green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Walter J.D. Moffett v. Roland E. McCauley John R. Gagnon, and Ronald L. Paul
Ellis & Sons Iron Works, Inc., 609 F.2d 820, 823 (5th Cir.1980); United States v. Ledesma, 632 F.2d 670, 674 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 998 , 101 S.Ct. 539 , 66 L.Ed.2d 296 *585 (1980); Fed.R.Evid. 103(a).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jack D. Brocksmith
See United States v. Ledesma, 632 F.2d 670, 679 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 998 , 101 S.Ct. 539 , 66 L.Ed.2d 296 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
R.E. Davis Chemical Corp. v. Nalco Chemical Co.
See United States v. Ledesma, 632 F.2d 670, 679 (7th Cir.) (“[I]t is well settled that ‘each mailing in furtherance of a scheme to defraud is a separate offense under 18 U.S.C. § 1341 even if there is but one scheme involved.’ ”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 998 , 101 S.Ct. 539 , 66 L.Ed.2d 296 (1980); and United States v. Clausen, 792 F.2d 102 , 104 n. 4 (8th Cir.) (“Each separate interstate telephone call in furtherance of a scheme to defraud ... constitutes a separate offense under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 .”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 858 , 107 S.Ct. 20…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pedro M. Gonzalez-Sanchez, United States of America v. Carlos Latorre, United States of America v. Manuel Parrilla-Marquez
See United States v. Ledesma, 632 F.2d 670, 675-76 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 998 , 101 S.Ct. 539 , 66 L.Ed.2d 296 (1980); see also United States v. Davidson, 760 F.2d 97, 98-99 (6th Cir.1985). 53 .
cited
Cited "see"
Radionic Industries, Inc. v. GTE Products Corp.
See United States v. Ledesma, 632 F.2d 670, 677-78 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 998 , 101 S.Ct. 539 , 66 L.Ed.2d 296 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Norman Z. Flick and Lowell G. Maynard, United States of America v. Norman Z. Flick and Lowell G. Maynard
See United States v. Ledesma, 632 F.2d 670, 675 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 998 , 101 S.Ct. 539 , 66 L.Ed.2d 296 (1980); United States v. Flaxman, 495 F.2d 344, 349 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1031 , 95 S.Ct. 512 , 42 L.Ed.2d 306 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ferleger v. First American Mortgage Co.
See, e.g., United States v. Ledesma, 632 F.2d 670, 679 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 998 , 101 S.Ct. 539 , 66 L.Ed.2d 296 (1980). 2 *588 Second, First American suggests that the Ferlegers have not alleged mail fraud because the mailings involved were routine and contained no misrepresentations.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Henry Daniel Stull, Sr., Henry Daniel Stull, Jr., and Patricia Mooradian
See, e.g., United States v. Ledesma, 632 F.2d 670 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 998 , 101 S.Ct. 539 , 66 L.Ed.2d 296 (1980); Hanrahan v. United States, 348 F.2d 363 (D.C.Cir.1965), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 845 , 88 S.Ct. 95 , 19 L.Ed.2d 111 (1967); Milan v. United States, 322 F.2d 104 (5th Cir.1963), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 911 , 84 S.Ct. 1174 , 12 L.Ed.2d 181 (1964).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Priscilla R. Scott, United States of America v. Stephen Rodger Wilson
See also, United States v. Ledesma, 632 F.2d 670, 675 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 998 , 101 S.Ct. 539 , 66 L.Ed.2d 296 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Artway
v.
Del Tufo, United States Attorney
v.
Del Tufo, United States Attorney
No. 80-5507.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 17, 1980.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.