Ray v. Sowders, 446 U.S. 969 (1980). · Go Syfert
Ray v. Sowders, 446 U.S. 969 (1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
111 citation events across 25 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Roger Eagle Elk (ca8, 1981-09-15)
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Roger Eagle Elk
8th Cir. · 1981 · confidence medium
Ct. 2950, 64 L.Ed.2d 829 (1980); United States v. Thompson, 492 F.2d 359, 362 (8th Cir. 1974).
discussed Cited "see" In Re New York Asbestos Litigation (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. King, 616 F.2d 1034, 1041 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 969 , 100 S.Ct. 2950, 64 L.Ed.2d 829 (1980); Gordon v. United States, 438 F.2d 858, 876-77 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 828 , 92 S.Ct. 139 , 30 L.Ed.2d 56 (1971).
discussed Cited "see" Anderson v. Fiedler (2×)
E.D. Wis. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sullivan v. Ford, 609 F.2d 197, 198 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 969 , 100 S.Ct. 2950 , 64 L.Ed.2d 829 (1980); Hendrix v. Evans, 715 F.Supp. 897, 912 (N.D.Ind.1989); Lowery v. Cuyler, 521 F.Supp. 430 , 433 n. 9 (E.D.Pa.1981).
cited Cited "see" State v. Jones
Conn. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Payton, 615 F.2d 922, 924-25 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 969 , 100 S. Ct. 2950 , 64 L.
discussed Cited "see" Deputy v. State (2×)
Del. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Payton, 615 F.2d 922, 924-25 (1st Cir.) (valid waiver where defendant was given Miranda warnings and was informed of indictment), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 969 , 100 S.Ct. 2950 , 64 L.Ed.2d 830 (1980); United States v. Clements, 713 F.2d 1030, 1036 (4th Cir.1983) (waiver requires knowledge of indictment), vacated by an equally divided court, 728 F.2d 654 (4th Cir.1984) (en banc); Fields v. Wyrick, 706 F.2d 879, 881-82 (8th Cir.) (waiver where defendant was given Miranda warnings, had previously invoked right to counsel, and had opportunity to consult counsel during interrogat…
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Jack W. Karr
9th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Payton, 615 F.2d 922, 924-25 (1st Cir.) (valid waiver where defendant was given Miranda warnings and was informed of indictment), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 969 , 100 S.Ct. 2950 , 64 L.Ed.2d 830 (1980); United States v. Clements, 713 F.2d 1030, 1036 (4th Cir.1983) (waiver requires knowledge of indictment), vacated by an equally divided court, 728 F.2d 654 (4th Cir.1984) (en banc); Fields v. Wyrick, 706 F.2d 879, 881-82 (8th Cir.) (waiver where defendant was given Miranda warnings, had previously invoked right to counsel, and had opportunity to consult counsel during interrogat…
discussed Cited "see" Salahuddin v. Coughlin (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sullivan v. Ford, 609 F.2d 197 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 969 , 100 S.Ct. 2950 , 64 L.Ed.2d 829 (1980).
discussed Cited "see" Joseph George, Jr. v. Charles Black, Warden, Nebraska State Penitentiary (2×)
8th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. King, 616 F.2d 1034, 1042 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 969 , 100 S.Ct. 2950 , 64 L.Ed.2d 829 (1980); Kapp v. Naturelle, Inc., 611 F.2d 703, 709 (8th Cir.1979); American General Finance Corp. v. Parkway Bank, 520 F.2d 607, 608 (8th Cir.1975); United States ex rel.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. James William Reed (2×)
8th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. King, 616 F.2d 1034, 1040-41 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 969 , 100 S.Ct. 2950 , 64 L.Ed.2d 829 (1980).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Lemire (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. King, 616 F.2d 1034, 1041 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 969 , 100 S.Ct. 2950 , 64 L.Ed.2d 829 (1980); Gordon, 438 F.2d at 876-77 .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Joseph C. Lemire, United States of America v. Jon T. Stephens, United States of America v. Lionel W. Achuck, United States of America v. Interconex, Inc. (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. King, 616 F.2d 1034, 1041 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 969 , 100 S.Ct. 2950 , 64 L.Ed.2d 829 (1980); Gordon, 438 F.2d at 876-77 .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Michael O. Farber (2×)
8th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. King, 616 F.2d 1034, 1040-41 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 969 , 100 S.Ct. 2950 , 64 L.Ed.2d 829 (1980).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Dusablon
D. Me. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Payton, 615 F.2d 922, 924 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 969 , 100 S.Ct. 2950 , 64 L.Ed.2d 830 (1980).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Thomas C. Alley (2×)
8th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. King, 616 F.2d 1034, 1040 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 969 , 100 S.Ct. 2950 , 64 L.Ed.2d 829 (1980).
examined Cited "see" United States v. Norman John Norton (4×)
8th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. King, 616 F.2d 1034, 1040 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 969 , 100 S.Ct. 2950 , 64 L.Ed.2d 829 (1980).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Kenneth Aaron \Bud\" McCaghren United States of America v. Glen Edward Autry (2×)
unknown court · 1981 · signal: see also · confidence low
United States v. Bohr, 581 F.2d 1294, 1301 (8th Cir.) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 361 , 58 L.Ed.2d 351 (1978); see also United States v. King, 616 F.2d 1034, 1040-41 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 969 , 100 S.Ct. 2950 , 64 L.Ed.2d 829 (1980); United States v. Dawkins, 562 F.2d 567, 569 (8th Cir. 1977) (per curiam); United States v. Splain, 545 F.2d 1131, 1134-36 (8th Cir. 1976).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Spencer Segal (2×)
8th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see also · confidence low
“The facts of each case must be reviewed independently to ascertain whether the comment was ‘unduly prejudicial’ or was ‘plainly unwarranted and clearly injurious.’ Reversal is in order only if the court determines that the jury verdict could reasonably have been affected by the argument.” United States v. Splain, 545 F.2d 1131, 1135 (8th Cir. 1976) (citations omitted); see also United States v. King, 616 F.2d 1034, 1040 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 969 , 100 S.Ct. 2950 , 64 L.Ed.2d 829 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ray
v.
Sowders, Reformatory Superintendent
No. 79-6436.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 27, 1980.
446 U.S. 969
Published

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.