green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
12.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1982 ·
…sinicropi is inconsistent with the supreme court's decision in alexander
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 36 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.
(2×)
sinicropi is inconsistent with the supreme court's decision in alexander
cited
Cited "see"
Toledo Fair Housing Center v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
See Pennsylvania Power & Light v. Gulf Oil Corp. (Pa.Super.1979), 270 Pa.Super. 514 , 411 A.2d 1203, 1213-1216 , certiorari denied (1980), 446 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 2943 , 64 L.Ed.2d 825 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Patton
See State v. Ferrell, 274 S.C. 401 , 266 S.E. (2d) 869 , cert. denied, 446 U.S. 965 , 100 S.Ct. 2942 , 64 L.Ed. (2d) 824 (1980) (search incident to arrent); State v. Brown, 289 S.C. 581 , 347 S.E. (2d) 882 (1986) (exigent circumstances & plain view); State v. Cox, 290 S.C. 489 , 351 S.E. (2d) 570 (1986) (automobile exception).
cited
Cited "see"
Roach v. Comptroller of the Treasury
See Bishop v. District of Columbia, 401 A.2d 955 (D.C.App.1979), affirmed in banc, 411 A.2d 997 (D.C.App.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 2943 , 64 L.Ed.2d 825 (1980). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony Ruiz Del Vizo
See United States v. Ashcroft, 607 F.2d 1167, 1171 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 2944 , 64 L.Ed.2d 826 (1980). 7 *827 In considering whether the investigating officers here had probable cause to believe that Del Vizo was participating or had participated in the commission of a crime, we are not swayed by the presence or absence of any particular observation alone.
discussed
Cited "see"
Torres v. WIS. DEPT. OF HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES
(2×)
See Gunther v. Iowa State Men's Reformatory, 612 F.2d 1079 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 966 [ 100 S.Ct. 2942 , 64 L.Ed.2d 825 ] (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Torres v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Social Services
(2×)
See Gunther v. Iowa State Men’s Reformatory, 612 F.2d 1079 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 966 [ 100 S.Ct. 2942 , 64 L.Ed.2d 825 ] (1980).
examined
Cited "see"
Stone v. Belgrade School District No. 44
(4×)
See Gunther v. Iowa State Men's Reformatory et al. (8th Cir.1980), 612 F.2d 1079 at 1086, cert. denied at 446 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 2942 , 64 L.Ed.2d 825 .
cited
Cited "see"
Stone v. Belgrade School District N
See Iowa A -- State Men's---------- - - __ Reformatory et -al. we(1980), 612 ~.2d &wLiT-iLuF- - - - C -_ _ - ^- - - 1079 a.t 1086, cert. denied at 446 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct,. 2942, 64 L.Ed.2d 825 .
discussed
Cited "see"
34 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1192, 34 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,341 Lynn T. Levin, and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
(2×)
Accord, Gunther v. Iowa State Men’s Reformatory, 612 F.2d 1079 , 1097 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 2942 , 64 L.Ed.2d 825 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Montgomery County, Md.
See Canron, Inc. v. Plasser American Corp., 474 F.Supp. 1010 (D.C.Va.1978), aff'd, 609 F.2d 1075 (4th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 965 , 100 S.Ct. 2942 , 64 L.Ed.2d 824 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Laurence J. Gordon, Inc. v. Brandt, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Cowley v. Braden Industries, Inc., 613 F.2d 751, 754 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 965 , 100 S.Ct. 2942 , 64 L.Ed.2d 824 (1981).
examined
Cited "see"
30 Fair empl.prac.cas. 624, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,176 Mary Delia Russaw Hardin v. Leroy N. Stynchcomb, 1 Etc.
(8×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Gunther v. Iowa Men’s Reformatory, 612 F.2d 1079 , 1086 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 2942 , 64 L.Ed.2d 825 (1980); Harden v. Dayton Human Rehabilitation Center, 520 F.Supp. 769, 780 (S.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Griffin v. Michigan Department of Corrections
(2×)
See Footnote 4 in Gunther v. Iowa State Men’s Reformatory, 462 F.Supp. 952, 956 (N.D.Iowa 1979), affirmed 612 F.2d 1079 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied 446 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 2942 , 64 L.Ed.2d 825 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Polk County Juvenile Home v. Iowa Civil Rights Commission
(2×)
See Gunther v. Iowa State Men’s Reformatory, 612 F.2d 1079 , 1085 (8th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 2942 , 64 L.Ed.2d (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnny Smith v. J. W. Fairman, Warden and Gayle Franzen, Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections
(2×)
See Gunther v. Iowa State Men’s Reformatory, 612 F.2d 1079 (8th Cir.), cert, denied, 446 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 2942 , 64 L.Ed.2d 825 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gordon v. Gordon
(2×)
See, Pennsylvania Power & Light Co. v. Gulf Oil Corp., 270 Pa.Super.Ct. 514 , 411 A.2d 1203 (1979), cert. denied 446 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 2943 ; Com. ex rel.
