green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
9.5 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 34 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. $173,081.04 in U.S. Currency
Cf. United States v. Busher, 817 F.2d 1409 (9th Cir.1987) (RICO forfeitures may violate Eighth Amendment); but see United States v. Grande, 620 F.2d 1026 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 830 , 101 S.Ct. 98 , 66 L.Ed.2d 35 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. $173,081.04 In U.S. Currency And One Personal Check Drawn By Jaime Buendia
Cf. United States v. Busher, 817 F.2d 1409 (9th Cir.1987) (RICO forfeitures may violate Eighth Amendment); but see United States v. Grande, 620 F.2d 1026 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 830 , 101 S.Ct. 98 , 66 L.Ed.2d 35 (1980) 7 See also 31 U.S.C.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Tremblay, 97-1816 (2003)
his circuit has consistently required an absolute disparity of over 10 . . . before a prima facie case is established
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In re Allstate Ins. Co.
irregularities or defects in the removal procedure . . . ordinarily do not provide grounds for remand. they may be cured by amendment in the federal court.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Allstate Insurance Company
irregularities or defects in the removal procedure ... ordinarily do not provide grounds for remand. they may be cured by amendment in the federal court.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
National Steel Service Center, Inc. v. Gibbons
(2×)
a question of possible liability for damage resulting from carriage of a commodity is therefore within the commission's jurisdiction as the regulator of the economics of interstate rail transport.
discussed
Cited "see"
J. Cooper & Associates, Inc. v. United States
Contracts with the government for services or supplies typically fit into one of three different categories: “ ‘those for a definite quantity, those for an indefinite quantity and those for requirements.’ ” Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc., v. Barram, 226 F.3d 1329, 1331 (Fed.Cir.2000) (quoting Tomcello v. United States, 231 Ct.Cl. 20, 28 , 681 F.2d 756, 761-62 (1982)); accord Mason v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 436, 444 , 615 F.2d 1343, 1347 (1980), (“Generally speaking, where services are to be provided to the Government, the contract must be one of three possible types-definite quantity…
cited
Cited "see"
ca9 1995
See id. at 1414-15 n. 9 (citing United States v. Grande, 620 F.2d 1026 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 830 , 101 S.Ct. 98 , 66 L.Ed.2d 35 and 449 U.S. 919 , 101 S.Ct. 317 , 66 L.Ed.2d 146 (1980)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. $69,292.00 in U.S. Currency
See id. at 1414-15 n. 9 (citing United States v. Grande, 620 F.2d 1026 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 830 , 101 S.Ct. 98 , 66 L.Ed.2d 35 and 449 U.S. 919 , 101 S.Ct. 317 , 66 L.Ed.2d 146 (1980)).
discussed
Cited "see"
E.W. Bliss Co. v. United States
See Mason v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 436 , 443 n. 5, 615 F.2d 1343 , 1346 n. 5 (“If the contract contains such a minimum quantity clause, the buyer is required to purchase at least the minimum amount, but that is the extent of the legal obligation----”), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 830 , 101 S.Ct. 98 , 66 L.Ed.2d 35 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Norman Hunter Lamson
Fogel, 901 F.2d at 25 ; see United States v. Grande, 620 F.2d 1026 , 1036 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 830 (1980); United States v. Moore, 586 F.2d 1029, 1032 (4th Cir. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vanguard Security Inc. v. United States
See Mason v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 436, 449 , 615 F.2d 1343, 1350 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 830 , 101 S.Ct. 98 , 66 L.Ed.2d 35 (1980) (guaranteed minimum quantity clause would be rendered superfluous if contract not construed as indefinite quantity).
discussed
Cited "see"
Presbytery of Seattle v. King County
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Department of Natural Resources v. Thurston Cy., 92 Wn.2d 656 , 601 P.2d 494 (1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 830 , 66 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Glenwood M. Ford
Parodi, 703 F.2d at 780 ; see United States v. Butler, 611 F.2d 1066, 1071 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 830 , 101 S.Ct. 97 , 66 L.Ed.2d 35 (1980); United States v. Provenzano, 688 F.2d 194, 199 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 492 , 74 L.Ed.2d 634 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Willie Joseph Causey, Jr.
