green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
10.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1995 ·
…seemingly independent transactions may be revealed as parts of a single conspiracy by their place in a pattern of regularized activity involving a significant continuity of membership.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 40 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Floyd Mayweather, Carlos Montoya, Angel Miyares, Marcus Manning, and Duncan Martin
seemingly independent transactions may be revealed as parts of a single conspiracy by their place in a pattern of regularized activity involving a significant continuity of membership.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Charles Hughes (88-1658), Luckett Larry (88-1659), Sanford Hoskow (88-1660), Basem Kandah (88-1661), and Dale Dudley (88-1751)
seemingly independent transactions may be revealed as parts of a single conspiracy by their place in a pattern of regularized activity involving a significant continuity of membership.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Sun Valley Ranches, Inc. v. Equitable Life Assurance Society
n contrast to other cases in which we have addressed comparable mootness problems, all essential parties are before the court.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Rafael Moreno Morales, United States of America v. Angel Perez Casillas, United States of America v. Jaime Quiles Hernandez, United States of America v. Rafael Torres Marrero, United States of America v. Juan Bruno Gonzalez, United States of America v. Nelson Gonzalez Perez, United States of America v. William Colon Berrios, United States of America v. Jose Rios Polanco, United States of America v. Nazario Mateo Espada
clear showing of substantial prejudice
cited
Cited "see"
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Bertrand
See Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Tucker, 181 Conn. 607, 609 , 436 A.2d 1259 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S. Ct. 363 , 66 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wells Fargo Bank of Minnesota, N.A. v. Morgan
Milne, supra, § 17.06, p. 395; see Hartford National Bank & Trust Co. v. Tucker, 181 Conn. 296, 298 , 435 A.2d 350 (public sale of property ordered while proceedings were stayed was of no force and effect), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S. Ct. 363 , 66 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fegurgur
See United States v. Myers, 635 F.2d 932 (2d Cir.1980), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 364 , 66 L.Ed.2d 221 (1980) (discussing Hampton v. United States, 425 U.S. 484 , 96 S.Ct. 1646 , 48 L.Ed.2d 113 (1976)); United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578 (3d Cir. 1982); see also United States v. Lemaster, 40 M.J. 178 (C.M.A.1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas Lee Farmer
See United States v. French, 628 F.2d 1069, 1075 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 364 , 66 L.Ed.2d 221 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas Lee Farmer
See United States v. French, 628 F.2d 1069, 1075 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry Lee Taylor, Randy Warren, Hernando Tan De Castro
See United States v. Grassi, 616 F.2d 1295, 1303 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 363 , 66 L.Ed.2d 220 (1980) (defendant, by working through common hub, can relate his activities to others); 2 Stitzer, 785 F.2d 1506 (single conspiracy where one source for five suppliers).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re City Equities Anaheim, Ltd.
See In re Springpark Assocs., 623 F.2d 1377 , 1380-81 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 364 , 66 L.Ed.2d 221 (1980) (bankruptcy court has inherent power to enforce settlement providing for termination of automatic stay to permit foreclosure). 4 Along with this power, of course, come the attendant limitations. 15 On appeal, our standard of review appears to be for abuse of discretion.
discussed
Cited "see"
City Equities Anaheim, Ltd. v. Lincoln Plaza Development Co. (In re City Equities Anaheim, Ltd.)
