green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
10.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1993 ·
…proof that the defendant's activities had an impact uporreumpe- - - tition in the relevant market isaitabsolutely essentiál element of the rule of reason case
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2002 ·
…the damage to the goodwill and prominence of the (plaintiffs) trademark through public confusion of it with (defendant's) trademark is, in itself, an irreparable injury.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Keystone-Consolidated Industrial Inc. v. Mid-States Distributing Co.
(2×)
the damage to the goodwill and prominence of the (plaintiffs) trademark through public confusion of it with (defendant's) trademark is, in itself, an irreparable injury.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
New York Ex Rel. Abrams v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
(2×)
proof that the defendant's activities had an impact uporreumpe- - - tition in the relevant market isaitabsolutely essentiál element of the rule of reason case
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Griffin
In holding that the possibility of commutation, without the prospect of parole, did not save the defendant’s otherwise unconstitutional sentence, the Court stated that “[t]he possibility of commutation is nothing more than a hope for ‘an ad hoc exercise of clemency’.” 463 U.S. at 303 , 100 S.Ct. at 3016, 77 L.Ed.2d at 657 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Defense Distributed v. United States Department of State
(2×)
See Ideal Industries, Inc. v. Gardner Bender, Inc., 612 F.2d 1018, 1026 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 3016 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1980) (district court obligated to weigh relative hardship to parties in relation to decision to grant or deny preliminary injunction, even when, irreparable injury shown). 7 The district court concluded that thé preliminary injunction should be denied because Plaintiffs-Appellants failed to satisfy the balance of harm and public interest requirements, which do not concern the merits.
discussed
Cited "see"
Abbott Laboratories v. Mead Johnson & Company
(2×)
See Ideal Indus., Inc. v. Gardner-Bender, Inc., 612 F.2d 1018, 1026-27 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 3016 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1980); Ideassociates, Inc. v. Ideatech, Inc., 704 F.Supp. 294, 295-96 (D.D.C.1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cullman Ventures, Inc. v. Columbian Art Works, Inc.
(2×)
By its terms, the statutory defense only applies to terms “used fairly and in good faith.” 15 U.S.C. § 1115 (b)(4); see Ideal Indus., Inc. v. Gardner Bender, Inc., 612 F.2d 1018, 1027 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 3016 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Swanson & Setzke, Chtd. v. Henning
(2×)
See White v. Arlen Realty & Development Corp., 614 F.2d 387 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 923 , 100 S.Ct. 3016 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1980); Falcone v. Internal Revenue Service, 714 F.2d 646 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 908 , 104 S.Ct. 1689 , 80 L.Ed.2d 162 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gunther Graefenhain and Philip Miller, Cross-Appellees v. Pabst Brewing Company, Cross-Appellant
(2×)
See First Beverages, Inc. v. Royal Crown Cola Co., 612 F.2d 1164 , 1172 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 3016 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hybritech Incorporated v. Abbott Laboratories
(2×)
See Ideal Indus., Inc. v. Gardner Bender, Inc., 612 F.2d 1018, 1025 , 204 USPQ 177 , 184 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 3016 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1980). 43 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League
(2×)
See First Beverages, Inc. v. Royal Crown Cola Co., 612 F.2d 1164 , 1175 (9th Cir.) (separate counterclaim, and not mere reduction or cancellation of defendant’s liability, held to be appropriate so that both public wrongs might be vindicated), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 3016 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League, an Unincorporated Association, Baltimore Football Club, Inc. (Baltimore Colts), Buffalo Bills, Inc., Chargers Football Co. (San Diego Chargers), Chicago Bears Football Club, Inc., Cincinnati Bengals, Inc., Cleveland Browns, Inc., Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Inc., Detroit Lions, Inc., Five Smiths, Inc. (Atlanta Falcons), Green Bay Packers, Inc., Houston Oilers, Inc., Kansas City Chiefs Football Club, Inc., Los Angeles Rams Football Co., Miami Dolphins, Ltd., Minnesota Vikings Football Club, Inc., New England Patriots Football Club, Inc., New Orleans Saints Louisiana Partnership, New York Football Giants, New York Jets Football Club, Inc., Philadelphia Eagles Football Club, Inc., Pittsburgh Steelers Sports, Inc., Pro-Football, Inc. (Washington Redskins), Efk Sports, Ltd., Sued Herein as Rocky Mountain Empire Sports, Inc. (Denver Broncos), St. Louis Football Cardinals Co., San Francisco Forty-Niners, Seattle Professional Football (Seattle Seahawks), and Tampa Bay Area Nfl Football, Inc. (Tampa Bay Buccaneers), Oakland Raiders, Ltd., Cross Claimant-Appellee v. National Football League, an Unincorporated Association, Cross
(2×)
See First Beverages, Inc. v. Royal Crown Cola Co., 612 F.2d 1164 , 1175 (9th Cir.) (separate counterclaim, and not mere reduction or cancellation of defendant's liability, held to be appropriate so that both public wrongs might be vindicated), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 3016 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1980).
