green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.2 score
“the securities laws, while their central insistence is upon disclosure, were never intended to attempt any such measures of psychoanalysis or preported (sic) self-analysis.”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Loretta Burrell
in most cases motions to try different counts separately have been denied.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ruth Panter v. Marshall Field & Co., Richard Weiss v. Marshall Field & Co.
(4×)
also: Cited as authority (rule)
the securities laws, while their central insistence is upon disclosure, were never intended to attempt any such measures of psychoanalysis or preported (sic) self-analysis.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Leonard Lawson (81-3722) v. Truck Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers, Local Union 100, George S. Leach (81-3540) v. United States Postal Service and National Association of Letter Carriers and Local 43, National Association of Letter Carriers, Defendants
In Gallagher, Judge Phillips stated, "We hold that, in an action against an employer and a Union under LMRA, the same statute of limitations ordinarily should apply as to both defendants." Id. at 169 (emphasis added).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Lawson v. Truck Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers
In Gallagher , Judge Phillips stated, “We hold that, in an action against an employer and a Union under LMRA, the same statute of limitations ordinarily should apply as to both defendants.” Id. at 169 (emphasis added).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nitin Shah
See United States v. Thomas, 593 F.2d 615 , 620 n. 17 (5th Cir.1979) (ruling that the statement was in effect false even if literally true), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 841 , 101 S.Ct. 120 , 66 L.Ed.2d 48 (1980). 12 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wayne Huntsman and Ralph Huntsman
See United States v. Thomas, 593 F.2d 615, 619-20 (5th Cir.1979) (evidence of sham nature of transactions sufficient to show individuals not entitled to receive government benefits, and thus statements to the contrary were false, even though paper structure indicated that the individuals were entitled), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 841 , 101 S.Ct. 120 , 66 L.Ed.2d 48 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mountain Home Properties v. Pine Mountain Lake Ass'n
The court noted the “... sound judicial policy against applying collateral estoppel in cases which concern matters of important public interest.” ( 15 Cal.3d at p. 872 ; accord City of Berkeley v. Superior Court (1980) 26 Cal.3d 515, 520, fn. 5 [ 162 Cal.Rptr. 327 , 606 P.2d 362 ], cert. den. 449 U.S. 840 [ 66 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Ronald L. Christianson v. Pioneer Sand & Gravel Co., Division of Lone Star Industries, Inc.
See Gallagher v. Chrysler Corp., 613 F.2d 167 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 841 , 101 S.Ct. 119 , 66 L.Ed.2d 48 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Jessie L. Washington v. Northland Marine Co., Inc., Shipscalers Local Union No. 541, Amos Burl, Intervenors
See Gallagher v. Chrysler Corp., 613 F.2d 167 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 841 , 101 S.Ct. 119 , 66 L.Ed.2d 48 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Keith A. Brink
See United States v. Thomas, 593 F.2d 615, 623 (5th Cir.), modified on other grounds on rehearing, 604 F.2d 450 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied,- U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 120 , 66 L.Ed.2d 48 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nationwide Life Insurance v. Bankers Leasing Ass'n
See, e.g., United States v. Wexler, 621 F.2d 1218, 1224 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 841 , 101 S.Ct. 119 , 66 L.Ed.2d 48 (1980); In re Sherwood Diversified Servs., Inc., 382 F.Supp. 1359, 1360-61 (S.D.N.Y.1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Carter
See also United States v. Ellis, 493 F.Supp. 1092, 1098 (M.D.Tenn.1979) (finding that errata in court’s instructions to the jury was not a cognizable ground for a post-trial motion for a judgment of acquittal), aff'd, 617 F.2d 604 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 840 , 101 S.Ct. 119 , 66 L.Ed.2d 48 (1980); 2 Charles A. Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure: Criminal § 466, at 654 (2d ed. 1982) (“There is only one ground for a motion for judgment of acquittal.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Victor J. Orena, Also Known as Little Vic
