green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
10.1 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 42 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Roldan Guillen-Linares, Sergio Delrio-Buentes, Tomas Gonzalez, Felix Valle, Raul Delrio-Boquet, and Raul Peralta
But see United States v. Warren, 578 F.2d 1058, 1067-70 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc), modified on other grounds, 612 F.2d 887 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied 446 U.S. 956 , 100 S.Ct. 2928 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 *81 (1980).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bruce Pickel and Lauren Pickel v. United States
ordinarily will not exclude witnesses without a demonstration of probable prejudice.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
The Governors Of The United States Postal Service v. The United States Postal Rate Commission
the agency entitled to deference in the interpretation of 39 u.s.c. 3622-24 is the rate commission not the postal service
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Miranda v. EMPRESAS DIAZ MASSO, INC.
“This so-called Golden Rule argument has been universally condemned ‘because it encourages the jury to depart from neutrality and to decide the case on the basis of personal interest and bias rather than on the evidence.’ ” Forrestal v. Magendantz, 848 F.2d 303, 309 (1st Cir.1988) (quoting Ivy v. Security Barge Lines, Inc., 585 F.2d 732, 741 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 956 , 100 S.Ct. 2927 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 *434 (1980)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Michael Wesley O'banion, Cross-Appellee
He relies on our decision in United States v. Warren, 612 F.2d 887 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 956 , 100 S.Ct. 2928 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980), in which we approved the validity of the opinions in Granda and Schnaiderman , holding that “the defendant [must] have actually known of the currency reporting requirement and have voluntarily and intentionally violated the known legal duty in order to be convicted of the crime.” Id. at 890 (emphasis added).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Jose Martin Barker
(4×)
The majority decided, however, that the case before it “is no longer a vehicle for consideration of the policies underlying the concurrent sentence doctrine.” Id. at 889.
discussed
Cited "see"
Anderson v. Texaco, Inc.
See Complaint of Merry Shipping, Inc., 650 F.2d 622, 626 (5 Cir.1981) (citing Ivy v. Security Barge Lines, Inc., 606 F.2d 524, 526 (5 Cir.1979) (en banc), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 956 , 100 S.Ct. 2927 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980)). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
Dennis v. State
See Starley v. City of Birmingham , 377 So.2d 1131 (Ala.Cr.App. 1979), writ denied, Ex parte Starley , 377 So.2d 1134 (Ala. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 956 , 100 S.Ct. 2929 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard I. Horowitz
See United States v. Torch, 609 F.2d 1088 (4th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 957 , 100 S.Ct. 2928 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Constance Haas Meester, Jeanne Sanfratello Tumulty, Robert Haas, Edward Conrad Sawyer
See United States v. Warren, 612 F.2d 887 (5th Cir.) (en banc) (defendant must have knowledge of reporting requirement and specific intent to commit crime), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 956 , 100 S.Ct. 2928 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980); United States v. Granda, 565 F.2d 922 (5th Cir.1978) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nadereh Abedi-Tajrishi v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
(2×)
See Narenji v. Civiletti, 617 F.2d 745, 747-48 (D.C.Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 446 U.S. 957 , 100 S.Ct. 2928 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Motion to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas
See U.S. v. Torch, 609 F.2d 1088, 1089-90 (4th Cir.1979) cert. denied 446 U.S. 957 , 100 S.Ct. 2928 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kathleen Dubose v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.
See Ivy v. Security Barge Lines, Inc., 606 F.2d 524 , 526 & n. 4 (5th Cir.1979) (en banc), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 956 , 100 S.Ct. 2927 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980); Cities Service Oil Co. v. Launey, 403 F.2d 537, 540 (5th Cir.1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Louis Michael Ober, Cross-Appellant v. Penrod Drilling Company, Cross-Appellee
See Allen v. Seacoast Products, Inc., 623 F.2d 355, 361 (5th Cir.1980), modified on other grounds, 606 F.2d 524 (5th Cir.1979) (en banc), cert, denied, 446 U.S. 956 , 100 S.Ct. 2927 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980); Jones Act U.S.C. § 688 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Hamid Shoaee v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See Narenji v. Civiletti, 617 F.2d 745, 747 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 957 , 100 S.Ct. 2928 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980); Shamsian v. Ilchert, 534 F.Supp. 178, 184-85 (N.D.Cal.1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Time, Inc. v. United States Postal Service
See United Parcel Service, Inc. v. USPS, 604 F.2d 1370, 1373-74 (3d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 957 , 100 S.Ct. 2929 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Time, Incorporated Newsweek, Inc. The Reuben H. Donnelley Corporation Mail Advertising Service Association International Direct Mail/marketing Association, Inc. Mail Order Association of America National Association of Greeting Card Publishers American Business Press, Inc. Associated Third Class Mail Users American Retail Federation Council of Public Utility Mailers United Parcel Service of America, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, Direct Mail/marketing Association, Inc. Dow Jones & Company the National Association of Greeting Card Publishers Association of American Publishers the Recording Industry Association of America, Inc. United Parcel Service of America, Inc. American Newspaper Publishers Association Advertisers Distribution Services Advertisers Postal Service Corp. Magazine Publishers Association Classroom Publishers Association March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation National Newspaper Association Mail Order Association of America Parcel Shippers Association Time, Incorporated Newsweek, Inc. Council of Public Utility Mailers American Retail Federation American Bankers Association, Intervenors. Direct Mail/marketing Association, Inc. And Associated Third Class Mail Users v. United States Postal Service
See United Parcel Service, Inc. v. USPS, 604 F.2d 1370, 1373-74 (3d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 957 , 100 S.Ct. 2929 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Henry Butera, Robert Andrew Denoma
See generally United States v. Warren, 612 F.2d 887, 891-96 (5th Cir.) (en banc) (Roney and Hill, JJ., concurring and dissenting), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 956 , 100 S.Ct. 2928 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alonso
See United States v. Warren, 578 F.2d 1058, 1064-65 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc) (no need for Coast Guard to have any particularized suspicion to stop a vessel for a document and safety check under 14 U.S.C.A. § 89 (a)), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 956 , 100 S.Ct. 2928 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Alliance to End Repression v. City of Chicago
See generally Narenji v. Civiletti, 617 F.2d 745 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 957 , 100 S.Ct. 2928 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980), and cases cited therein. 2 49.
