green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.5 score
“this contention presents no federal question.”
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Dowell v. CM LENSING
this contention presents no federal question.
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Collazo
See Commonwealth v. Storey , 378 Mass. 312 , 323-324, 391 N.E.2d 898 (1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 955 , 100 S.Ct. 2924 , 64 L.Ed.2d 813 (1980) (rhetorical question highlighting general weakness of defense was not comment on defendant's failure to testify).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arlene Nordgren v. Jerome Hafter
Nordgren has stated a colorable equal protection claim, see Pappanastos v. Board of Trustees, Etc., 615 F.2d 219 (5th Cir.1980); compare Attwell v. Nichols, 608 F.2d 228, 231 (5th Cir.1979) (per curiam), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 955 , 100 S.Ct. 2924 , 64 L.Ed.2d 813 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dobson
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 79-6427.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 19, 1980.
Published
Citer courts: M.D. Louisiana (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.