See also United States v. Wexler, 621 F.2d 1218, 1226 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 841 , 101 S.Ct. 119 , 66 L.Ed.2d 48 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Enrique Vasquez
(2×)
United States v. Tedder, 787 F.2d 540 , 542 nn. 2-3 (10th Cir.1986); see also United States v. Strand, 617 F.2d 571, 578 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 841 , 101 S.Ct. 120 , 66 L.Ed.2d 48 (1980). 26 The failure to file a transcript also precludes review of the trial court's evidentiary rulings.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
CWC Fisheries, Inc. v. Bunker
See, e.g., City of Berkeley v. Superior Court, 26 Cal.3d 515 , 162 Cal.Rptr. 327, 330-31 , 606 P.2d 362, 365-66 (Cal.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 840 , 101 S.Ct. 119 , 66 L.Ed.2d 48 (1980); Kootenai Environmental Alliance v. Panhandle Yacht Club, 105 Idaho 622, 625-26 , 671 P.2d 1085, 1088-89 (1983); Caminiti v. Boyle, 107 Wash.2d 662 , 732 P.2d 989, 994 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Henry Daniel Stull, Sr., Henry Daniel Stull, Jr., and Patricia Mooradian
See, e.g., United States v. Wexler, 621 F.2d 1218, 1223 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 841 , 101 S.Ct. 119 , 66 L.Ed.2d 48 (1980); United States v. London, 550 F.2d 206, 210-13 (5th Cir.1977); United States v. Laverick, 348 F.2d 708, 714 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 940 , 86 S.Ct. 391 , 15 L.Ed.2d 350 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William J. Johnson
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Wexler, 621 F.2d 1218 (2d Cir.) (equipment leases), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 841 , 101 S.Ct. 119 , 66 L.Ed.2d 48 (1980); Unit ed States v. Gallipoli, 599 F.2d 100 (5th Cir. 1979) (airline tickets); United States v. Speidel, 562 F.2d 1129 (8th Cir.1977) (quitclaim deeds), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 1468 , 55 L.Ed.2d 505 (1978). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Franjo Ivic, Nedjelko Sovulj, Ivan Cale and Stipe Ivkosic, Defendants
See also United States v. Wexler, 621 F.2d 1218, 1223 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 841 , 101 S.Ct. 119 , 66 L.Ed.2d 48 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mark Steven Phillips and Richard Elliott Grant, Jr., United States of America v. Robert Jay Meinster, A/K/A \Robby\"
Robison, 644 F.2d at 1272 . 71 For a thorough discussion of Blackledge, Jackson, and Hardwick, see Miracle v. Estelle, 592 F.2d 1269 (5th Cir. 1979); see also United States v. Thomas, 593 F.2d 615, 624 (5th Cir.), modified on rehearing, 604 F.2d 450 (5th Cir. 1979), on appeal after remand, 617 F.2d 436 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 841 , 101 S.Ct. 120 , 66 L.Ed.2d 48 (1980) 72 Moreover, at no time did the government inform Myers that he would not be prosecuted on a continuing criminal enterprise count.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Phillips
For a thorough discussion of Blackledge, Jackson, and Hardwick, see Miracle v. Estelle, 592 F.2d 1269 (5th Cir. 1979); see also United States v. Thomas, 593 F.2d 615, 624 (5th Cir.), modified on rehearing, 604 F.2d 450 (5th Cir. 1979), on appeal after remand, 617 F.2d 436 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 841 , 101 S.Ct. 120 , 66 L.Ed.2d 48 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Russell Reed, James S. Doyle, and Thomas Francis Ryan
See, e. g., United States v. Wexler, 621 F.2d 1218, 1225-1226 (2d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 101 S.Ct. 119 , 66 L.Ed.2d 48 (1980); United States v. Arroyo-Angulo, 580 F.2d 1137, 1149 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 618 , 58 L.Ed.2d 260 (1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Angrist
v.
United States and Wexler v. United States
v.
United States and Wexler v. United States
No. 79-2013; No. 79-2017.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1980.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (2) · Tenth Circuit (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 621 F. 2d 1218.