green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.3 score
“there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in halls and common areas of apartment buildings”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Murdock Head, (Two Cases)
See id. at 659 , 97 S.Ct. at 2040 (contrasting, for appealability purposes, double jeopardy and evidence suppression rulings); United States v. Powell, 632 F.2d 754, 758 (9th Cir.1980) (refusal to limit proof on collateral estoppel grounds not immediately appealable); United States v. Mock, 604 F.2d 336, 338-40 (5th Cir.1979) (same); but cf. United States v. Larkin, 605 F.2d 1360 (5th Cir.1979) (interlocutory appealability assumed though collateral estoppel would merely restrict proof), modified on other grounds, 611 F.2d 585 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 939 , 100 S.Ct. 2160 , 64 L.Ed.2d…
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Acosta
there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in halls and common areas of apartment buildings
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rosario-Peralta
See United States v. Izzi, 613 F.2d 1205 , 1213 (1st Cir.) (citing United States v. McGovern, 499 F.2d 1140, 1143 (1st Cir. 1974)), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rosario-Peralta
(2×)
See United States v. Izzi, 613 F.2d 1205, 1213 (1st Cir.) (citing United States v. McGovern, 499 F.2d 1140, 1143 (1st Cir.1974)), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2162 , 64 L.Ed.2d 793 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cruz Rosario-Peralta, A/K/A Crescencio Cedeno-Peralta, United States v. Johnny David Diaz-Morla, United States v. Ramon Antonio Javier
(2×)
See United States v. Izzi, 613 F.2d 1205, 1213 (1st Cir.) (citing United States v. McGovern, 499 F.2d 1140, 1143 (1st Cir.1974)), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2162 , 64 L.Ed.2d 793 (1980). 18 B.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Taylor
See United States v. Cambindo Valencia, 609 F.2d 603, 625 (1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed.2d 795 (1980) 10 His conclusions were then applied to the sentencing of Richards and Alonso
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Taylor
See United States v. Cambindo Valencia, 609 F.2d 603, 625 (1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed.2d 795 (1980). .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Escobar-Orejuela
See United States v. Cambindo Valencia, 609 F.2d 603 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, Prado v. United States, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed.2d 795 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
People v. Parker
See People v. Spicer (1979), 79 Ill. 2d 173 , 402 N.E.2d 169 , cert. denied (1980), 446 U.S. 940 , 64 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gethers v. United States
See United States v. Cambindo Valencia, 609 F.2d 603, 625 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed.2d 795 (1979); cf. United States v. Losada, 674 F.2d 167, 170 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1125 , 102 S.Ct. 2945 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1341 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ryan
See United States v. Cambindo Valencia, 609 F.2d 603, 625 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Luis Bueno-Risquet, Marta Pinto-Rodriguez, Maria Torres, Esteban Zarate, Juan Jose Quinones and Carmen Pinto
See United States v. Cambindo Valencia, 609 F.2d 603, 633 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed.2d 795 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Darby
See 469 F. Supp. 323 (S.D.N.Y. 1978), aff'd 607 F. 2d 559 (2 Cir.1979), cert. den. 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed. 2d 794 (1980). [3] The original comment to the rule was published in the Report of the Supreme Court Committee on the Model Rules of Professional Conduct included as a supplement to the New Jersey Law Journal of July 28, 1983. [4] The 1984 comment to the rule was published as a supplement to the New Jersey Law Journal of July 19, 1984. [5] It would by no means follow that even if the statement was improperly admitted the conviction would be reversed.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Chen
See generally United States v. Cambindo Valencia, 609 F.2d 603, 621-29 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed.2d 795 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Payden