cited
Cited "see"
Convention Center Referendum Committee v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics
See Bishop v. District of Columbia, D.C.App., 411 A.2d 997, 999 (en banc), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 2943 , 64 L.Ed.2d 825 (1980); McIntosh, supra at 751-54 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Houshang Sheikh
See United States v. King, 517 F.2d 350, 354, n.2 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 2943 , 64 L.Ed.2d 825 (1980).
examined
Cited "see"
Sterling v. Cupp
(8×)
See Gunther v. Iowa State Men’s Reform., 612 F2d 1079 (8th Cir 1980) cert. den. 446 US 966 , 100 S Ct 2942 , 64 L Ed 2d 825 (1980).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Jordan v. Gardner
(4×)
The conflict between the right of one sex not to be discriminated against in job opportunities and the other to maintain some level of privacy "has normally been resolved by attempting to accommodate both interests through adjustments in scheduling and job responsibilities for the guards." Smith v. Fairman, 678 F.2d 52, 55 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 907 , 103 S.Ct. 1879 , 76 L.Ed.2d 810 (1983); see also Gunther v. Iowa State Men’s Reformatory, 612 F.2d 1079 , 1087 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 2942 , 64 L.Ed.2d 825 (1980), overruled on other grounds, Kremer v…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jordan v. Gardner
(2×)
The conflict between the right of one sex not to be discriminated against in job opportunities and the other to maintain some level of privacy "has normally been resolved by attempting to accommodate both interests through adjustments in scheduling and job responsibilities for the guards." Smith, 678 F.2d at 55 ; see also Gunther v. Iowa State Men's Reformatory, 612 F.2d 1079 , 1087 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 2942 , 64 L.Ed.2d 825 (1980), overruled on other grounds, Kremer v. Chemical Constr.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jordon v. Gardner
(2×)
The conflict between the right of one sex not to be discriminated against in job opportunities and the other to maintain some level of privacy “has normally been resolved by attempting to accommodate both interests through adjustments in scheduling and job responsibilities for the guards.” Smith, 678 F.2d at 55 ; see also Gunther v. Iowa State Men’s Reformatory, 612 F.2d 1079 , 1087 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 2942 , 64 L.Ed.2d 825 (1980), overruled on other grounds, Kremer v. Chemical Constr.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB Litigation
Although the standard of review is one of discretion, “if the trial court has not held the defendant to the proper burden or has clearly erred in weighing the factors to be considered, the equivalent of an abuse of discretion has been demonstrated.” Korn v. Marvin Fives Food Equipment, 362 Pa. Superior Ct. 559, 564 , 524 A.2d 1380, 1383 (1987); Moreover, “[a] change in venue is not granted lightly or without real necessity’ and the applicant bears the burden of proving that the change of venue is necessary.” Korn v. Marvin Fives Food Equipment, 362 Pa. Superior Ct. at 565 , 524 A.2d …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Csizmadia v. Fauver
(2×)
See, e.g., Gunther v. Iowa State Men’s Reformatory, 612 F.2d 1079 , 1086 (8th Cir,), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 2942 , 64 L.Ed.2d 825 (1980); Griffin, 654 F.Supp. 690, 703 (E.D.Mich.1982), Goodlander, 494 F.Supp. at 892-93 ; Avery, 473 F.Supp. at 91-92 . 12 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing Commission
(2×)
(Hardin v. Stynchcomb (11th Cir. 1982) 691 F.2d 1364, 1370-1371 ; see also Gunther v. Iowa State Men’s Reform (8th Cir. 1980) 612 F.2d 1079 , 1085-1086, cert. den. (1980) 446 U.S. 966 [ 64 L.Ed.2d 825 , 100 S.Ct. 2942 ].) In contrast, the BND is to be applied in connection with facially neutral practices that have a demonstrably disproportionate and adverse impact on members of a protected class.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chambers v. Omaha Girls Club
(2×)
Compare Hawkins v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., 697 F.2d 810, 815 (8th Cir.1983) (business necessity) with Gunther v. Iowa State Men's Reformatory, 612 F.2d 1079 , 1086 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 2942 , 64 L.Ed.2d 825 (1980) (bfoq). 19 Inasmuch as we already have affirmed the district court's finding of business necessity as not clearly erroneous, see supra at 703, we feel compelled to conclude that "[i]n the particular factual circumstances of this case," Dothard, 433 U.S. at 334 , 97 S.Ct. at 2729 , the role model rule is reasonably necessary to the Club's operations.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chambers v. Omaha Girls Club, Inc.