See In re Springpark Assocs., 623 F.2d 1377, 1380-81 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 364 , 66 L.Ed.2d 221 (1980) (bankruptcy court has inherent power to enforce settlement providing for termination of automatic stay to permit foreclosure). 4 Along with this power, of course, come the attendant limitations.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Sepulveda, United States of America v. Edgar Sepulveda, United States of America v. Edward W. Welch, Jr., United States of America v. Arline S. Welch, United States of America v. Kevin Cullinane, United States of America v. Cheryl T. Johnson, United States of America v. Richard F. Labrie, United States of America v. Tony Rood, United States of America v. William D. Wallace, United States of America v. Ernest F. Langlois
See Ortiz, 966 F.2d at 715 ; United States v. Perkins, 926 F.2d 1271, 1283 (1st Cir.1991); see generally United States v. Ciampaglia, 628 F.2d 632, 638 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 365 , 66 L.Ed.2d 221 (1980); United States v. Petrozziello, 548 F.2d 20 , 23 n. 3 (1st Cir.1977). 53 On five occasions, at least one defendant objected to testimony anent coconspirators' out-of-court statements. 11 We treat these objections as fully preserved--after all, the district court told counsel that it deemed an objection by one defendant sufficient to preserve the rights of all defenda…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sepulveda
See Ortiz, 966 F.2d at 715 ; United States v. Perkins, 926 F.2d 1271, 1283 (1st Cir.1991); see generally United States v. Ciampaglia, 628 F.2d 632, 638 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 365 , 66 L.Ed.2d 221 (1980); United States v. Petrozziello, 548 F.2d 20 , 23 n. 3 (1st Cir.1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Maurice Isabel, United States of America v. Ronald Descoteaux, A/K/A Piece of Cake, A/K/A Wacky Ron
See United States v. Ciampaglia, 628 F.2d 632, 638 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 365 , 66 L.Ed.2d 221 (1980). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rivieccio
See United States v. Myers, 635 F.2d 932 , 941 n. 10 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 364 , 66 L.Ed.2d 221 (1980); United States v. James, 493 F.2d 323, 326-27 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 849 , 95 S.Ct. 87 , 42 L.Ed.2d 79 (1974); Jones v. United States, 342 F.2d 863, 873 (D.C.Cir. 1964) (en banc). 8 This standard differs from that used to determine whether a judgment of conviction should be reversed because of the admission of illegally obtained evidence at trial.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bob D. Scruggs, United States of America v. Terrence Lee Lewis
See United States v. Cole, 622 F.2d 98 , 100 n. 2 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Simon Lee Holmes
See United States v. Cole, 622 F.2d 98 , 100 n. 2 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 363 , 66 L.Ed.2d 221 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Barker
See United States v. Grassi, 616 F.2d 1295, 1300 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 363 , 66 L.Ed.2d 220 (1980) (James hearing “mandated”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Karen Bags, Inc.
The Myers district court addressed the issue of targeting in the Abscam “stings” and concluded that the prosecution needed no “probable cause” or even “reasonable suspicion” as a constitutional predicate to offering bribes to the defendant congressmen. 527 F.Supp. at 1226 ; accord, United States v. Myers, 635 F.2d 932, 940-41 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 364 , 66 L.Ed.2d 221 (1980); United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 609 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Greichunos
See United States v. Ciampaglia, 628 F.2d 632, 639-40 (1st Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 365 , 66 L.Ed.2d 221 (1980), United States v. DiFrancesco, 604 F.2d 769, 775 (2d Cir.1979), rev’d on other grounds, 449 U.S. 117 , 101 S.Ct. 426 , 66 L.Ed.2d 328 (1980); United States v. Partin, 552 F.2d 621, 644-45 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 298 , 54 L.Ed.2d 189 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John M. Arruda, United States of America v. Edward Ringland
See United States v. Ciampaglia, 628 F.2d 632, 638 (1st Cir.), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 365 , 66 L.Ed.2d 221 , 449 U.S. 1038 , 101 S.Ct. 618 , 66 L.Ed.2d 501 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edwin Thomas Barrett
See United States v. Borrelli, 621 F.2d 1092, 1095 (10th Cir.) (lay-opinion identification admissible under Rule 701 where defendant’s appearance had significantly changed since time of robbery), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 365 , 66 L.Ed.2d 222 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lehr
See United States v. Ciampaglia, 628 F.2d 632, 640 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 365 , 66 L.Ed.2d 221 (1980) (noting that no court has held disclosure of participation in the witness protection program to be grounds for mistrial). 11 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William J. O'connell, United States of America v. Richard Crossman
See United States v. Ciampaglia, 628 F.2d 632 , 643 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 365 , 66 L.Ed.2d 221 (1980); 1 C.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward A. Cincotta, United States of America v. John Zero, United States of America v. Mystic Fuel, Inc.
