green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.9 score
“time, effort and expectations”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Bob A. Clapps, United States of America v. Robert T. Powell
time, effort and expectations
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Eugene Boffa, Sr., Robert Boffa, Sr., Louis S. Kalmar, Sr., and Chandler Lemon
time, effort and expectations
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re American Continental Corporation/Lincoln Savings & Loan Securities Litigation
(2×)
“The scheme must be reasonably calculated to deceive persons of ordinary prudence and comprehension.” Id. at 1172.
cited
Cited "see"
California Architectural Building Products, Inc. v. Franciscan Ceramics, Inc.
Schreiber, 806 F.2d at 1399-400 ; see United States v. Bohonus, 628 F.2d 1167 , 1171 & n. 7 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 928 , 100 S.Ct. 3026 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1122 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
California Architectural Building Products, Inc. v. Franciscan Ceramics, Inc.
Schreiber, 806 F.2d at 1399-400 ; see United States v. Bohonus, 628 F.2d 1167 , 1171 & n. 7 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 928 , 100 S.Ct. 3026 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1122 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wayne Martin
See U.S. v. Bohonus, 628 F.2d 1167 (9th Cir.) (a specific intent requirement eliminates the objection that the statute punishes the accused for an offense of which he was unaware), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 928 , 100 S.Ct. 3026 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1122 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Virden v. Graphics One
The statutes share identical language in providing that those who act “having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or' fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises ... shall be fined or imprisoned....” 18 U.S.C. § 1341 ; id. § 1343; see United States v. Bohonus, 628 F.2d 1167 , 1171 n. 7 (9th Cir.) (noting that “sections 1341 and 1343 ‘share identical language’ in proscribing the formation of schemes to defraud”) (quoting United States v. Louderman, 576 F.2d 1383 , 1387 n. 3 (9th Cir.1978)), c…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. F. Thomas Little, United States of America v. Peter Chernik, United States of America v. Harold Grutchfield
Accord United States v. Bohonus, 628 F.2d 1167, 1173-74 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 928 , 100 S.Ct. 3026 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1122 (1980); United States v. Broncheau, 597 F.2d 1260, 1263 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 859 , 100 S.Ct. 123 , 62 L.Ed.2d 80 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David A. Feldman
See United States v. Bohonus, 628 F.2d 1167, 1172 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 928 , 100 S.Ct. 3026 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1122 (1980); United States v. Bryza, 522 F.2d 414, 422 (7th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 2237 , 48 L.Ed.2d 837 (1976); United States v. George, 477 F.2d 508, 513 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 827 , 94 S.Ct. 158 , 38 L.Ed.2d 61 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thompson v. Community Action of Greater Wilmington, Inc.
See Griffith v. Beil-Whitley Community Action Agency, 614 F.2d 1102, 1109 (6th Cir.) (no nexus because discretion to terminate employees left to agency), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 928 , 100 S.Ct. 3025 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1122 (1980); Joseph v. Community Action Comm’n to Help the Economy, Inc., 503 F.Supp. 73 , 75 & n. 6 (S.D.N.Y.1980) (even though public board members involved, no nexus between state and personnel decisions); Joseph v. Ulster County Community Action Comm’n, 475 F.Supp. 944, 948 (S.D.N.Y.1979) (state not involved in personnel decisions). 13 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Newsom v. Vanderbilt University
See Jackson v. Norton-Children's Hospitals, Inc., 487 F.2d 502, 503 (6th Cir. 1973) (per curiam), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 1000 , 94 S.Ct. 2413 , 40 L.Ed.2d 776 (1974). 66 This Court rejected an analogous claim of state action in Griffith v. Bell-Whitley Community Action Agency, 614 F.2d 1102, 1108-10 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 928 , 100 S.Ct. 3025 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1122 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Sullivan
See also, United States v. Bohonus, 628 F.2d 1167, 1173-75 (9th Cir.) (rejecting vagueness challenge to mail fraud statute), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 928 , 100 S.Ct. 3026 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1122 (1980). “[16] To state the governing law on this issue is to reject the defendant’s vagueness attack on section 843(b).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bryser
See, e.g., United States v. Bohonus, 628 F.2d 1167, 1171-72 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 447 U.S. 928 , 100 S.Ct. 3026 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1122 (1980); United States v. Armantrout, 411 F.2d 60 (2d Cir.1969). 1 This construction accords with the, plain meaning of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 1343, which prohibits use of the mails or interstate wire facilities to further “any scheme or artifice to defraud or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises ...” (emphasis added).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Werner Bruchhausen
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Bohonus, 628 F.2d 1167, 1170-73 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 928 , 100 S.Ct. 3026 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1122 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cleveland R. Rodgers
See also United States v. Bohonus, 628 F.2d 1167, 1173-75 (9th Cir.) (rejecting vagueness challenge to mail fraud statute), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 928 , 100 S.Ct. 3026 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1122 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bennett L. Crowder, II v. J.K. Conlan
Edison Co., 419 U.S. at 350 , 95 S.Ct. at 453 ; see also Griffith v. Bell-Whitley Community Action Agency, 614 F.2d 1102, 1109 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 928 , 100 S.Ct. 3025 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1122 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Enrique Cervantes v. Ramiro Guerra
See also Griffith v. Bell-Whitley Community Action Agency, 6th Cir., 614 F.2d 1102, 1107-10 , cert. denied, 1980, 447 U.S. 928 , 100 S.Ct. 3025 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1122 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Snell
v.
National Railroad Passenger Corp.
v.
National Railroad Passenger Corp.
No. 79-6509.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 16, 1980.
Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (2)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.