green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.7 score
“zoning provides one of the firmest and most basic of the rights of local control”
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Dumas v. City of Dallas
zoning provides one of the firmest and most basic of the rights of local control
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Baker
See State v. Berry, 692 S.W.2d 553, 561 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 887 , 101 S.Ct. 241 , 66 L.Ed.2d 112 (1980) (holding that statements made to a jail informant, although voluntary, were inadmissible as a violation of defendant’s sixth amendment right, in part, because defendant’s attorney had specifically instructed officers not to question his client outside his presence).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sabetti v. DiPaolo
See Stansberry v. Holmes, 613 F.2d 1285, 1289 (5th Cir.) (“A provision need not ... be cast in terms that are mathematically precise....”) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 886 , 101 S.Ct. 240 , 66 L.Ed.2d 112 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Crawford County
“The regulation of land use is traditionally a function performed by local governments.” Lake Country, 440 U.S. at 402 , 99 S.Ct. at 1177 ; see Grant v. County of Seminole, 817 F.2d 731, 736 (11th Cir.1987) (per curiam) (“ ‘Zoning provides one of the firmest and most basic of the rights of local control.’ ” (quoting Stansberry v. Holmes, 613 F.2d 1285, 1288 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 886 , 101 S.Ct. 240 , 66 L.Ed.2d 112 (1980))).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Crawford County
Crymes, 923 F.2d at 1485 . 31 "The regulation of land use is traditionally a function performed by local governments." Lake Country, 440 U.S. at 402 , 99 S.Ct. at 1177 ; see Grant v. County of Seminole, 817 F.2d 731, 736 (11th Cir.1987) (per curiam) (" 'Zoning provides one of the firmest and most basic of the rights of local control.' " (quoting Stansberry v. Holmes, 613 F.2d 1285, 1288 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 886 , 101 S.Ct. 240 , 66 L.Ed.2d 112 (1980))).
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Copeland
See Stansberry v. Holmes, 613 F.2d 1285 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 886 , 101 S.Ct. 240 , 66 L.Ed.2d 112 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Novotny v. Great American Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
See Rosser v. Laborers’ Int’l Union, 616 F.2d 221 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied 449 U.S. 886 , 101 S.Ct. 241 , 66 L.Ed.2d 112 ; Pettway v. American Cast Iron Pipe Co., 411 F.2d 998 (5th Cir. 1969).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Ortiz
Accord State v. Berry, 592 S.W.2d 553 (Tenn.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 887 , 101 S.Ct. 241 , 66 L.Ed.2d 112 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bracken v. Welborn
See also Rosser v. Laborers' International Union, Local 438, 616 F.2d 221, 223 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 886 , 101 S.Ct. 241 , 66 L.Ed.2d 112 (1980) (“There may arise instances where the employee's conduct in protest of an unlawful employment practice so interferes with the performance of his job that it renders him ineffective in the position for which he was employed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Burns v. Blackhawk Management Corp.
See also Rosser v. Laborers’ International Union, Local 438, 616 F.2d 221, 223 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 886 , 101 S.Ct. 241 , 66 L.Ed.2d 112 (1980) (“There may arise instances where the employee’s conduct in protest of an unlawful employment practice so interferes with the performance of his job that it renders him ineffective in the position for which he was employed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mayo v. State
See, e.g., Stansberry v. Holmes, 613 F.2d 1285, 1290 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 886 , 101 S.Ct. 240 , 66 L.Ed.2d 112 (1980); State v. Garcia, 823 S.W.2d 793, 798-99 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1992, pet. ref'd); Schope v. State, 647 S.W.2d 675, 678-79 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1982, pet. ref'd); Memet v. State, 642 S.W.2d 518, 523 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1982, pet. ref'd).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jolar Cinema of Houston, Inc. v. City of Houston
See, e.g., Stansberry v. Holmes, 613 F.2d 1285 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 886 , 101 S.Ct. 240 , 66 L.Ed.2d 112 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Crown Zellerbach Corp.
See, e.g., Rosser v. Laborers’ Int’l Union of North Am., 616 F.2d 221, 223-24 (5th Cir.) (employee’s hostility to supervisor rendered her ineffective in performance of duties), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 886 , 101 S.Ct. 241 , 66 L.Ed.2d 112 (1980); Jefferies v. Harris Co. Comm. Action Assoc., 615 F.2d 1025, 1036 (5th Cir.1980) (employee’s surreptitious copying of confidential documents interfered with employer’s interest in maintaining confidentiality of employee records); Pendleton v. Rumsfeld, 628 F.2d 102, 107-08 (D.C.Cir.1980) (participation in disruptive, noisy demonstration during …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rosser
v.
Laborers' International Union of North America, Local No. 438
v.
Laborers' International Union of North America, Local No. 438
No. 80-5118.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1980.
C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
Justice Brennan would grant certiorari.