green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1986 ·
…a complaint must indicate that not only the injury but the discrimination is in fact ongoing
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Santos v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center
(2×)
a complaint must indicate that not only the injury but the discrimination is in fact ongoing
discussed
Cited "see"
Welsh v. Nebraska, Nebraska Brand Committee
(2×)
See Goldman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 607 F.2d 1014, 1017-18 (1st Cir.1979) (and cases cited therein), ce rt. denied, 445 U.S. 929 , 100 S.Ct. 1317 , 63 L.Ed.2d 762 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sarit v. Drug Enforcement Administration
(2×)
See Continental Casualty v. Canadian Universal Insurance Co., 605 F.2d 1340, 1343 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 929 , 100 S.Ct. 1317 , 63 L.Ed.2d 762 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Torres v. Padilla
(2×)
See generally, Goldman v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 607 F.2d 1014 (1st Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 929 , 100 S.Ct. 1317 , 63 L.Ed.2d 762 (1980), Williams v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 665 F.2d 918 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 971 , 103 S.Ct. 302 , 74 L.Ed.2d 283 (1982); Tarvesian v. Carr Division of TRW, Inc., 407 F.Supp. 336 (D.Mass.1976), or that the filing of the action at the Puerto Rico Superior Court interrupted the running of the statute of limitations, see De Jesús Martínez v. Chardón 85 JTS 20 and Durán Cepeda v. Morales Lebrón, 112 D.P.R. 623 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Iris McKinney v. Honorable Elizabeth Dole, Secretary of Transportation
(2×)
See Carroll v. Talman Federal S & L Ass’n, 604 F.2d 1028 , 1032-1033 & n. 13 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 929 , 100 S.Ct. 1316 , 63 L.Ed.2d 762 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Valente v. Moore Business Forms, Inc.
(2×)
See Goldman v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 607 F.2d 1014 , *1289 1017 (1st Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 929 , 100 S.Ct. 1317 , 63 L.Ed.2d 762 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Velazquez v. Chardon
(2×)
See generally, Goldman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 607 F.2d 1014 (1st Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 929 , 100 S.Ct. 1317 , 63 L.Ed.2d 762 (1980); Williams v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 665 F.2d 918 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 302 , 74 L.Ed.2d 283 (1982); Tarvesian v. Carr Division of TRW, Inc., 407 F.Supp. 336 (D.Mass.1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richards v. NEW YORK STATE DEPT. OF CORR. SERVICES
(2×)
See Goldman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 607 F.2d 1014, 1018 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 929 , 100 S.Ct. 1317 , 63 L.Ed.2d 762 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richards v. New York State Department of Correctional Services
(2×)
See Goldman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 607 F.2d 1014, 1018 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 929 , 100 S.Ct. 1317 , 63 L.Ed.2d 762 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Louise Lamphere v. Brown University, Claire Rosenfield, Claimant-Appellant
(2×)
Cal.1977); see generally Goldman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 607 F.2d 1014, 1017-19 (1st Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 929 , 100 S.Ct. 1317 , 63 L.Ed.2d 762 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Anderson v. Paccar, Inc.
See Goldman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 607 F.2d 1014 (1st Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 929 , 100 S.Ct. 1317 , 63 L.Ed.2d 672 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert P. McCarney and Elizabeth H. McCarney v. Ford Motor Company
(2×)
See Continental Casualty Co. v. Canadian Universal Insurance Co., 605 F.2d 1340 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 929 , 100 S.Ct. 1317 , 63 L.Ed.2d 762 (1980) (see also the companion case of Fenner v. Continental Diving Service, Inc., 543 F.2d 1113 (5th Cir. 1976)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rafael Rivera Fernandez v. Carlos Chardon, Etc.
(2×)
See Goldman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 607 F.2d 1014 (1st Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 929 , 100 S.Ct. 1317 , 63 L.Ed.2d 762 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Martin Rivera-Gomez v. Rafael Adolfo De Castro
(2×)
See, e.g., Goldman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 607 F.2d 1014, 1018 (1st Cir.1979) (if the injury and the discrimination are ongoing, limitations clock does not begin to tick until discriminatory conduct ends), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 929 , 100 S.Ct. 1317 , 63 L.Ed.2d 762 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marley v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
See, e.g., Carroll v. Talman Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, 604 F.2d 1028 , 1032-33 & n. 13 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 929 , 100 S.Ct. 1316 , 63 L.Ed.2d 762 (1980) (requiring female bank employees to wear uniforms while allowing male employees to choose their own attire violates Title VII by reinforcing demeaning sexual stereotypes; the court noted that "terms and conditions of employment” refers to more than tangible economic compensation and benefits).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Goldman
v.
Sears, Roebuck & Co.
v.
Sears, Roebuck & Co.
No. 79-1134.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 17, 1980.
Published
Citer courts: N.D. Illinois (2)
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.