawson, 545 F.2d 557 (7th Cir.1975); United States v. Civella, 533 F.2d 1395 (8th Cir.1976). 15 .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Gerald F. Johnson, United States of America v. Thomas Johnson, United States of America v. Edward T. Wooten (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
Sec. 2518 (3)(c) (1976) 55 See June Application, App. 84-107 56 See United States v. Martinez, 588 F.2d 1227, 1231-32 (9th Cir.1978); United States v. Vento, 533 F.2d at 849-50 ; United States v. Kalustian, 529 F.2d 585, 589-90 (9th Cir.1975); NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR THE REVIEW OF FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS RELATING TO WIRETAPPING AND ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE, ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE 14 (1976) 57 United States v. Wooten, mem. op. at 5, reprinted in App. 21 58 E.g., United States v. Diadone, 558 F.2d 775, 780 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1064 , 98 S.Ct. 1239 , 55 L.Ed.2d 765 (1978); United…
cited Cited "see" People v. Nieves
Ill. · 1982 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, United States v. Diana (4th Cir. 1979), 605 F.2d 1307 , 1315, cert. denied (1980), 444 U.S. 1102 , 62 L.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Louis Anthony Caggiano and Robert Edward Napolitano, A/K/A \Bobby Napp\""
5th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See, United States v. Diana, 605 F.2d 1307 , 1312 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1067 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Brandt v. R & D Trucking Co., Inc. (In Re Lissner Corp.)
N.D. Ill. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Miller Brewing Co. v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co., 605 F.2d 990, 996 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1067 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Florida Power & Light Company v. United States of America and Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Wisconsin Electric Power Company v. United States of America and Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Arkansas Power & Light Company v. United States of America and Nuclear Regulatory Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, 601 F.2d 223 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1066 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Florida Power & Light Co. v. United States
D.C. Cir. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, 601 F.2d 223 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1066 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Mosko
D. Colo. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, United States v. Diana, 605 F.2d 1307, 1315-1316 (4th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1067 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980)(fact that defendant produced no evidence that tapes were altered or tampered with was important factor in decision to admit evidence).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Persico
S.D.N.Y. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. McGrath, 622 F.2d 36, 43 (2d Cir.1980) (eight day delay excused where there was no evidence of prejudice to defendant or foul play); Vazquez, 605 F.2d at 1279 (seven to thirteen day delays excused where no bad faith on part of the government was found); Scafidi, 564 F.2d at 641 (seven day delay excused since it was not the result of any attempt to avoid sealing requirement or gain a tactical advantage); Fury, 554 F.2d at 533 (six days excused); United States v. Poeta, 455 F.2d 117, 122 (2d Cir.) (thirteen days excused), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 948 , 92 S.Ct. 2041 , 3…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sohio Transportation Company v. The United States
Fed. Cir. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Mississippi Power & Light v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n (NRC), 601 F.2d 223 (5th Cir.1979), cert, denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1066 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980) (NRC empowered under IOAA to charge for EIS because EIS is prerequisite for license and part of cost of providing special benefit to licensee). 12 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Gambale
D. Mass. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Diana, 605 F.2d 1307, 1315 (4th Cir.1979) (“No reason is apparent why the government could not have obtained a court order to unseal the specific tapes it needed.”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1067 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor v. Carolina Stalite Company, (Two Cases.)
D.C. Cir. · 1984 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Marshall v. Donofrio, 465 F.Supp. 838, 839 (E.D.Pa.1978), aff'd mem., 605 F.2d 1196 (3d Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1067 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980); Secretary of Labor v. Waukesha Lime & Stone Co., 3 F.M.S.H.R.C. 1702, 1703-04 (1981); Secretary of Labor v. Baker Coal Co., 2 F.M.S.H.R.C. 2626, 2628 (1980). 3 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Alfred M. Lawson
4th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Diana, 605 F.2d 1307 (4th Cir. 1979), cert. denied 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1067 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980); United States v. Calabro, 467 F.2d 973 (2d Cir. 1972) cert. denied Tortorello v. United States, 410 U.S. 926 , 93 S.Ct. 1357 , 35 L.Ed.2d 587 (1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Donofrio
v.
Marshall, Secretary of Labor
No. 79-848.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 1980.
444 U.S. 1102
Certiorari.
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 75%
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (1) · W.D. Tennessee (1)

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Powell would grant certiorari.