green
Positive treatment
2.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lyles-Gray
See State v. Love, 275 S.C. 55, 61 , 271 S.E.2d 110, 113 (1980) (former magistrate’s procurement of invalid driver’s license for an individual and promise to fix traffic records and “fix the prosecution” against the individual for $5,500 was sufficient evidence to establish common-law obstruction of justice), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 901 , 101 S.Ct. 272 , 66 L.Ed.2d 131 (1980); Cogdell, 273 S.C. at 567 , 257 S.E.2d at 750 (holding that the “intentional failure of a responsible public official to report convictions of traffic violations so as to interrupt or prevent the mandated suspens…
discussed
Cited "see"
Isquith v. Middle South Utilities, Inc.
See SEC v. Mize, 615 F.2d 1046, 1051-55 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 901 , 101 S.Ct. 271 , 66 L.Ed.2d 131 (1980) 15 In taking the position that a company's failure to disclose predictions is not actionable, the district court said it was afraid that negative predictions could become "self-fulfilling prophec[ies]." We are not convinced that such a fear is enough, by itself, to justify the nondisclosure, under all circumstances, of all predictions which portray companies in a negative light.
cited
Cited "see"
Isquith ex rel. Isquith v. Middle South Utilities, Inc.
See SEC v. Mize, 615 F.2d 1046, 1051-55 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 901 , 101 S.Ct. 271 , 66 L.Ed.2d 131 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Etalook v. Exxon Pipeline Company
See also Armstrong v. Maple Leaf Apartments, Ltd., 436 F.Supp. 1125, 1147-50 (D.Okla.1977) aff'd in part, 622 F.2d 466 (10th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 901 , 101 S.Ct. 271 , 66 L.Ed.2d 131 (1980) (rejecting the argument that laches is not available to defendants in actions brought by Indians with respect to their restricted lands in a case where the plaintiff sold her land, raised no objections when the defendant developed the land, and then brought an action for quiet title). 27 In summary, we reject Etalook's argument that she is entitled to damages reflecting the values of the improv…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Etalook v. Exxon Pipeline Co.
See also Armstrong v. Maple Leaf Apartments, Ltd., 436 F.Supp. 1125, 1147-50 (D.Okla.1977) aff'd in part, 622 F.2d 466 (10th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 901 , 101 S.Ct. 271 , 66 L.Ed.2d 131 (1980) (rejecting the argument that laches is not available to defendants in actions brought by Indians with respect to their restricted lands in a case where the plaintiff sold her land, raised no objections when the defendant developed the land, and then brought an action for quiet title).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kaufman
v.
New Jersey
v.
New Jersey
No. 80-216.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1980.
Published
Super. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.