discussed
Cited "see"
Alliance to End Repression v. City of Chicago
See generally Narenji v. Civiletti, 617 F.2d 745 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 957 , 100 S.Ct. 2928 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980), and cases cited therein. 6 In any event, the proposed settlements do not sanction CIA or FBI investigation of such persons.
discussed
Cited "see"
Merry Shipping, Inc. v. Merry Shipping Company, Inc.
See generally Gilmore & Black, The Law of Admiralty § 6-26 (1975). 7 Ivy v. Security Barge Lines, Inc., 606 F.2d 524 , 525 n.3 (5th Cir. 1979) (en banc), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 956 , 100 S.Ct. 2927 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980) 8 Ivy v. Security Barge Lines, Inc., supra, 606 F.2d at 526 -29 9 See In re Marine Sulphur Queen, 460 F.2d 89 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 982 , 93 S.Ct. 318 , 34 L.Ed.2d 246 (1972); Kwak Hyung Rok v. Continental Seafoods, Inc., 462 F.Supp. 894 (S.D.Ala.1978), affirmed without opinion, 614 F.2d 292 (5th Cir. 1980); Renner v. Rockwell International Corp., 403 F.Supp. 849…
discussed
Cited "see"
Governors of the United States Postal Service v. United States Postal Rate Commission
(2×)
See id. . 39 U.S.C. § 3603 (1976). .See United Parcel Service, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, 604 F.2d 1370, 1381 (3d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 957 , 100 S.Ct. 2929 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980) (“the agency entitled to deference in the interpretation of 39 U.S.C. §§ 3622-24 is the Rate Commission— not the Postal Service”); Nat'l Ass’n of Greeting Card Publishers v. United States Postal Service, 569 F.2d 570 , 595-596 & n.110 (D.C.
cited
Cited "see"
Picquet v. Amoco Production Co.
See Messer v. American Gems, Inc., 612 F.2d 1367 (4th Cir. 1980), cert. den. 446 U.S. 956 , 100 S.Ct. 2927 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Conchita Alicia Figueras Romero v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
V 1993); see also Narenji v. Civilett% 617 F.2d 745, 747 (D.C.Cir.1979) (upholding the authority of the Attorney General under the INA to impose reporting requirements on nonimmi-grant Iranian students because the regulation was “directly and reasonably related to the Attorney General’s duties and authority under the Act”), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 957 , 100 S.Ct. 2928 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Flores v. Meese
In Sam Andrews' Sons, we stated that the Attorney General's regulations promulgated under the INA "must be upheld if they are founded 'on considerations rationally related to the statute he is administering.' " 457 F.2d at 748 , quoting Fook Hong Mak v. INS, 435 F.2d 728, 730 (2d Cir.1970) (Fook Hong Mak ); see also Narenji v. Civiletti, 617 F.2d 745, 747 (D.C.Cir.1979) (Narenji ) (same), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 957 , 100 S.Ct. 2928 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Flores ex rel. Galvez-Maldonado v. Meese
In Sam Andrews’ Sons , we stated that the Attorney General’s regulations promulgated under the INA “must be upheld if they are founded ‘on considerations rationally related to the statute he is administering.’ ” 457 F.2d at 748 , quoting Hook Hong Mak v. INS, 435 F.2d 728, 730 (2d Cir.1970) (Fook Hong Mak); see also Narenji v. Civiletti, 617 F.2d 745, 747 (D.C.Cir.1979) (Narenji) (same), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 957 , 100 S.Ct. 2928 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Donahue, Joseph P.
