green
Positive treatment
6.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 36 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Letetia Jefferson v. Lead Industries Association, Inc.
See Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories, 26 Cal.3d 588 , 163 Cal.Rptr. 132 , 607 P.2d 924 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 285 , 66 L.Ed.2d 140 (1980) 5 Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Corp. v. Transportation Ins.
cited
Cited "see"
Jefferson v. Lead Industries Ass'n
See Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories, 26 Cal.3d 588 , 163 Cal.Rptr. 132 , 607 P.2d 924 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 285 , 66 L.Ed.2d 140 (1980). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Russo v. Material Handling Specialties Co.
Because “consumers may be harmed by a product not traceable to a specific producer,” various federal and state courts around the country reason that the “traditional tests of liabiliiy are insufficient to govern the obligations of manufacturer to consumer in such situations, and some adaptation of the rules of causation and liability seems appropriate.” id.; see Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories, 607 P.2d 924, 936 (Cal.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Claytor v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
See Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories, 26 Cal.3d 588, 610-611 , 163 Cal.Rptr. 132, 144 , 607 P.2d 924, 936 (adopting market share liability in DES case), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 285 , 286, 66 L.Ed.2d 140 (1980); Hymowitz v. Eli Lilly & Co., 73 N.Y.2d 487 . 511-512, 541 N.Y.S.2d 941, 950 , 539 N.E.2d 1069, 1078 (adopting a variation of market share liability in DES case), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 944 , 110 S.Ct. 350 , 107 L.Ed.2d 337 (1989); Martin v. Abbott Laboratories, 102 Wash.2d 581, 602-05 , 689 P.2d 368, 381-382 (1984) (same); Collins v. Eli Lilly & Co., 116 Wis.2d 166, 190-91 …
discussed
Cited "see"
Wood v. Eli Lilly & Co.
See Sindell v. Abbott Lab., 26 Cal.3d 588 , 163 Cal.Rptr. 132 , 607 P.2d 924, 937 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 286 , 66 L.Ed.2d 140 (1980); Martin v. Abbott Lab., 102 Wash.2d 581 , 689 P.2d 368, 380 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wood v. Eli Lilly & Co.
See Sindell v. Abbott Lab., 26 Cal.3d 588 , 163 Cal.Rptr. 132 , 607 P.2d 924, 937 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 286 , 66 L.Ed.2d 140 (1980); Martin v. Abbott Lab., 102 Wash.2d 581 , 689 P.2d 368, 380 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Des Litigation. Deborah Ashley and Andrew Ashley v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals
See Sindell v. Abbot Laboratories, 26 Cal.3d 588 , 163 Cal.Rptr. 132 , 607 P.2d 924 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 285 , 66 L.Ed.2d 140 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
City of Philadelphia v. Lead Industries Ass'n
See Sindell v. Abbott Lab., 26 Cal.3d 588 , 163 Cal.Rptr. 132 , 607 P.2d 924 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 285 , 66 L.Ed.2d 140 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
City Of Philadelphia v. Lead Industries Association, Inc.
See Sindell v. Abbott Lab., 26 Cal.3d 588 , 163 Cal.Rptr. 132 , 607 P.2d 924 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 285 , 66 L.Ed.2d 140 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Ashley v. Abbott Laboratories
See Sindell v. Abbott Labs., 26 Cal.3d 588 , 163 Cal.Rptr. 132 , 607 P.2d 924, 937 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 285 , 66 L.Ed.2d 140 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re DES Cases
See Sindell v. Abbott Labs., 26 Cal.3d 588 , 163 Cal.Rptr. 132 , 607 P.2d 924, 937 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 285 , 66 L.Ed.2d 140 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Chelton v. Keystone Oilfield Supply Co., Inc.
See, Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories, 26 Cal.3d 588 , 163 Cal.Rptr. 132 , 607 P.2d 924 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 285 , 66 L.Ed.2d 140 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bailiff v. Manville Forest Products Corp.
See Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories, 26 Cal.3d 588 , 607 P.2d 924 , 163 Cal.Rptr. 132 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 285 , 66 L.Ed.2d 140 (1980); Robertson v. Allied Signal, Inc., 914 F.2d 360 (3d Cir.1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Sholtis v. American Cyanamid Co.