examined
Cited "see"
Aydin Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Loral Corporation, a New York Corporation, and Conic Corporation, a Delaware Corporation
(4×)
See First Beverages, Inc. v. Royal Crown Cola Co., 612 F.2d 1164 , 1175-76 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 3016 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1980); Sherman v. British Leyland Motors, Ltd., 601 F.2d at 451 ; Kaplan v. Burroughs Corp., 611 F.2d at 295-96 (affirming judgment non obstante veredicto); DeVoto v. Pacific Fidelity Life Insurance Co., 516 F.2d 1, 6-7 (9th Cir.) (reversing grant of summary judgment on section 1 claim), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 894 , 96 S.Ct. 194 , 46 L.Ed.2d 126 (1975); see also Continental T.V., Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc., 433 U.S. at 49 , 97 S.Ct. at 2557 (“Un…
discussed
Cited "see"
Wyle v. R.J. Reynolds Industries, Inc.
(2×)
See First Beverages, Inc. v. Royal Crown Cola Co., 612 F.2d 1164 , 1174-75 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 3016 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wyle v. R.J. Reynolds Industries, Inc.
(2×)
See First Beverages, Inc. v. Royal Crown Cola Co., 612 F.2d 1164 , 1174-75 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 3016 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1980). 30 PFEL bases its second point on the premise that, when a party has come forward with the information sought to be discovered, dismissal is an impermissibly harsh sanction.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lindy Pen Co., Inc. v. Bic Pen Corp.
(2×)
See Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. Hunting World, Inc., 537 F.2d 4,12 (2d Cir.1976); see generally Ideal Indus., Inc. v. Gardner Bender, Inc., 612 F.2d 1018, 1027 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 3016 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1980); 1 J.
discussed
Cited "see"
Southern Monorail Company v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.
(2×)
See Ideal Industries, Inc. v. Gardner Bender, Inc., 612 F.2d 1018, 1026 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 3016 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1980) (district court obligated to weigh relative hardship to parties in relation to decision to grant or deny preliminary injunction, even when irreparable injury shown).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rosebrough Monument Company v. Memorial Park Cemetery Association
(2×)
See generally Kaplan v. Burroughs Corp., 611 F.2d 286, 290-91 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 3016 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1980); Gough v. Rossmoor Corp., 585 F.2d 381, 389 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 1280 , 59 L.Ed.2d 494 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rosebrough Monument Co. v. Memorial Park Cemetery Ass'n
(2×)
See generally Kaplan v. Burroughs Corp., 611 F.2d 286, 290-91 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 3016 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1980); Gough v. Rossmoor Corp., 585 F.2d 381, 389 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 1280 , 59 L.Ed.2d 494 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Trw, Inc., and Horace A. Shepard v. The Federal Trade Commission
(2×)
See Kaplan v. Burroughs Corp., 611 F.2d 286, 291-92 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 3016 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1980).
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Lawn King, Inc.
