green
Positive treatment
8.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Corren v. Condos
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Republican Nat'l Comm. v. FEC , 487 F.Supp. 280 (S.D.N.Y.) (three-judge court) (" RNC II "), aff'd mem. , 445 U.S. 955 , 100 S.Ct. 1639 , 64 L.Ed.2d 231 (1980) ; see also Republican Nat'l Comm. v. FEC , 616 F.2d 1 , 2 (2d Cir.) (en banc) (holding that challenged provisions of FECA were constitutional for the reasons set forth in RNC II ), aff'd mem. , 445 U.S. 955 , 100 S.Ct. 1639 , 64 L.Ed.2d 231 (1980). 3 In that case, the Republican *219 National Committee ("RNC") challenged the system's $20,000,000 cap on the expenditures of PFCs seeking the presidency (which, as noted above, Buckley d…
discussed
Cited "see"
Corren v. Donovan
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Republican Nat’l Comm. v. FEC, 487 F. Supp. 280 (S.D.N.Y.) (three‐judge court) (“RNC II”), aff’d mem., 445 U.S. 955 (1980); see also Republican Nat’l Comm. v. FEC, 616 F.2d 1, 2 (2d Cir.) (en banc) (holding that challenged provisions of FECA were constitutional 18 for the reasons set forth in RNC II), aff’d mem., 445 U.S. 955 (1980).3 In that case, the Republican National Committee (“RNC”) challenged the system’s $20,000,000 cap on the expenditures of PFCs seeking the presidency (which, as noted above, Buckley distinguished from the general expenditure caps that it foun…
cited
Cited "see"
Daggett v. Webster
Accord Republican Nat’l Comm. v. FEC, 487 F.Supp. 280, 284 (S.D.N.Y.) (three-judge panel), aff'd, 445 U.S. 955 , 100 S.Ct. 1639 , 64 L.Ed.2d 231 (1980) (Mem.).
cited
Cited "see"
Sunwest Silver, Inc. v. International Connection, Inc.
See Attwell v. LaSalle Nat’l Bank, 607 F.2d 1157, 1161 (5th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 445 U.S. 954 , 100 S.Ct. 1607 , 63 L.Ed.2d 791 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lacey
(2×)
See United States v. Alanis, 611 F.2d 123 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 955 , 100 S.Ct. 1607 , 63 L.Ed.2d 791 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Steven Andre Hill
See United States v. McQuin, 612 F.2d 1193, 1195-96 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 955 (1980); United States v. Winslow, 962 F.2d 845, 849 (9th Cir.1992) (payment to informant of $90,000 did not constitute outrageous governmental conduct); United States v. Olson, 978 F.2d 1472, 1482 (7th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 1614 (1993) (the use of a contingent fee is not on its face outrageous).
discussed
Cited "see"
People in Interest of MN
(2×)
Appellants here can only complain that they were taken in by the agents' well practiced disguise. 539 F.2d at 1239-40 (citations omitted) (quoting United States v. Russell, 411 U.S. 423, 432 , 93 S.Ct. 1637, 1643 , 36 L.Ed.2d 366 (1973)); see United States v. McQuin, 612 F.2d 1193 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 955 , 100 S.Ct. 1608 , 63 L.Ed.2d 791 (1980) (actions of FBI informant who told *1129 the defendant that another agent would kill him if he did not go through with the planned robbery held not to be outrageous conduct); see also United States v. Bowling, 666 F.2d 1052 (6th Cir.1981)…
discussed
Cited "see"
People ex rel. M.N.