(2×)
Compare Hawkins v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., 697 F.2d 810, 815 (8th Cir.1983) (business necessity) with Gunther v. Iowa State Men’s Reformatory, 612 F.2d 1079 , 1086 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 2942 , 64 L.Ed.2d 825 (1980) (bfoq). 19 Inasmuch as we already have affirmed the district court’s finding of business necessity as not clearly erroneous, see supra at 703, we feel compelled to conclude that “[i]n the particular factual circumstances of this case,” Dothard, 433 U.S. at 334 , 97 S.Ct. at 2729 , the role model rule is reasonably necessary to the Club’s operatio…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lawrence H. Kent v. Perry Johnson and Dale Foltz
(2×)
See also Smith v. Chrans, 629 F.Supp. 606, 610-11 (C.D.Ill.1986). 35 Finally, in Gunther v. Iowa State Men's Reformatory, 612 F.2d 1079 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 2942 , 64 L.Ed.2d 825 (1980), the Eighth Circuit reviewed the prison administration's claim that a Title VII BFOQ eliminated women from the position of prison guard in the men's prison.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Ford
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v Brown, 602 F2d 909 (CA 9, 1979), cert den 446 US 966 (1980); State v Weiner, 126 Ariz 454; 616 P2d 914 (1980); State v Watts, 601 SW2d 617 (Mo, 1980); Klamath Falls v Winters, 289 Or 757 ; 619 P2d 217 (1980); Strickland v State, 276 SC 17; 274 SE2d 430 (1981); Mack v State, 93 Wis 2d 287 ; 286 NW2d 563 (1980); State v Karpinski, 92 Wis 2d 599 ; 285 NW2d 729 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bohemian Club v. Fair Employment & Housing Com.
(2×)
(Hardin v. Stynchcomb (11th Cir. 1982) 691 F.2d 1364, 1370-1371 ; see also Gunther v. Iowa State Men’s Reform. (8th Cir. 1980) 612 F.2d 1079 , 1086, cert. den. (1980) 446 U.S. 966 [ 64 L.Ed.2d 825 , 100 S.Ct. 2942 ], The Fair Employment and Housing Commission has interpreted the BFOQ defense in a manner incorporating all of the federal requirements necessary for its establishment.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Ray Glasser, Leonard Steven Gaza, Arthur Blair Erdlen, Daniel Lee Tomko. Appeal of Leonard Steven Gaza in No. 83-5909. United States of America v. Robert Ray Glasser, Leonard Steven Gaza, Arthur Blair Erdlen, Daniel Lee Tomko. Appeal of Arthur Blair Erdlen in No. 83-5929
Sec. 482 is a more specialized statutory provision designed to combat smuggled goods already introduced into the United States." Id. at 581 ; see also United States v. King, 517 F.2d 350, 353-54 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied sub nom., 446 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 2943 , 64 L.Ed.2d 825 (1980). 37 The broad statutory grant of authority in section 1582 is clearly sufficient to uphold the customs regulations permitting the search of packages without cause.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
O.S.C. Corp. v. Apple Computer, Inc.
(2×)
Sylvania; see also Cowley v. Braden Industries, Inc., 613 F.2d 751 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 965 , 100 S.Ct. 2942 , 64 L.Ed.2d 824 (1980); First Beverages, Inc. v. Royal Crown Cola Co., 612 F.2d 1164 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 3016 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1980); Clairol, Inc. v. Boston Discount Center, Inc., 608 F.2d 1114 (6th Cir.1979); Tripper Corp. v. Chrysler Corp., 484 F.Supp. 507 (N.D.Cal.1980). *1291 6.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Glasser
Thus, we agree with the conclusion that “the general border search statute is 19 U.S.C. § 1581 and that 19 U.S.C. § 482 is a more specialized statutory provision designed to combat smuggled goods already introduced into the United States.” Id. at 581 ; see also United States v. King, 517 F.2d 350, 353-54 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied sub nom., 446 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 2943 , 64 L.Ed.2d 825 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Calculators Hawaii, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Brandt, Inc. And Reynold M. Hallett, Cross-Appellees
See also Cowley v. Braden Industries, Inc., 613 F.2d 751, 754-55 (9th Cir.) (plaintiff must prove unreasonableness even when defendant has substantial market power), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 965 , 100 S.Ct. 2942 , 64 L.Ed.2d 824 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reynolds v. New York State Department of Correctional Services
(2×)
(CCH) ¶ 33,482, at 29,221 (E.D.Mich.1982) (“It is consistent with common sense, fairness and the state of the law to say that a blanket exclusion of women, in order to protect them from the rigors and difficulty of the prison system, is clearly unlawful under Title VIL); see also Gunther v. Iowa State Men’s Reformatory, 462 F.Supp. 952, 956-58 (N.D.Iowa 1979), aff’d, 612 F.2d 1079 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 2942 , 64 L.Ed.2d 825 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Iowa State Men's Reformatory
v.
Gunther
v.
Gunther
No. 79-1566.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 27, 1980.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court (2)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.