Artway v. Del Tufo, 449 U.S. 997 (1980). · Go Syfert
Artway v. Del Tufo, 449 U.S. 997 (1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Walter J.D. Moffett v. Roland E. McCauley John R. Gagnon, and Ronald L. Paul (ca7, 1984-01-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Walter J.D. Moffett v. Roland E. McCauley John R. Gagnon, and Ronald L. Paul
7th Cir. · 1984 · confidence medium
Ellis & Sons Iron Works, Inc., 609 F.2d 820, 823 (5th Cir.1980); United States v. Ledesma, 632 F.2d 670, 674 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 998 , 101 S.Ct. 539 , 66 L.Ed.2d 296 *585 (1980); Fed.R.Evid. 103(a).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Jack D. Brocksmith
7th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ledesma, 632 F.2d 670, 679 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 998 , 101 S.Ct. 539 , 66 L.Ed.2d 296 (1980).
discussed Cited "see" R.E. Davis Chemical Corp. v. Nalco Chemical Co.
N.D. Ill. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ledesma, 632 F.2d 670, 679 (7th Cir.) (“[I]t is well settled that ‘each mailing in furtherance of a scheme to defraud is a separate offense under 18 U.S.C. § 1341 even if there is but one scheme involved.’ ”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 998 , 101 S.Ct. 539 , 66 L.Ed.2d 296 (1980); and United States v. Clausen, 792 F.2d 102 , 104 n. 4 (8th Cir.) (“Each separate interstate telephone call in furtherance of a scheme to defraud ... constitutes a separate offense under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 .”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 858 , 107 S.Ct. 20…
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Pedro M. Gonzalez-Sanchez, United States of America v. Carlos Latorre, United States of America v. Manuel Parrilla-Marquez
1st Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ledesma, 632 F.2d 670, 675-76 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 998 , 101 S.Ct. 539 , 66 L.Ed.2d 296 (1980); see also United States v. Davidson, 760 F.2d 97, 98-99 (6th Cir.1985). 53 .
cited Cited "see" Radionic Industries, Inc. v. GTE Products Corp.
N.D. Ill. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ledesma, 632 F.2d 670, 677-78 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 998 , 101 S.Ct. 539 , 66 L.Ed.2d 296 (1980).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Norman Z. Flick and Lowell G. Maynard, United States of America v. Norman Z. Flick and Lowell G. Maynard
7th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ledesma, 632 F.2d 670, 675 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 998 , 101 S.Ct. 539 , 66 L.Ed.2d 296 (1980); United States v. Flaxman, 495 F.2d 344, 349 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1031 , 95 S.Ct. 512 , 42 L.Ed.2d 306 (1974).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ferleger v. First American Mortgage Co.
N.D. Ill. · 1987 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Ledesma, 632 F.2d 670, 679 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 998 , 101 S.Ct. 539 , 66 L.Ed.2d 296 (1980). 2 *588 Second, First American suggests that the Ferlegers have not alleged mail fraud because the mailings involved were routine and contained no misrepresentations.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Henry Daniel Stull, Sr., Henry Daniel Stull, Jr., and Patricia Mooradian
6th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Ledesma, 632 F.2d 670 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 998 , 101 S.Ct. 539 , 66 L.Ed.2d 296 (1980); Hanrahan v. United States, 348 F.2d 363 (D.C.Cir.1965), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 845 , 88 S.Ct. 95 , 19 L.Ed.2d 111 (1967); Milan v. United States, 322 F.2d 104 (5th Cir.1963), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 911 , 84 S.Ct. 1174 , 12 L.Ed.2d 181 (1964).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Priscilla R. Scott, United States of America v. Stephen Rodger Wilson
4th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, United States v. Ledesma, 632 F.2d 670, 675 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 998 , 101 S.Ct. 539 , 66 L.Ed.2d 296 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Artway
v.
Del Tufo, United States Attorney
No. 80-5507.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 17, 1980.
449 U.S. 997
Published

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.