(2×)
Appellants here can only complain that they were taken in by the agents’ well practiced disguise. 539 F.2d at 1239-40 (citations omitted) (quoting United States v. Russell, 411 U.S. 423, 432 , 93 S.Ct. 1637, 1643 , 36 L.Ed.2d 366 (1973)); see United States v. McQuin, 612 F.2d 1193 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 955 , 100 S.Ct. 1608 , 63 L.Ed.2d 791 (1980) (actions of FBI informant who told the defendant that another agent would kill him if he did not go through with the planned robbery held not to be outrageous conduct); see also United States v. Bowling, 666 F.2d 1052 (6th Cir.1981), ce…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Paul Scott
(2×)
Accord, United States v. McQuin, 612 F.2d 1193, 1196 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 955 , 100 S.Ct. 1608 , 63 L.Ed.2d 791 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Hudson Drydocks Inc., a Louisiana Corporation (Formerly Vic's Shipyard, Inc.) v. Wyatt Yachts Inc., a Florida Corporation
Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a); see Attwell v. LaSalle National Bank, 607 F.2d 1157 , 1161—62 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 954 , 100 S.Ct. 1607 , 63 L.Ed.2d 791 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mid-States Aircraft Engines, Inc. v. Mize Co.
Accord, Attwell v. LaSalle National Bank, (5th Cir.1979) 607 F.2d 1157, 1161 , cert. denied (1980) 445 U.S. 954 , 100 S.Ct. 1607 , 63 L.Ed.2d 791 ; O'Donnell v. Wien Air Alaska, Inc., (9th Cir.1977) 551 F.2d 1141 , 1145, n. 4; Hubicki v. AFC Industries, Inc., (3rd Cir.1973) 484 F.2d 519, 522-23 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Phillips v. Electrical Constructors of America, Inc.
See, Attwell v. LaSalle National Bank, 607 F.2d 1157, 1160 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 954 , 100 S.Ct. 1607 , 63 L.Ed.2d 791 (1980); Benjamin v. Western Boat Building Corp., 472 F.2d 723 (5th Cir. 1973); cert. denied, 414 U.S. 830 , 94 S.Ct. 60 , 38 L.Ed.2d 64 (1973); Buckley v. New York Times Co., 338 F.2d 470 (5th Cir. 1964).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Wendall Dearmore
See United States v. McQuin, 612 F.2d 1193 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 954 , 955, 100 S.Ct. 1607 , 1608, 63 L.Ed.2d 791 (1980).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony Anthon
(4×)
See United States v. Alanis, 611 F.2d 123 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 955 , 100 S.Ct. 1607 , 63 L.Ed.2d 791 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Common Cause v. Schmitt
See Republican National Committee v. Federal Election Commission, 487 F.Supp. 280, 285-86 (S.D.N.Y.) (three-judge court), aff’d summarily, 445 U.S. 955 , 100 S.Ct. 1639 , 64 L.Ed.2d 231 (1980). 33 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vote Choice v. Di Stefano
See Buckley, 424 U.S. at 85-109 ; see also Republican Nat'l Comm. v. FEC, 487 F. Supp. 280, 283-86 (S.D.N.Y.) (three-judge court) (RNC I), aff'd mem., 445 U.S. 955 (1980); Republican Nat'l Comm. v. FEC, 616 F.2d 1, 2 (2d Cir.) (en banc) (adopting reasoning of RNC I in parallel proceeding), aff'd mem., 445 U.S. 955 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vote Choice v. Di Stefano
See Buckley, 424 U.S. at 85-109 ; see also ___ _______ ___ ____ Republican Nat'l Comm. v. FEC, 487 F. Supp. 280 , 283-86 ________________________ ___ (S.D.N.Y.) (three-judge court) (RNC I), aff'd mem., 445 U.S. 955 _____ _____ ____ (1980); Republican Nat'l Comm. v. FEC, 616 F.2d 1, 2 (2d Cir.) _______________________ ___ (en banc) (adopting reasoning of RNC I in parallel proceeding), __ ____ ______ aff'd mem., 445 U.S. 955 (1980). _____ ____ In a Briarean effort to scale this barrier, Leonard attempts to distinguish the public financing cases on the ground that they involve the propriety of co…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vote Choice, Inc. v. Joseph Distefano, Etc., Elizabeth Leonard, Vote Choice, Inc. v. Joseph Distefano, Etc.