Under Rule 801(d)(2)(E), before a jury may consider out of court statements by a third party against a defendant, this court must be satisfied by a fair preponderance of the independent non-hearsay evidence that the defendant and the third-party declarant were in fact members of the same conspiracy, United States v. Geaney, 417 F.2d 1116, 1120 (2d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1028 , 90 S.Ct. 1276 , 25 L.Ed.2d 539 (1970); see United States v. Cicale, 691 F.2d 95, 103-04 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1771 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983), and that this conspiracy is the cons…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Smith
See Annot. 56 A.L.R.Fed. 168 § 5 (1982), United States v. Cambindo Valencia, 609 F.2d 603 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed.2d 795 (1980); United States v. Grady, 544 F.2d 598 (2d Cir.1976); see also United States v. Neff, 615 F.2d 1235 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3018 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1117 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William K. McGrane
See United States v. Luschen, 614 F.2d 1164, 1173 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 939 , 100 S.Ct. 2161 , 64 L.Ed.2d 793 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jeffrey Dewayne Lee, United States of America v. James Edward Nettle, United States of America v. Ed Paquette, United States of America v. One Piper Navajo Model Pa 31
See United States v. Luschen, 614 F.2d 1164, 1172 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 939 , 100 S.Ct. 2161 , 64 L.Ed.2d 793 (1980); cf. Rugendorf v. United States, 376 U.S. 528, 533 , 84 S.Ct. 825, 828 , 11 L.Ed.2d 887 (1964) ("Since the erroneous statements * * * were not those of the affiant, they fail to show that the affiant was in bad faith or that he made any misrepresentations * * * in securing the search warrant.").
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lee
See United States v. Luschen, 614 F.2d 1164, 1172 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 939 , 100 S.Ct. 2161 , 64 L.Ed.2d 793 (1980); cf. Rugendorf v. United States, 376 U.S. 528, 533 , 84 S.Ct. 825, 828 , 11 L.Ed.2d 887 (1964) (“Since the erroneous statements * * ' were not those of the affiant, they fail to show that the affiant was in bad faith or that he made any misrepresentations * * * in securing the search warrant.”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony T. Mulherin, Jr., Harvey E. Hornsby, Robert A. Holliday, Henry Mulherin, Elizabeth Moore
See U.S. v. Larkin, 605 F.2d 1360, 1369 (5th Cir.1979), modified on rehearing, 611 F.2d 585 , cert. denied, 446 U.S. 939 , 100 S.Ct. 2160 , 64 L.Ed.2d 793 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ignacio Perez, United States of America v. Luis Quintero
See United States v. Luschen, 614 F.2d 1164 , 1169 n. 2 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 939 , 100 S.Ct. 2161 , 64 L.Ed.2d 793 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Frederick Swayne
(2×)
See United States v. Luschen, 614 F.2d 1164,1171 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 939 , 100 S.Ct. 2161 , 64 L.Ed.2d 793 (1980); United States v. Neumann, 585 F.2d 355, 357 (8th Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gregory J. Wentz, United States of America v. John David Rodgers
See United States v. Luschen, 614 F.2d 1164, 1171 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 939 , 100 S.Ct. 2161 , 64 L.Ed.2d 793 (1980); United States v. Neumann, 585 F.2d 355, 357 (8th Cir. 1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald Gene Booth
See United States v. Rubies, 612 F.2d 397 , 404 n.8 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2162 , 64 L.Ed.2d 794 (1980).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Friedland, David, in No. 80-2052 United States of America v. Friedland, Jacob, in No. 80-2053
(4×)
See United States v. Izzi, 613 F.2d 1205, 1210-11 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, Santos v. U. S„ 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2162 , 64 L.Ed.2d 793 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Vincent Martino, John Torrioni, Policardo Despaigne, A/K/A \Paulie
(2×)
See generally United States v. Cambindo Valencia, 609 F.2d 603, 621-29 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed.2d 795 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Tashjian, United States of America v. James Campbell
(2×)
See United States v. Izzi, 613 F.2d 1205 , 1212-13 (1st Cir.), cert, denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2162 , 64 L.Ed.2d 793 (1980); United States v. Principe, 499 F.2d 1135, 1139 (1st Cir. 1974); United States v. McGovern, 499 F.2d 1140, 1143 (1st Cir. 1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Leroy Perry, Leroy Butler, Charles Cameron, Donald Dewees, Arthur Gibbons, and Willie Earl Patterson
See Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750 , 66 S.Ct. 1239 , 90 L.Ed. 1557 (1946) (similarity of illegal purpose of each spoke in dealing with hub does not constitute a common purpose and a conspiracy among the spokes). 25 Thus here, as in United States v. Cambindo Valencia, 609 F.2d 603, 626 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed.2d 795 (1980), the Government appears to have presented a series of transactions involving at least two groups who were, if anything, "friendly" competitors in the Harlem drug trade, and who were not fused into a single enterprise des…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Reyes
Deterrence is also one of the goals supporting the requirement that the fruits of the poisonous tree be suppressed: when there is a close causal connection between illegal conduct and evidence obtained as a result of that conduct, “not only is exclusion of the evidence more likely to deter similar police misconduct in the future, but use of the evidence is more likely to compromise the integrity of the courts.” Dunaway v. New York, 442 U.S. 200, 218 , 99 S.Ct. 2248, 2259 , 60 L.Ed.2d 824 (1979); see also United States v. Preston, 608 F.2d 626, 633 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Crago
See, e.g., United States v. Larkin (C.A.5, 1979), 605 F.2d 1360, 1370 , certiorari denied (1980), 446 U.S. 939 , 100 S.Ct. 2160 , 64 L.Ed.2d 793 (where jury failed to reach verdict on conspiracy count, but acquitted defendant on substantive counts, court held that collateral estoppel did not bar retrial of conspiracy count because “[n]o rational jury could have absolved Larkin of liability for * * * [the co-defendant’s] crimes because of the absence of a conspiracy between the two, while it simultaneously failed to acquit Larkin on the conspiracy charge itself.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Calloway
See also United States v. Callabrass, 607 F.2d 559 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed.2d 794 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gennaro J. Angiulo, Donato F. Angiulo, Samuel S. Granito, Francesco J. Angiulo and Michele A. Angiulo
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Monaco, 702 F.2d 860, 878 (11th Cir.1983); United States v. Mastropieri, 685 F.2d 776, 790 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 260 , 74 L.Ed.2d 203 (1982); United States v. Bulman, 667 F.2d 1374 , 1379 n. 5 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1010 , 102 S.Ct. 2305 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1982); United States v. Fontanez, 628 F.2d 687, 689 (1st Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 935 , 101 S.Ct. 1401 , 67 L.Ed.2d 371 (1981); see also United States v. Izzi, 613 F.2d 1205, 1211 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2162 , 64 L.Ed.2d 793 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cyril Melton
See, e.g., State v. Preston, 608 F.2d 626, 639 (5th Cir.1979) cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2162 , 64 L.Ed.2d 794 (1980) (requiring that such a finding be on the record).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rubiel Marin-Cifuentes, United States of America v. Dairo Jesus Rios, United States of America v. Leonardo H. Quitian
See also United States v. Luschen, 614 F.2d 1164 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 939 , 100 S.Ct. 2161 , 64 L.Ed.2d 793 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cresswell v. Sullivan & Cromwell
See, e.g., Layfield v. Bill Heard Chevrolet Co., 607 F.2d 1097, 1098-99 (5th Cir.1979) (per curiam), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 939 , 100 S.Ct. 2161 , 64 L.Ed.2d 793 (1980); Kirby v. P.R.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Isabel G. Hernandez
It is by no means necessary, however: An arrest is "proper even though the arresting officer ... received the information [establishing probable cause] from another officer.” De Los Santos, 810 F.2d at 1336 ; see also United States v. Preston, 608 F.2d 626 , 632 n. 5 (5th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2162 , 64 L.Ed.2d 794 (1980). 13 .Supra note 12. 14 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Chester Aurelio Walker
Compare United States v. Preston, 608 F.2d 626, 638-40 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2162 , 64 L.Ed.2d 794 (1980) with United States v. Thompson, 612 F.2d 233, 234 (6th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mary Dangerfield Bengivenga
(2×)
These are not technical; they are the factual and practical considerations of everyday life on which reasonable and prudent men, not legal technicians act.” Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 175 , 69 S.Ct. 1302, 1310 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 , 1890 (1949); see also United States v. Preston, 608 F.2d 626, 632 (5th Cir.1979) (quoting Brinegar), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2162 , 64 L.Ed.2d 794 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gotti
