Williams v. New York State Higher Educ. Servs. Corp., 449 U.S. 843 (1980). · Go Syfert
Search
Williams v. New York State Higher Educ. Servs. Corp., 449 U.S. 843 (1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“although the literal meaning of the words chosen by congress is respected, we no longer follow a rigid, semantic approach to statutory construction”
100 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 39 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Roy (ctd, 1984-11-19) · Strongest negative: Talley v. Derwinski (cavc, 1992-04-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Talley v. Derwinski
Vet. App. · 1992 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see U.S. v. Perdue Farms, 680 F.2d 277, 280 (2d Cir.1982) (“[Bjecause the chosen words are not in all instances a reliable indicator of Congress’ intent, [a court] may look to the legislative history of the enactment to determine whether literal application of the statute would ‘pervert its manifest purpose.’ ”) (quoting In Re Adamo, 619 F.2d 216 , 222 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 843 , 101 S.Ct. 125 , 66 L.Ed.2d 52 (1980)).
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) United States v. Roy
D. Conn. · 1984 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
although the literal meaning of the words chosen by congress is respected, we no longer follow a rigid, semantic approach to statutory construction
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Geltzer v. Mooney (In Re MacMenamin's Grill Ltd.)
Bankr. S.D.N.Y. · 2011 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
statute should not be applied strictly in accord with its literal meaning where to do so would pervert its manifest purpose.
discussed Cited "see" Hursey Davis v. Warden, Joliet Correctional Institution at Stateville Michael Lane, Director, Department of Corrections, State of Illinois (2×)
7th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Young, 618 F.2d 1281, 1287-88 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 844 , 101 S.Ct. 126 , 66 L.Ed.2d 52 (1980); United States v. Florence, 456 F.2d 46, 49 (4th Cir.1972); Katz v. United States, 321 F.2d 7, 9 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 903 , 84 S.Ct. 193 , 11 L.Ed.2d 144 (1963).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Steven Peterson, United States of America v. Mary Peterson
8th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Young, 618 F.2d 1281, 1286 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 844 , 101 S.Ct. 126 , 66 L.Ed.2d 52 (1980).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Wayne Roenigk
8th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Young, 618 F.2d 1281, 1289 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 844 , 101 S.Ct. 126 , 66 L.Ed.2d 52 (1980) (probative value of evidence of similar activities by persons other than the defendant outweighed any prejudicial impact where court clearly instructed jury that defendant was not on trial for any conduct not alleged in indictment charging misapplication of bank funds and mail fraud); United States v. King, 572 F.2d 1274, 1275 (8th Cir.1978) (per curiam) (testimony of prior similar crimes by defendant not unduly prejudicial in light of limiting instruction to jury).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Lawrence A. Wilson, United States of America v. Henry Francis Enriquez
8th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Young, 618 F.2d 1281, 1287 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 844 , 101 S.Ct. 126 , 66 L.Ed.2d 52 (1980); United States v. Steffen, 641 F.2d 591, 594 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 943 , 101 S.Ct. 3091 , 69 L.Ed.2d 959 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Lowell B. Marchant
8th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Young, 618 F.2d 1281, 1289 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 844 , 101 S.Ct. 126 , 66 L.Ed.2d 52 (1980); McConkey v. United States, 444 F.2d 788, 790 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 885 , 92 S.Ct. 223 , 30 L.Ed.2d 168 (1971); United States v. Prionas, 438 F.2d 1049, 1054 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 977 , 91 S.Ct. 1683 , 29 L.Ed.2d 144 (1971).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Ronald Clarence Fischel
8th Cir. · 1983 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, United States v. Young, 618 F.2d 1281, 1289 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 844 , 101 S.Ct. 126 , 66 L.Ed.2d 52 (1980).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Michael Peter Collins
8th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Young, 618 F.2d 1281, 1286 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 844 , 101 S.Ct. 126 , 66 L.Ed.2d 52 (1980).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Robert L. Marshall, A/K/A Cito Marshall (2×)
8th Cir. · 1982 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, United States v. Young, 618 F.2d 1281, 1289 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 844 , 101 S.Ct. 126 , 66 L.Ed.2d 52 (1980).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Francis B. Kendall
7th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Inendino, 604 F.2d 458, 461 (7th Cir. 1979) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 844 , 101 S.Ct. 126 , 66 L.Ed.2d 52 (1980); United States v. Mackey, 571 F.2d 376, 383 (7th Cir. 1978).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Alexander (2×)
Mo. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See, United States v. Young, 618 F.2d 1281, 1288 (8th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 844 , 101 S.Ct. 126 , 66 L.Ed.2d 52 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Kenny
E.D.N.Y · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
To demand that they shall not, would be a fantastic pedantry which would serve no purpose.... ”), cert. denied, 333 U.S. 860 , 68 S.Ct. 738 , 92 L.Ed. 1139 (1948); see also United States v. Young, 618 F.2d 1281, 1287-88 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 844 , 101 S.Ct. 126 , 66 L.Ed.2d 52 (1980); Zicarelli v. Dietz, 633 F.2d 312, 316-18 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1083 , 101 S.Ct. 868 , 66 L.Ed.2d 807 (1981).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Rayburn v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 1986 · signal: see also · confidence low
"Mere geographical imbalance [in a master jury list], absent evidence that an identifiable and cognizable segment of the community has been systematically excluded or underrepresented by reason of such imbalance, does not violate the statutory and constitutional requirement that the jury panel represent a `fair cross section of the community.'" United States v. Test , 550 F.2d 577 , 582 n. 4 (10th Cir. 1976); See also United States v. Young , 618 F.2d 1281 , 1288 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 844 , 101 S.Ct. 126 , 66 L.Ed.2d 52 (1980); People v. Chesler , 91 Misc.2d 551 , 398 N.Y.S.2d 320…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. James W. Turpin
8th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
United States v. Evans, 697 F.2d 240, 248 (8th Cir.1983) (footnote and citations omitted); see, e.g., United States v. Young, 618 F.2d 1281, 1289 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 844 , 101 S.Ct. 126 , 66 L.Ed.2d 52 (1980).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Williams
Mo. Ct. App. · 1982 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Young, 618 F.2d 1281, 1288 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied 449 U.S. 844 , 101 S.Ct. 126 , 66 L.Ed.2d 52 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Williams et ux.
v.
New York State Higher Education Services Corp.
No. 79-2072.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1980.
449 U.S. 843
Cited by 12 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 62%
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.