Shuffman v. Hartford Textile Corp., 449 U.S. 921 (1980). · Go Syfert
Search
Shuffman v. Hartford Textile Corp., 449 U.S. 921 (1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
85 citation events across 24 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Tomfohr v. Mayo Foundation (minn, 1990-01-12) · Strongest negative: U.S. Dominator, Inc. v. Factory Ship Robert E. Resoff (ca9, 1985-08-15)
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "but see" U.S. Dominator, Inc. v. Factory Ship Robert E. Resoff
9th Cir. · 1985 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see United States v. Renfro, 620 F.2d 497, 500 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 321 , 66 L.Ed.2d 149 (1980).
cited Cited "but see" U.S. Dominator, Inc. v. Factory Ship Robert E. Resoff
9th Cir. · 1985 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see United States v. Renfro, 620 F.2d 497, 500 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 321 , 66 L.Ed.2d 149 (1980).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Tomfohr v. Mayo Foundation
Minn. · 1990 · confidence medium
Riegel Textile Corp. v. Gryc, 449 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 320 , 66 L.Ed.2d 149 *124 (1980); Watts v. Erickson, 244 Minn. 264, 268-69 , 69 N.W.2d 626, 629 (1955); Audette v. Lindahl, 231 Minn. 239, 242 , 42 N.W.2d 717, 719 (1950).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Bertoli
D.N.J. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Renfro, 620 F.2d 497, 500-01 (5th Cir.) (evidence of FBI agent’s bias properly excluded under Rule 403 where basis of relevance was allegation that agent had offered immunity to witnesses in exchange for testimony), ce rt. denied, 449 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 321 , 66 L.Ed.2d 149 (1980); United States v. Johnson, 605 F.2d 1025, 1030 (7th Cir.1979) (evidence indicating “indictment was a political instrument” properly excluded under Rule 403 because admission would have “permitted excursions into extraneous and collateral matters”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1033 , 100 S.…
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Hively (2×)
M.D. Penn. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Renfro, 620 F.2d 497, 500-501 (5th Cir. 1980), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 321 , 66 L.Ed.2d 149 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. James McCollom
5th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Renfro, 620 F.2d 497 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 321 , 66 L.Ed.2d 149 (1981); United States v. Bright, 588 F.2d 504 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979); United States v. Wells, 525 F.2d 974 (5th Cir. 1976).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Joly
Conn. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See State v. Wade, 96 Conn. 238, 247-48 , 113 A. 458 (1921); see also United States v. Renfro, 620 F.2d 497, 501 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 921 , 101 S. Ct. 321 , 66 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Forster v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
Minn. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Gryc v. Dayton-Hudson Corp., 297 N.W.2d 727 (Minn.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 320 , 66 L.Ed.2d 149 (1980) (where this court observed that the Flammable Fabrics Act had been amended to expressly confirm that a *660 pajama manufacturer’s compliance with federal consumer safety rules did not relieve the manufacturer of liability at common law or under state statute).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Estate of Hartz v. Nelson
Minn. Ct. App. · 1989 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Gryc v. Dayton-Hudson Corp., 297 N.W.2d 727 (Minn.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 320 , 66 L.Ed.2d 149 (1980). 7 Appellant’s conduct in this case is not like a manufacturer that continues to produce and distribute defective products after discovering their harmful effects.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Forster v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
Minn. Ct. App. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Gryc v. Dayton-Hudson Corp., 297 N.W.2d 727 (Minn.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 320 , 66 L.Ed.2d 149 (assessment of punitive damages notwithstanding a preemption provision in the Flammable Fabrics Act); Pikop v. Burlington Northern R.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ellsworth v. Sherne Lingerie, Inc. (2×)
Md. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Gryc v. Dayton-Hudson Corp., 297 N.W.2d 727 (Minn.1980), ce rt. denied, 449 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 320 , 66 L.Ed.2d 149 (1980) (affirming an award for punitive damages despite evidence of compliance with the Flammable Fabrics Act). 17 The reports are material to the issues and tend to establish the proposition that the nightgown as sold was unreasonably dangerous to prospective users, and therefore the reports should not have been excluded on grounds of relevance.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Shuffman
v.
Hartford Textile Corp.
No. 80-288.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 20, 1980.
449 U.S. 921
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.