See Buckley, 424 U.S. at 85-109 , 96 S.Ct. at 666-677 ; see also Republican Nat’l Comm. v. FEC, 487 F.Supp. 280, 283-86 (S.D.N.Y.) (three-judge court) (RNC I), aff'd mem., 445 U.S. 955 , 100 S.Ct. 1639 , 64 L.Ed.2d 231 (1980); Republican Nat’l Comm. v. FEC, 616 F.2d 1, 2 (2d Cir.) (en banc) (adopting reasoning of RNC I in parallel proceeding), aff'd mem., 445 U.S. 955 , 100 S.Ct. 1639 , 64 L.Ed.2d 231 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of New York v. Sullivan
See also DKT Memorial Fund, 887 F.2d at 286-287 . 44 We also note that the decision in Republican Nat'l Comm. v. Federal Election Comm'n, 487 F.Supp. 280 (S.D.N.Y.1980) [hereinafter RNC ], certified questions answered, 616 F.2d 1 (2d Cir.1980), aff'd, 445 U.S. 955 , 100 S.Ct. 1639 , 64 L.Ed.2d 231 (1980), supports our conclusion.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,775 Carol Morris, Administratrix of the Estate of Linda Louise Grimes, Deceased v. Sse, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Attwell v. LaSalle National Bank, 607 F.2d 1157, 1160 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied 445 U.S. 954 , 100 S.Ct. 1607 , 63 L.Ed.2d 791 (1980); Gold Kist Inc. v. Baskin-Robbins Ice Cream Co., 623 F.2d 375, 377 (5th Cir.1980); Bankhead Enterprises, Inc. v. Norfolk and W.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Valdovinois-Valdovinois
(2×)
See also United States v. McQuin, 612 F.2d 1193, 1196 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 955 , 100 S.Ct. 1608 , 63 L.Ed.2d 791 (1980); United States v. Prairie, 572 F.2d at 1319 ; United States v. Gonzales, 539 F.2d 1238 , 1240 n. 1 (9th Cir.1976). 6 Furthermore, unlike entrapment, indicia of a defendant’s predisposition are irrelevant to the issue of outrageous government conduct.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Vanzandt
(2×)
United States v. Hammond, 598 F.2d 1008, 1011 (5th Cir.1979); see also United States v. Till, 609 F.2d 228 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 955 , 100 S.Ct. 1607 , 63 L.Ed.2d 791 (1980). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Arundar v. Staff Builders Temporary Personnel, Inc.
See, e.g., Attwell v. La Salle National Bank, 607 F.2d 1157, 1159 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 954 , 100 S.Ct. 1607 , 63 L.Ed.2d 791 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Leonard O. Bowling
(2×)
See also, e.g., United States v. McQuin, 612 F.2d 1193, 1195 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 954 , 100 S.Ct. 1607 , 63 L.Ed.2d 791 (1980) (infiltration of criminal ranks by government long recognized as permissible); United States v. Twigg, 588 F.2d 373, 380 (3rd Cir. 1978) (infiltration of criminal operations is an "accepted and necessary practice"); and United States v. Prairie, 572 F.2d 1316, 1319 (9th Cir. 1978), and cases cited therein. 19 This proposition remains true even though the informant or government agent engages in some criminal activity or supplies something of value to the …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Norbert A. Brown
See also, e. g., United States v. McQuin, 612 F.2d 1193, 1195 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 954 , 100 S.Ct. 1607 , 63 L.Ed.2d 791 (1980) (infiltration of criminal ranks by government long recognized as permissible); United States v. Twigg, 588 F.2d 373, 380 (3rd Cir. 1978) (infiltration of criminal operations is an “accepted and necessary practice”); and United States v. Prairie, 572 F.2d 1316, 1319 (9th Cir. 1978), and cases cited therein.
Alanis
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 79-6185.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 31, 1980.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.