green
Positive treatment
6.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
George Guy Derden, III v. Sheriff Sammie McNeel and Attorney General--State of Mississippi
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Derden, 522 So.2d at 754 4 While one court has cited Rochin v. California, 342 U.S. 165, 173 , 72 S.Ct. 205, 210 , 96 L.Ed. 183 (1952), in support of a cumulative error theory, Walker v. Engle, 703 F.2d 959, 969 (6th Cir.1983), that is rather like citing the Declaration of Independence: general statements about inalienable rights or "fundamental fairness" tell us little about the prerogatives of an individual in concrete factual situations 5 See, e.g., Lundy v. Campbell, 888 F.2d 467, 481 (6th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 950 , 110 S.Ct. 2212 , 109 L.Ed.2d 538 (1990); Bell v. Duckworth, 8…
examined
Cited "but see"
Derden v. McNeel
(4×)
also: Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
The standard for reversal on direct appeal of a criminal 4 While one court has cited Rochin v. California, 342 U.S. 165, 173 , 72 S.Ct. 205, 210 , 96 L.Ed. 183 (1952), in support of a cumulative error theory, Walker v. Engle, 703 F.2d 959, 969 (6th Cir.1983), that is rather like citing the Declaration of Independence: general statements about inalienable rights or "fundamental fairness" tell us little about the prerogatives of an individual in concrete factual situations. 5 See, e.g., Lundy v. Campbell, 888 F.2d 467, 481 (6th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 950 , 110 S.Ct. 2212 , 109 L.Ed.2d…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Braden
See United States v. Chafin, 622 F.2d 927, 930 (6th Cir.) (describing the choice to admit to associating with the principals to a murder as one that an informant “would not lightly make”), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 984 , 101 S.Ct. 401 , 66 L.Ed.2d 246 (1980); see also Harris, 403 U.S. at 583 , 91 S.Ct. 2075 (Burger, C.J., plurality) (noting that “[p]eople do not lightly admit a crime” and thus implying that it is a considered and deliberate choice).
discussed
Cited "see"
George Guy Derden, III v. Sheriff Sammie McNeel and Attorney General--State of Mississippi
(2×)
See United States v. Middlebrooks, 618 F.2d 273, 277 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 984 , 101 S.Ct. 401 , 66 L.Ed.2d 246 (1980); United States v. Candelaria-Gonzalez, 547 F.2d 291, 297 (5th Cir.1977); United States v. Sheldon, 544 F.2d 213, 219 (5th Cir.1976); United States v. Diharce-Estrada, 526 F.2d 637, 638, 640 (5th Cir.1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Charles Woods v. Evansville Press Company, Inc., the E.W. Scripps Company
See Yiamouyiannis v. Consumers Union of the United States, 619 F.2d 932, 940 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 839 , 101 S.Ct. 117 , 66 L.Ed.2d 246 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sylvester Tolliver, Gerald Elwood, Danielle Bernard Metz, Gennero Arthur, Noah Moore, Jr., Marlo Helmstetter, Glenn Metz, and Shane Sterling, United States of America v. Noah Moore, Jr.
See United States v. Marx, 635 F.2d at 439 ("[a]ssent to a conspiracy may be inferred from acts which furthered the purpose of the conspiracy."); see also United States v. Middlebrooks, 618 F.2d 273, 278 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 984 , 101 S.Ct. 401 , 66 L.Ed.2d 246 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tolliver
See United States v. Marx, 635 F.2d at 439 (“[a]ssent to a conspiracy may be inferred from acts which furthered the purpose of the conspiracy.”); see also United States v. Middlebrooks, 618 F.2d 273, 278 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 984 , 101 S.Ct. 401 , 66 L.Ed.2d 246 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Flores-Chapa
As the Court noted in Marx, “assent to a conspiracy may be inferred from acts which furthered the purpose of the conspiracy.” United States v. Marx, 635 F.2d 436, 439 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981); see also United States v. Middlebrooks, 618 F.2d 273, 278 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 984 , 101 S.Ct. 401 , 66 L.Ed.2d 246 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mark Prieskorn
(2×)
Intentional participation in a criminal conspiracy, however, “need not be proved by direct evidence; a common purpose and plan may be inferred from a ‘development and a collocation of circumstances.’ ” Moreover, to be guilty of a single conspiracy, the “conspirators need not know each other or be privy to the details of each enterprise comprising the conspiracy ... as long as the evidence is sufficient to show that each defendant possessed full knowledge of the conspiracy’s general purpose and scope.” Id. (citations omitted); see also United States v. Middlebrooks, 618 F.2d 273, …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Linn Co-Operative Oil Co. v. Quigley
(2×)
See also Ligons v. Bechtel Power Corp., 625 F.2d 771, 773 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 101 S.Ct. 400 , 66 L.Ed.2d 246 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Graydon
v.
Pasadena Redevelopment Agency (Hahn, Inc., Real Party in Interest)
v.
Pasadena Redevelopment Agency (Hahn, Inc., Real Party in Interest)
No. 80-438.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 10, 1980.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.