See United States v. Ciampaglia, 628 F.2d 632, 642-43 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 365 , 66 L.Ed.2d 221 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Capone, United States of America v. Richard Murnane
See United States v. Ciampaglia, 628 F.2d 632, 639 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 365 , 66 L.Ed.2d 221 (1982) (there is no due process violation in the absence of bad faith delay).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re United States
(2×)
See United States v. Myers, 635 F.2d 932, 935-36 (2d Cir.) (congressman may challenge prosecution on separation of powers grounds on interlocutory appeal), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 364 , 66 L.Ed.2d 221 (1980). 4 These issues have yet to be resolved definitively by the Supreme Court or by this circuit.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hastings
(2×)
See United States v. Myers, 635 F.2d 932, 935-36 (2d Cir.) (congressman may challenge prosecution on separation of powers grounds on interlocutory appeal), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 364 , 66 L.Ed.2d 221 (1980). 4 These issues have yet to be resolved definitively by the Supreme Court or by this circuit.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Neil Roe, A/K/A Nick Shelby and Ray Tietjen
See United States v. Grassi, 616 F.2d 1295, 1300 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 363 , 66 L.Ed.2d 220 (1980) (James hearing “mandated”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bermudez
These courts have recognized that testimony about a witness’ participation in a witness protection program, although prejudicial, ‘‘is permissible so long as the prosecutor does not attempt to exploit it.’’ United States v. DiFrancesco, supra, 604 F.2d 775 ; see id. (‘‘[s]ince a defendant often will seek to impeach a partic- ipating witness by showing that he has received signifi- cant benefits while in the program, the government may desire to bring out the witness’ participation during direct examination in order to avoid an inference that the government was attempting to hid…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bermudez
Ed. 2d 328 (1980); see also United States v. Ciampaglia, 628 F.2d 632, 640 (1st Cir.) (risk of undue prejudice to defendant by government’s reference to witness’ participation in ‘‘witness protection program’’ generally minimal when not exploited by prosecution), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S. Ct. 365 , 66 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dianne Sutherland, United States of America v. Alan W. Fini
Petrozziello, 548 F.2d at 23 ; see also United States v. Ciampaglia, 628 F.2d 632, 637-38 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 365 , 66 L.Ed.2d 221 and 449 U.S. 1038 , 101 S.Ct. 618 , 66 L.Ed.2d 501 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Menashe
Francis without any reason to believe he wanted to commit a crime is immaterial, since the Constitution does not require reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing before commencing an undercover investigation. 4 United States v. Gamble, 737 F.2d 853, 860 (10th Cir.1984); see also United States v. Myers, 635 F.2d 932, 941 (2d Cir.) (government need not have a reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing before offering a bribe to a public official), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 364 , 66 L.Ed.2d 221 (1980); United States v. Jenrette, 744 F.2d 817 , 823-24 & n. 13 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Antonio Fernandez, Jorge Recarey, Mariano Villa Del Ray
(2×)
See also United States v. Grassi, 616 F.2d 1295, 1302 (5th Cir.) ("Whether joinder is sound under Rule 8(b) is to be determined from the face of the indictment.”), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 363 , 66 L.Ed.2d 220 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard A. Carroll
See United States v. Petrozziello, 548 F.2d 20, 23 (1st Cir.1977); see also United States v. Ciampaglia, 628 F.2d 632, 638 (1st Cir.) cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 365 , 66 L.Ed.2d 221 (1980) (trial judge must consider evidence presented by both prosecution and defense when making Petrozziello finding).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Montoya
See, e.g., United States v. Ciampaglia, 628 F.2d 632, 638 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 365 , 66 L.Ed.2d 221 (1980); United States v. Bell, 573 F.2d 1040, 1044 (8th Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Johnnie Bernard Mack (86-1536), United States of America v. Betty Reese (86-1832)
See also United States v. Grassi, 616 F.2d 1295, 1302 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 363 , 66 L.Ed.2d 220 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert J. Cohen
The courts have held that Enmons “merely carved out a labor exception to the traditional law of extortion codified in the Hobbs Act.” United States v. Zappola, 677 F.2d 264, 269 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 866 , 103 S.Ct. 145 , 74 L.Ed.2d 122 (1982), (citing cases from five other circuits including ours); see also United States v. French, 628 F.2d 1069, 1075 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 101 S.Ct. 364 , 66 L.Ed.2d 221 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Hyson, United States of America v. Edward Ennis, A/K/A \Tiger\"
(2×)
See also United States v. Ciampaglia, 628 F.2d 632, 626 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 365 , 66 L.Ed.2d 221 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Grassi
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 80-430.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 3, 1980.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.