(4×)
The general thrust of the subsequent decisions interpreting Sylvania is that the Supreme Court’s ruling in that case “evinces judicial reluctance to extend per se rules under [the Sherman Act].” Magnus Petroleum Co. v. Skelly Oil Co., 599 F.2d 196, 204 (7 Cir. 1979), cert. den. 444 U.S. 916 , 100 S.Ct. 231 , 62 L.Ed.2d 171 (1979); see First Beverages, Inc. v. Royal Crown Cola Co., 612 F.2d 1164 , 1170 (9 Cir. 1980), cert. den. 447 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 3016 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1980); Cowley v. Braden Industries, Inc., 613 F.2d 751, 754-755 (9 Cir. 1980), cert. den. 446 U.S. 965 , 100 S.Ct.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Aimster Copyright Litigation
(2×)
See, e.g., Ideal Industries, Inc. v. Gardner Bender, Inc., 612 F.2d 1018, 1025 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 3016 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
RWT CORP. v. Wonderware Corp.
(2×)
See, e.g., Ideal Industries, Inc. v. Gardner Bender, Inc., 612 F.2d 1018, 1026 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 3016 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Coherent, Inc. v. Coherent Technologies, Inc.
(2×)
See also Ideal Indus., Inc. v. Gardner Bender, Inc., 612 F.2d 1018, 1027 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 3016 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1980); 1 J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Football League v. National Football League
(2×)
In fact, Perma Life explicitly states that such evidence “can of course be taken into consideration in computing damages.” 392 U.S. at 140 , 88 S.Ct. at 1985 ; see also First Beverages, Inc. v. Royal Crown Cola Co., 612 F.2d 1164 , 1175 (9th Cir.) (plaintiff's anticompetitive conduct could be introduced “to disprove part or all of the claimed damages”), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 3016 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1980); Pearl Brewing Co. v. Jos.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Football League v. National Football League
(2×)
In fact, Perma Life explicitly states that such evidence "can of course be taken into consideration in computing damages." 392 U.S. at 140 , 88 S.Ct. at 1985 ; see also First Beverages, Inc. v. Royal Crown Cola Co., 612 F.2d 1164 , 1175 (9th Cir.) (plaintiff's anticompetitive conduct could be introduced "to disprove part or all of the claimed damages"), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 3016 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1980); Pearl Brewing Co. v. Jos.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pennsylvania Ex Rel. Zimmerman v. PepsiCo, Inc.
(2×)
See also First Beverages, Inc. v. Royal Crown Cola Co., 612 F.2d 1164 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 924, 100 S.Ct. 3016 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rexnord, Inc. v. Laitram Corp.
(2×)
Delay of this nature undercuts the sense of urgen *474 cy that ordinarily accompanies a motion for preliminary relief and suggests that there is, in fact, no irreparable injury.’ 731 F.2d at 678 quoting Le Sportsac, Inc. v. Dockside Research, Inc., 478 F.Supp. 602, 609 (S.D.N.Y.1979); see also Ideal Industries v. Gardner Bender, Inc., 612 F.2d 1018, 1025 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 3016 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1980) (delay is a factor to be considered in assessing irreparable injury).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Data General Corp. Antitrust Litigation
(2×)
See, e.g., Kaplan v. Burroughs Corp., 611 F.2d 286, 293-95 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 3016 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1980); General Business Systems v. North American Phillips Corp., 1980 Trade Cases ¶ 63,607 (N.D.Cal.1980); Reisner v. General Motors Corp., 511 F.Supp. 1167 (S.D.N.Y. 1981); ILC Peripherals v. IBM Corp., 458 F.Supp. 423, 427 (N.D.Cal.1978), aff'd 636 F.2d 1188 (9th Cir. 1980); Telex Corp. v. IBM Corp., 510 F.2d 894 , 917 (10th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 802 , 96 S.Ct. 8 , 46 L.Ed.2d 244 (1975). 29 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Zeccola
v.
Ezzo
v.
Ezzo
No. 79-1682.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 16, 1980.
Published
Citer courts: C.D. Illinois (2) · E.D. New York (2)
Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.