green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.4 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1984 ·
…the standard for finding federal government action under the fifth amendment is the same as that for finding state action under the fourteenth amendment.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hicks v. Southern Maryland Health Systems Agency
(2×)
the standard for finding federal government action under the fifth amendment is the same as that for finding state action under the fourteenth amendment.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hicks v. Southern Maryland Health Systems Agency
(2×)
the standard for finding federal government action under the fifth amendment is the same as that for finding state action under the fourteenth amendment.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Dayringer
See State v. Clark, 592 S.W.2d 709, 713-15 (Mo. banc 1979), cert. denied 449 U.S. 847 , 101 S.Ct. 132 , 66 L.Ed.2d 57 .
examined
Cited "see"
Terry L. Arcoren v. Wenton Peters and John Schooler
(4×)
See Warren v. Government Nat’l Mortgage Assoc., 611 F.2d 1229 (8th Cir.), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 847 , 101 S.Ct. 133 , 66 L.Ed.2d 57 (1980); Roberts v. Cameron-Brown Co., 556 F.2d 356 (5th Cir. 1977); Northrip v. Federal Nat’l Mortgage Assoc., 527 F.2d 23 (6th Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gerardo Valencia
See United States v. Masters, 612 F.2d 1117, 1122 (9th Cir.1979) (permitting testimony that defendant had “express[ed] ... his intention to remain silent during Customs questioning” in order to demonstrate that his subsequent incriminating statements were made voluntarily), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 847 , 101 S.Ct. 134 , 66 L.Ed.2d 57 (1980); United States v. De La Luz Gallegos, 738 F.2d 378, 383 (10th Cir.) (admitting testimony that defendant requested an attorney prior to making unsolicited, self-incriminating statements to law enforcement officials, because “[t]he knowing exercise of def…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Miller
(2×)
See State v. Clark, 592 S.W.2d 709, 718-19 (Mo. banc 1979), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 847 , 101 S.Ct. 132 , 66 L.Ed.2d 57 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Liberty Mortgage Banking, Ltd. v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
(2×)
See e.g., Warren v. Government Nat’l Mortgage Assoc., 611 F.2d *960 1229, 1233 (8th Cir.) (foreclosure action taken by Ginnie Mae which is wholly owned by the United States is not “so closely linked to federal government regulation that it can in actuality be viewed ... as the action of the federal government.... ”), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 847, 101 S.Ct. 133 , 66 L.Ed.2d 57 (1980); Roberts v. Cameron-Brown Co., 556 F.2d 356, 358-60 (5th Cir.1977); Northrip v. Federal Nat’l Mortgage Assoc., 527 F.2d 23, 30-33 (6th Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fidelity Financial Corporation v. Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, Milton Feinerman, President of the Federal Home Loan Bank of S.F.
(2×)
See, e.g., Warren v. Government National Mortgage Association, 611 F.2d 1229, 1232-35 (8th Cir.) (GNMA foreclosure did not constitute governmental action, even though the GNMA was also wholly owned by the government), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 847 , 101 S.Ct. 133 , 66 L.Ed.2d 57 (1980); Northrip v. Federal National Mortgage Association, 527 F.2d 23, 30-33 (6th Cir.1975) (although the FNMA was subject to extensive regulatory and supervisory control, had five of its fifteen directors appointed by the government, and had many employees subject to *1436 the civil service laws, its act of foreclosure …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Warren
v.
Government National Mortgage Assn.
v.
Government National Mortgage Assn.
No. 79-6500.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1980.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Fourth Circuit (4)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.