(2×)
See United States v. Butler, 611 F.2d 1066 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 830 , 101 S.Ct. 97 , 66 L.Ed.2d 35 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Texas Catastrophe Property Insurance Ass'n v. Council of Co-Owners of Saida II Towers Condominium Ass'n
(2×)
See Beacon National Insurance Co. v. Texas State Board of Insurance, 582 S.W.2d 616, 617 (Tex.Civ.App.-Austin 1979, writ ref'd n.r.e.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 829 , 101 S.Ct. 96 , 66 L.Ed.2d 33 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Taylor v. State
See United States v. Butler, 611 F.2d 1066, 1071 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 830 , 101 S.Ct. 97 , 66 L.Ed.2d 35 (1980); United States v. Rice, 550 F.2d 1364, 1369-70 (5th *816 Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 954 , 98 S.Ct. 479 , 54 L.Ed.2d 312 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Western Pioneer, Inc. v. United States
See Mason v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 436 , 615 F.2d 1343 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 830 , 101 S.Ct. 98 , 66 L.Ed.2d 35 (1980); Inland Container, Inc. v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 478 , 512 F.2d 1073 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rowden v. Texas Catastrophe Property Insurance Ass'n
See Beacon National Insurance Co. v. Texas State Board of Insurance, 582 S.W.2d 616 (Tex.Civ.App. — Austin 1979, writ ref’d n.r.e.) cert. denied, 449 U.S. 829 , 101 S.Ct. 96 , 66 L.Ed.2d 33 . *87 The Act provides that, after its effective date, the temporary board of directors of the appellee association shall submit to the State Board of Insurance (hereinafter Board) for review and approval a proposed plan of operation.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marvin P. Johnson, Robert A. Wilkins, Duane Quamina, Patricia Gordon, Mark Francis Johnson
See United States v. Butler, 611 F.2d 1066, 1071 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 830 , 101 S.Ct. 97 , 66 L.Ed.2d 35 (1980); United States v. Edwards, 549 F.2d 362, 366 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 828 , 98 S.Ct. 107 , 54 L.Ed.2d 87 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Annie Ruth Bovain, Willie Alfred Brown, Dean Rickett, William Laselle Thornton, Charles Finch, William Clyde Perkins, Alvin R. Heath
Accord, United States v. Butler, 611 F.2d 1066, 1071 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 830 , 101 S.Ct. 97 , 66 L.Ed.2d 35 (1980). *610 (1) bona fide need for the testimony; (2) the substance of the desired testimony; (3) its exculpatory nature and effect; and (4) that the designated co-defendant will in fact testify at a separate trial.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rosenblum v. Borough of Closter
The District Judge held that: The court is given substantial discretion to craft appropriate sanctions, and an injunction from filing any further actions is an appropriate sanction to curb groundless, repetitive, and frivolous suits: "A court faced with a litigant engaged in a pattern of frivolous litigation has the authority to implement a remedy that may include restrictions on that litigant's access to the court." Lysiak v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 816 F. 2d 311, 313 (7th Cir. 1987); see also Pavilonis [v. King ], 626 F. 2d [1075,] 1079 [ (1st Cir.) ] (injunction pertaining to all …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carparts Distribution Center, Inc. v. Automotive Wholesaler's Association of New England, Inc.