Shackil at 166-168, 561 A. 2d 511; see Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories, 26 Cal. 3d 588 , 163 Cal. Rptr. 132 , 607 P. 2d 924 , cert. den. 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 285 , 66 L.Ed. 2d 140 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
BIXLER BY BIXLER v. Avondale Mills
See Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories, 26 Cal.3d 588 , 607 P.2d 924 , 163 Cal.Rptr. 132 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 286 , 66 L.E.2d 140 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mason v. Spiegel, Inc.
See Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories, 26 Cal.3d 588 , 163 Cal.Rptr. 132, 145 , 607 P.2d 924, 937 (1978), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 285 , 66 L.Ed.2d 140 (1980) (One of original DES defendant manufacturers was dismissed upon its filing a declaration that it had not manufactured DES until after plaintiff was born.) In such circumstances, it would be unreasonable to impose burdens on the third-party defendants when harm might have been caused by only one of them.
cited
Cited "see"
Southern Pacific Communications Co. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co.
See Mid-Texas Communications Systems v. AT & T, 615 F.2d 1372, 1389 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 286 , 66 L.Ed.2d 140 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Related Asbestos Cases
See Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories, et. al., 26 Cal.3d 588, 604 , 163 Cal.Rptr. 132 , 607 P.2d 924 (1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 285 , 66 L.Ed.2d 140 (1980); Prosser, Law of Torts, Section 46, p. 292 (4th ed. 1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Southern Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc.
See Mid-Texas Communications Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, 615 F.2d 1372 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 286 , 66 L.Ed.2d 140 (1980); International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. v. General Telephone and Electronics Corp., 518 F.2d 913, 935-36 (9th Cir. 1975) ("(T)he fact of regulation is significant, but not because it embodies a doctrinal scheme different from the antitrust law; the sole legal perspective is that afforded by the antitrust law."). 29 As for the second reason-the presence of a state interest in the challenged conduct-the state actio…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Southern Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc.
See Mid-Texas Communications Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, 615 F.2d 1372 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 286 , 66 L.Ed.2d 140 (1980); International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. v. General Telephone and Electronics Corp., 518 F.2d 913, 935-36 (9th Cir. 1975) (“[T]he fact of regulation is significant, but not because it embodies a doctrinal scheme different from the antitrust law; the sole legal perspective is that afforded by the antitrust law.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schwab v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.
See, e.g., Sindell v. Abbott Labs., 26 Cal.3d 588 , 163 Cal.Rptr. 132 , 607 P.2d 924 (Cal.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 285 , 66 L.Ed.2d 140 (1980); Hymowitz v. Eli Lilly & Co., 73 N.Y.2d 487 , 541 N.Y.S.2d 941 , 539 N.E.2d 1069 (N.Y.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 944 , 110 S.Ct. 350 , 107 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989); In re DES Cases, 789 F.Supp. 552 (E.D.N.Y.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hamilton v. Accu-Tek
See Hymowitz, 73 N.Y.2d at 508 , 541 N.Y.S.2d at 947 ; see also Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories, 26 Cal.3d 588 , 163 Cal.Rptr. 132 , 607 P.2d 924 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 285 , 66 L.Ed.2d 140 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Barron v. Martin-Marietta Corp.
See, e.g., Sindell v. Abbott Lab., 26 Cal.3d 588 , 163 Cal.Rptr. 132 , 607 P.2d 924 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 286 , 66 L.Ed.2d 140 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Santiago v. Sherwin Williams,eta
See, e.g., id., ___ ____ ___ 607 P.2d at 937 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Monica Santiago v. Sherwin Williams Company
See, e.g., Sindell v. Abbott Labs., 26 Cal.3d 588 , 163 Cal.Rptr. 132, 144-46 , 607 P.2d 924, 936-38 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 285 , 66 L.Ed.2d 140 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Consolidated Gas Company of Florida, Inc. v. City Gas Company of Florida, a Florida Corporation
(2×)
See, e.g., Mid-Texas Communications Sys. v. AT&T, 615 F.2d 1372, 1388-89 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 286, 66 L.Ed.2d 140 (1980); Poster Exchange, 431 F.2d at 339 ; Gamco, Inc. v. Providence Fruit & Produce Bldg., Inc., 194 F.2d 484, 488 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 817 , 73 S.Ct. 11 , 97 L.Ed. 636 (1952). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.