See also United States v. Warren, 612 F.2d 887, 891 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 956 , 100 S.Ct. 2928 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980). 18 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Averi
See, e.g., United States v. Warren, 612 F.2d 887 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 956 , 100 S.Ct. 2928 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980). 4 Alternatively, Congress may have used the term “knowingly” in § 842(c)(2)(A) to mean only that the defendant must have been aware that he was not maintaining reasonably informative records on his usage of controlled substances.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Luis Enrique Gonzalez
(2×)
No. 2452, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. (1936); see also United States v. Warren, 578 F.2d 1058 , 1068- 70 (5th Cir.1978) (explaining the legislative response to Maul), rev’d in part on other grounds, 612 F.2d 887 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 956 , 100 S.Ct. 2928 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mary Dangerfield Bengivenga
See, e.g., United States v. Warren, 578 F.2d 1058, 1071 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 956 , 100 S.Ct. 2928 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Williams
See also Ivy v. Security Barge Lines, Inc., 585 F.2d 732 (5th Cir.1978), rev’d on other grounds, 606 F.2d 524 (5th Cir.1979) (en banc), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 956 , 100 S.Ct. 2927 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. One (1) Lot of Twenty-Four Thousand Nine Hundred Dollars ($24,900.00) in U.S. Currency, Robert Chemaly, Claimant-Defendant-Appellee
See also United States v. Warren, 612 F.2d 887 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 956 , 100 S.Ct. 2928 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980); United States v. Schnaiderman, 568 F.2d 1208 (5th Cir.1978). 7 It is clear that the terms of a statute cannot have one meaning when a criminal prosecution is brought and another when a civil action is brought.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Karen Sistrunk, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Michael Glenn Sistrunk v. Circle Bar Drilling Company, Sonya Sistrunk, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of David Brian Sistrunk v. Circle Bar Drilling Company, Betty Mae Rutland, Individually and as Independent and Representative of the Estate of Clifford Rutland v. Circle Bar Drilling Company
See also Ivy v. Security Barge Lines, Inc., 606 F.2d 524, 529 (5th Cir.1979) (en banc) (survivors cannot recover for loss of society under Jones Act), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 956 , 100 S.Ct. 2927 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sistrunk v. Circle Bar Drilling Co.
See also Ivy v. Security Barge Lines, Inc., 606 F.2d 524, 529 (5th Cir.1979) (en banc) (survivors cannot recover for loss of society under Jones Act), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 956 , 100 S.Ct. 2927 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lewis Palzer
See also United States v. Warren, 612 F.2d 887, 889-90 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert, denied, 446 U.S. 956 , 100 S.Ct. 2928 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mohammad Ali Ghaelian v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Compare Narenji v. Civiletti, 617 F.2d 745 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 957 , 100 S.Ct. 2928 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980) (regulation upheld on appeal from district court suit); Malek-Marzban v. INS, 653 F.2d 113 (4th Cir.1981) (regulation upheld without addressing jurisdiction); Dastmalchi v. INS, 660 F.2d 880 (3rd Cir.1981) (no jurisdiction to reach regulations because constitutionality cannot be raised in a deportation proceeding); Shoja v. INS, 679 F.2d 447 (5th Cir.1982) (failure of District Director to grant discretionary review is not within appellate jurisdiction); Sadegh-Nobari v…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Herman Ackerman
See also United States v. Warren, 578 F.2d 1058 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), modified in part, 612 F.2d 887 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 956 , 100 S.Ct. 2928 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980); United States v. Garcia, 496 F.2d 670 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied 420 U.S. 960 , 95 S.Ct. 1347 , 43 L.Ed.2d 436 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tidewater Marine Towing, Inc. v. Dow Chemical Co., Inc., Debra Ann Vicknair, Claimant-Appellant
See also Ivy v. Security Barge Lines, Inc., 585 F.2d 732 (5th Cir. 1978), modified on other grounds, 606 F.2d 524 (5th Cir. 1979) (en banc), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 956 , 100 S.Ct. 2927 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Martin Niver, Wayelon Howard Penland and Stanley Charles McCune
This action “does not impair any need of the government” and “avoids the possibility of adverse collateral consequences to the defendant.” United States v. Cardona, 650 F.2d 54, 58 (5th Cir. 1981) (citing United States v. Hooper, 432 F.2d 604, 606 (D.C.Cir.1970)); See also United States v. Warren, 612 F.2d 887, 891 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 956 , 100 S.Ct. 2928 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980) (en banc) (Roney and Hill, JJ., concurring and dissenting).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Attorney General of the United States of America v. The Irish People, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Narenji v. Civiletti, 617 F.2d 745, 748 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 957 , 100 S.Ct. 2928 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980) (requiring, in the context of classifications among aliens, only a “rational ba’sis” for such classifications since foreign policy considerations may be involved) (quoting Mathews v. Diaz, 426 U.S. 67, 81-82 , 96 S.Ct. 1883, 1892 , 48 L.Ed.2d 478 (1976) (“Any rule of constitutional law that would inhibit the flexibility of the political branches of government to respond to chang- ing world conditions should be adopted only with the greatest caution”) …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rolando Anderez
See also United States v. Warren, 612 F.2d 887, 889-90 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 956 , 100 S.Ct. 2928 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ivy
v.
Security Barge Lines, Inc.
v.
Security Barge Lines, Inc.
No. 79-1228.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 19, 1980.
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice White would grant certiorari.