See United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182, 194 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979); see also United States v. Cambindo Valencia, 609 F.2d 603, 635-36, n. 25 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed.2d 795 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gilmore, Irvin W. v. Zimmerman, Leroy, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
See also United States v. Cambindo Valencia, 609 F.2d 603, 637 (2nd Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed.2d 795 (1980); United States v. Sanchez, 609 F.2d 761, 762 (5th Cir.1980); United States v. Bullock, 579 F.2d 1116, 1118 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 967 , 99 S.Ct. 456 , 58 L.Ed.2d 425 (1978); United States v. Vaughan, 715 F.2d 1373 , 1378 n. 2 (9th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hilda Escobar De Bright
We agree with the defendant. 4 “A defendant is entitled to an instruction concerning his theory of the case if it is supported by law and has some foundation in the evidence.” United States v. Winn, 577 F.2d 86, 90 (9th Cir.1978) (emphasis added); see United States v. Falsia, 724 F.2d 1339, 1342 (9th Cir.1983); United States v. Wright, 593 F.2d 105, 107 (9th Cir.1979); United States v. Hall, 552 F.2d 273, 275 (9th Cir.1977); see also United States v. Sielaff, 615 F.2d 402, 403 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed.2d 794 (1980) (“The general principle is w…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ross v. State
See also Young v. State, Del.Supr., 407 A.2d 517 (1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed.2d 794 (1980). 18 . 11 Del.C. § 401 then provided as follows: (a) In any prosecution for an offense, it is an affirmative defense that, at the time of the conduct charged, as a result of mental illness or mental defect, the accused lacked substantial capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of his conduct or lacked sufficient willpower to choose whether he would do the act or refrain from doing it. (b) If the defendant prevails in establishing the affirmative defense provided in subse…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Henry E. Herzbrun
See also e.g., United States v. Preston, 608 F.2d 626, 632 (5th Cir.1979) cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2162 , 64 L.Ed.2d 794 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Shipp
See United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087, 1107 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975); see also United States v. Cambindo Valencia, 609 F.2d 603, 625 (2d Cir.1979) (outlining circumstances in which charge must be given regarding multiple conspiracies), cer t. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed .2d 795 (1980). 67 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bothwell
See, e.g., United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979); United States v. Baller, 519 F.2d 463 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1019 , 96 S.Ct. 456 , 46 L.Ed.2d 391 (1975); see also United States v. Luschen, 614 F.2d 1164 , 1169 n. 3 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 939 , 100 S.Ct. 2161 , 64 L.Ed.2d 793 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John D. Hope
See also United States v. Luschen, 614 F.2d 1164 , 1169 & n. 3 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 939 , 100 S.Ct. 2161 , 64 L.Ed.2d 793 (1980) (refusing to reaffirm Frye).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Albert Perez
See, e.g., United States v. Cambindo Valencia, 609 F.2d 603, 631 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed.2d 795 (1980); United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182 , 194 n. 15 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979); United States v. Ziegler, supra, 583 F.2d at *37 80 n. 5.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kimball
Compare United States v. DiRe, 332 U.S. 581 , 68 S.Ct. 222 , 92 L.Ed. 210 (1948), and United States v. Barber, 557 F.2d 628, 630-32 (8th Cir.1977), with United States v. Luschen, 614 F.2d 1164, 1171 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 939 , 100 S.Ct. 2161 , 64 L.Ed.2d 793 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph M. Margiotta
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Cambindo-Valencia, 609 F.2d 603, 630 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed.2d 795 (1980); United States v. Geaney, 417 F.2d 1116, 1120 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1028 , 90 S.Ct. 1276 , 25 L.Ed.2d 539 (1970).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Beck
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 79-1579.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 12, 1980.
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.