The district court considered, and rejected, alternative liability under the doctrine of Summers v. Tice, 33 Cal.2d 80 , 199 P.2d 1 (1948); see also Restatement (Second) of Torts, § 433B(3) (1965), and under a market share theory, see, e.g., Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories, 26 Cal.3d 588 , 163 Cal.Rptr. 132 , 607 P.2d 924 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 285 , 66 L.Ed.2d 140 (1980). 3 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kinnett v. Mass Gas & Electric Supply Co.
See, e.g., Sindell v. Abbott Labs, 26 Cal.3d 588 , 163 Cal.Rptr. 132 , 607 P.2d 924 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 285 , 66 L.Ed.2d 140 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shackil v. Lederle Laboratories
See, e.g., Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories, 26 Cal. 3d 588 , 163 Cal. Rptr. 132 , 607 P. 2d 924 , cert. den. 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 285 , 66 L.Ed. 2d 140 (1980); and the other DES cases cited infra. The Federal Food & Drug Administration (FDA) has formulated rules and regulations which encompass the licensing, testing, production, distribution, review and approval of each DPT vaccine.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garshman v. Universal Resources Holding, Inc.
See also Mid-Texas Comm. Sys., Inc. v. AT & T, 615 F.2d 1372, 1387 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 [ 101 S.Ct. 286 , 66 L.Ed.2d 140 ] (1980) (regulated monopoly liable under Section 2 if exclusionary conduct towards competitors shown).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garshman v. Universal Resources Holding, Inc.
See also Mid-Texas Comm. Sys., Inc. v. AT & T, 615 F.2d 1372, 1387 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 286 , 66 L.Ed.2d 140 (1980) (regulated monopoly liable under Section 2 only if exclusionary conduct towards competitors shown).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Owens v. Bourns, Inc.
See, e.g., Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories, 26 Cal.3d 588 , 607 P.2d 924 , 163 Cal.Rptr. 132 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 285 , 66 L.Ed.2d 140 (1980) (market-share liability in DES case); see generally Robinson, Multiple Causation in Tort Law: Reflections on the DES cases, 68 Va.L.Rev. 713 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Owens v. Bourns, Inc.
See, e.g., Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories, 26 Cal.3d 588 , 607 P.2d 924 , 163 Cal.Rptr. 132 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 285 , 66 L.Ed.2d 140 (1980) (market-share liability in DES case); see generally Robinson, Multiple Causation in Tort Law: Reflections on the DES cases, 68 Va.L.Rev. 713 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. American Airlines, Inc. And Robert L. Crandall
See also Domed Stadium Hotel, Inc. v. Holiday Inns, Inc., 732 F.2d 480, 487 (5th Cir.1984), Mid-Texas Communications Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 615 F.2d 1372, 1385-86 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 286 , 66 L.Ed.2d 140 (1980), Almeda Mall, Inc. v. Houston Lighting & Power Co., 615 F.2d 343, 351 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 870 , 101 S.Ct. 208 , 66 L.Ed.2d 90 (1980). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re \Agent Orange\" Product Liability Litigation"
(2×)
See, e.g., Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories, 26 Cal.3d 588 , 607 P.2d 924, 935 , 163 Cal.Rptr. 132, 143 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 285 , 66 L.Ed.2d 140 (1980); Collins v. Eli Lilly Co., 116 Wis.2d 166 , 342 N.W.2d 37, 47 (1984). (ii) Application of Enterprise Liability Theory to This Case In one respect, the “Agent Orange” litigation presents an appealing case for the application of enterprise liability in that, like Hall , and unlike the DES and asbestos cases, there are only seven producers.
E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.
v.
Sindell Upjohn Co. v. Sindell Rexall Drug Co. v. Sindell and Abbott Laboratories v. Sindell
v.
Sindell Upjohn Co. v. Sindell Rexall Drug Co. v. Sindell and Abbott Laboratories v. Sindell
No. 80-157; No. 80-158; No. 80-170; No 80-172.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1980.
Consideration, Petitions, Took.
Cited by 18 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 26 Cal. 3d 588, 607 P. 2d 924.