Yet a court may not do so without at least giving plaintiffs notice of the proposed action and affording them an opportunity to address the issue.” Literature, Inc. v. Quinn, 482 F.2d 372, 374 (1st Cir.1973) (internal citations omitted); see also Pavilonis v. King, 626 F.2d 1075 , 1078 & n. 6 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 829 , 101 S.Ct. 96 , 66 L.Ed.2d 34 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kevin C. Purvis v. Joseph Ponte
Compare Pavilonis v. King, 626 F.2d 1075, 1078 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 829 , 101 S.Ct. 96 , 66 L.Ed.2d 34 (1980) (affirming dismissal where magistrate’s report alerted plaintiff to complaint's deficiencies, which plaintiff failed to cure).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Finley
See also United States v. Grande, 620 F.2d 1026, 1031-32 (4th Cir.) (private contractor who served as a conduit for payments to the official could be convicted as an aider and abettor under the “official right” prong of the Hobbs Act), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 830 , 101 S.Ct. 98 , 66 L.Ed.2d 35 (1980).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Orion Corporation v. State
(4×)
See, e.g., Department of Natural Resources v. Thurston Cy., 92 Wn.2d 656 , 601 P.2d 494 (1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 830 (1980); Maple Leaf Investors, Inc. v. Department of Ecology, 88 Wn.2d 726 , 565 P.2d 1162 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Embedded Moments, Inc. v. International Silver Co.
See, e.g., Mason v. United States, 615 F.2d 1343 , 1346 n. 5 (Ct.Cl.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 830 , 101 S.Ct. 98 , 66 L.Ed.2d 35 (1980); Harvey v. Fearless Farris Wholesale, Inc., 589 F.2d 451, 461 (9th Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jimmie Harold Primrose
See also United States v. Grande, 620 F.2d 1026, 1029-30 (4th Cir.) (mailings of notice to proceed, payment, and bill relating to fraudulently obtained demolition contract), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 830 , 919, 101 S.Ct. 98 , 317, 66 L.Ed.2d 35 , 146 (1980); United States v. Diggs, 613 F.2d 988, 998-99 (D.C.Cir.1979) (mailing of congressional employees’ paychecks, out of which defendant was paid kickbacks), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 2961 , 64 L.Ed.2d 838 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rhea Lucky Nichols and Michael Ford, A/K/A L.D. Haufer
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Butler, 611 F.2d 1066, 1071 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 830 , 101 S.Ct. 97 , 66 L.Ed.2d 35 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Davis
See also, Clifford, supra and United States v. Butler, 611 F.2d 1066, 1069-70 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied 449 U.S. 830 , 101 S.Ct. 97 , 66 L.Ed.2d 35 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ayatollah Syed M. J. Iqbal Jafree v. John R. Barber, Acting Special Agent, Federal Bureau of Investigation
See, e.g., Pavilonis v. King, 626 F.2d 1075 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 829 , 101 S.Ct. 96 , 66 L.Ed.2d 34 (1980); Harrelson v. United States, 613 F.2d 114 (5th Cir. 1980); Green v. White, 616 F.2d 1054 (8th Cir. 1980). 1 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Musto
See also United States v. Butler, 611 F.2d 1066,1070 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 830 , 101 S.Ct. 97 , 66 L.Ed.2d 35 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. J. Richard Barber
See, e.g., United States v. Grande, 620 F.2d 1026, 1031-32 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 830 , 101 S.Ct. 98 , 66 L.Ed.2d 35 (1980) (official misused the office to favor the payor by supplying information and channeling contracts); United States v. Hathaway, 534 F.2d 386, 394-96 (1st Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 64 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976) (payor feared that, without making payment, he would not receive construction contract; the defendant stated he was under pressure to award contract to others, but after payor gave defendant money, payor received contract); United S…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Sun City Community Hospital, Inc. v. United States
See, e.g., Mason v. United States, 222 Ct. Cl. 436 , 615 F. 2d 1343 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 830 (1980); Bishop Engineering Co. v. United States, 180 Ct. Cl. 411, 416 (1967).
Hecker
v.
Township of Dover
v.
Township of Dover
No. 79-1831.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1980.
Super. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.