green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.6 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1996 ·
…henceforth, the district courts, in any denial of a double jeopardy motion, should make written findings determining whether the motion is frivolous or nonfrivolous ...
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Death Row Prisoners v. Ridge
(2×)
henceforth, the district courts, in any denial of a double jeopardy motion, should make written findings determining whether the motion is frivolous or nonfrivolous ...
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Robert Stewart v. Donald Donges
henceforth, the district courts, in any denial of a double jeopardy motion, should make written findings determining whether the motion is frivolous or nonfrivolous. ... if nonfrivolous, of course, the trial cannot proceed until a determination is made of the merits of an appeal.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Kalil
(2×)
See State v. Baldwin, supra, 355 (fact that other misconduct evi- dence ‘‘was remarkably similar both in kind and loca- tion’’ to evidence of charged crime made other mis- conduct evidence ‘‘that much more probative’’), citing United States v. Jones, 913 F.2d 1552, 1566 (11th Cir. 1990), and United States v. Dunbar, 614 F.2d 39, 42 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S. Ct. 3022 , 65 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Walter Esposito
(2×)
See United States v. Dunbar, 591 F.2d 1190, 1192 (5th Cir.1979) (“no court in this country has ever held that a defendant may not be indicted and tried once for a conspiracy and thereafter tried for the crime of distributing controlled substances”), panel opinion adopted in relevant part, 611 F.2d 985 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 (1980).
examined
Cited "see"
Trimboli v. MacLean
(4×)
See United States v. Dunbar, 611 F.2d 985, 989 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 (1980); and see Com. v. Brady, 508 A.2d 286, 291 (Pa.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lewis, on Behalf of Nat. Semiconductor v. Sporck
(2×)
See generally United States v. Farris, 614 F.2d 634, 639 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 (1980); see also Beecroft, 608 F.2d at 759 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lester Rogers, United States of America v. Lester Rogers
(2×)
See United States v. Dunbar, 611 F.2d 985, 988 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Trade Commission v. Kitco of Nevada, Inc.
(2×)
See United States v. Baumann, 614 F.2d 634 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 (1980); FTC v. International Diamond Corp., 1983-82 Trade Cas.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Black
(2×)
See United States v. Dunbar, 611 F.2d 985, 987 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Melvin Dick and Anthony Giacomino
(2×)
See United States v. Farris, 614 F.2d 634, 638 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 (1980); United States v. Frick, 588 F.2d 531, 536 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 2013 , 60 L.Ed.2d 385 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony T. Mulherin, Jr., Harvey E. Hornsby, Robert A. Holliday, Henry Mulherin, Elizabeth Moore
(2×)
See U.S. v. Dunbar, 611 F.2d 985 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 (1980). a.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wright v. Schock
(2×)
See United States v. Farris, 614 F.2d 634 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 (1980); Los Angeles Trust Deed & Mortgage Exchange v. SEC, 285 F.2d 162 (9th Cir.1960); Lingenfelter v. Title Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Boyer
(2×)
See United States v. Farris, 614 F.2d 634 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 (1980); United States v. Themy, 624 F.2d 963, 965 (10th Cir.1980); United States v. Henderson, 446 F.2d 960, 966 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 991 , 92 S.Ct. 536 , 30 L.Ed.2d 543 (1971); United States v. Frick, 588 F.2d 531, 536 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 2013 , 60 L.Ed.2d 385 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carla Florentine Hines, Leroy Dale Hines, Anna Mae Hines, Defendants
(2×)
See United States v. Dunbar, 611 F.2d 985, 987-88 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ray L. Corona and Rafael L. Corona
(2×)
See also United States v. Dunbar, 611 F.2d 985 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 (1980); United States v. Cerilli, 558 F.2d 697 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 966 , 98 S.Ct. 507 , 54 L.Ed.2d 452 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Billy Joe Nichols
(2×)
See also, United States v. Dunbar, 591 F.2d 1190 (5th Cir. 1979), panel opinion adopted in relevant part and remanded, 611 F.2d 985 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert, denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 (1980).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Schock
(4×)
We find that the economic welfare of the purchasers is inextricably woven with the ability of LATD to locate by the exercise of its independent judgment a sufficient number of discounted trust deeds, and the ability of LATD to subsequently meet its commitments, to check, evaluate, supervise, and supersede.” (Id., 285 F.2d at p. 172; see also Securities and Exchange Com’n v. Lake Havasu Estates (D.Minn. 1972) 340 F.Supp. 1318, 1321-1322 [defendant’s screening and protection of investments in land sales contracts determined as securities].) Similarly, in United States v. Farris (9th Cir. 1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Woodrow Vernell Clemons, A/K/A \Sundown\""
(2×)
U.S. v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979); U.S. v. Jimenez, 613 F.2d 1373, 1376 (5th Cir. 1980); see also U.S. v. Dunbar, 614 F.2d 39, 42 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 (1980); U.S. v. Kloock, III, 652 F.2d 492 , (5th Cir. 1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John C. Gryar v. Odeco Drilling, Inc. v. Otto Candies, Inc., and Highlands Insurance Company, Third Party
(2×)
See id. at 694 ; see also United States v. Dunbar, 611 F.2d 985 (5th Cir.) (en banc) (despite appeal from denial of double jeopardy motion, the district court is not divested of jurisdiction when the trial judge finds that the motion is “frivolous”), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Antonelli
v.
Tribune Newspaper
v.
Tribune Newspaper
No. 79-6374.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 16, 1980.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: E.D. Pennsylvania (2) · Tenth Circuit (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.