green
Positive treatment
10.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 48 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
42 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 933, prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,359 Antonio Benedi v. mcneil-p.p.c., Incorporated
(3×)
Id. at 853.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Polansky Ex Rel. State Accident Fund v. Ryobi America Corp.
Id. at 856-57.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
International Shipping Co., S.A. v. Hydra Offshore, Inc.
Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 790 (2d Cir.1980) (“[T]he presence of aliens on two sides of a case destroys diversity jurisdiction.”), cer t. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 5.Ct. 863, 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Linda Anderson, Derriel Anderson v. James E. Malloy, Peter Zes, Edward J. Gibson
(2×)
Id. at 855.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Mitchell
See United States v. Wylie, 625 F.2d 1371, 1381 (9th Cir. 1980) (‘‘Blockburger is merely a method for ascertaining the congressional intent to impose sepa- rate punishment for multiple offenses which arise dur- ing the course of a single act or transaction’’), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S. Ct. 863 , 66 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Arndt v. UBS AG
See Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 790 (2d Cir.1980) (''[Tjhe presence of aliens on two sides of a case destroys diversity jurisdiction”), cer t. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981); accord IIT v. Vencap Ltd., 519 F.2d 1001, 1015 (2d Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Attorney General of Canada v. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc.
See Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 789 (2d Cir.1980) ("[T]he fact that alien parties [are] present on both sides ... destroy[s] complete diversity”), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (a).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Bidermann Industries U.S.A., Inc.
See In re Best Products Co., Inc., 168 B.R. 35, 51 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1994) (citing Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 795 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981)) (federal common law in specialized areas where jurisdiction is not based on diversity has been sanctioned by the Supreme Court since the Erie case was decided).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jenkins v. Virgin Atlantic Airways, Ltd.
See Int’l Shipping Co., 875 F.2d at 391 (“[T]he presence of aliens on two sides of a case destroys diversity jurisdiction.”) (quoting Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 790 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981)); D’Arboise v. Sommelier’s Cellars, 741 F.Supp. 489, 490 (S.D.N.Y.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Marathon Oil Co. v. Ruhrgas
See Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 790 (2d Cir.1980) (noting that the presence of aliens on both sides of the case defeats diversity jurisdiction), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Midwest Specialties, Inc. v. Crown Industrial Products Co.
See Werner v. Upjohn Co., 628 F.2d 848, 858 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 862 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Tonawanda Band of Seneca Indians
See Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 477 F.Supp. 615, 621 (S.D.N.Y.1979), modified on other grounds, 629 F.2d 786 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981); 6 Charles A. Wright, Arthur R.
discussed
Cited "see"
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation v. Tonawanda Band Of Seneca Indians
See Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 477 F.Supp. 615, 621 (S.D.N.Y.1979), modified on other grounds, 629 F.2d 786 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981); 6 CHARLES A. WRIGHT, ARTHUR R.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Lloyd's American Trust Fund Litigation
See Corporación Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786 (2d Cir.1980), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981) (finding jurisdiction under Section 632, in an action alleging fraudulent inducement, on the basis of a letter of credit issued by a federally chartered bank no longer party to the suit); see also Conjugal Soc’y Composed of Juvenal Rosa v. Chicago Title Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
First National Bank of Joliet v. Promatek Medical Systems, Inc.
(2×)
See Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786 (2d Cir.1980) cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981); Consorcio de Fomento Industrial S.A. v. First National Bank of Chicago, 1993 WL 291706 (N.D.Ill.
discussed
Cited "see"
38 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1213, prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,528 in Re Joint Eastern District and Southern District Asbestos Litigation. Anne McPadden Individually and as of the Estate of Martin McPadden (Deceased) v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. Fibreboard Corporation Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation Celotex Corporation Eagle-Picher Industries, Incorporated Gaf Corporation Pittsburgh Corning Corporation H.K. Porter Company, Inc. Owens-Illinois, Incorporated A.P. Green Industries Inc. U.S. Mineral Products Co. A.C. And S. Inc. United States Gypsum Co. National Gypsum Company Babcock & Wilcox Company Combustion Engineering, Inc. Rockwool Manufacturing Co. v. John Crane-Houdaille Inc.
Accord Werner v. Upjohn Co., 628 F.2d 848, 856-58 (4th Cir.1980) (subsequent revised warnings of drug's side effects were not admissible under either negligence or strict products liability principles), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 862 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981). 19 In denying Crane's post-trial motion, the district court concluded that "plaintiff's use of the label evidence focused on the statement that no warning labels were placed on the products at the time of McPadden's exposure, not that the labels were placed on the products later because Crane recognized the danger." 798 F.Supp…
discussed
Cited "see"
McPadden v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
Accord Werner v. Upjohn Co., 628 F.2d 848, 856-58 (4th Cir.1980) (subsequent revised warnings of drug’s side effects were not admissible under either negligence or strict products liability principles), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 862 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re: Koreag, Controle Et Revision S.A.
See Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 795 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Koreag, Controle et Revision S.A. v. Refco F/X Associates, Inc.
See Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 795 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Koreag, Controle et Revision S.A. v. Refco F/X Associates, Inc. (In re Koreag, Controle et Revision S.A.)
See Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 795 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Joanne Kotler, Individually and as Administratrix, Etc. v. The American Tobacco Company
Accord Werner v. Upjohn Co., 628 F.2d 848, 858 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 862 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Don King Productions, Inc. v. Douglas
See Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 793 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981) (choice-of-law .clause in first loan agreement applied to govern related, second loan agreement among same parties, absent indication of parties’ contrary intent).
discussed
Cited "see"
19 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 583, prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 10,904 Sherwin W. Fish and Leona B. Fish, Cross-Appellants v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Diamond International Corporation and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, Georgia-Pacific Corporation and Diamond International Corporation, Cross-Appellees
Accord Werner v. Upjohn Co., 628 F.2d 848, 853 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 862 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981). 15 Nor was the evidence of the warning admissible on the limited issue of the "feasibility" of providing a warning in 1977.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Espinosa
See United States v. Wylie, 625 F.2d 1371, 1382 (9th Cir. 1980) ("we conclude that Congress did intend to allow courts to impose consecutive sentences for conspiracy ( 21 U.S.C. § 846 ), and for substantive offenses ( 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1)), even when the proof necessary to obtain a conviction for the former was necessary to obtain a conviction for the latter offense”), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bank Itec N v. v. J. Henry Schroder Bank & Trust Co.
See Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 793 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981); Hawes Office Systems, Inc. v. Wang Laboratories, Inc., 537 F.Supp. 939, 942 (E.D.N.Y.1982); CBS, Inc. v. Tucker, 412 F.Supp. 1222, 1226 (S.D.N.Y.1976); B.M.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hale v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
“Once evidence admissible for one purpose but inadmissible for another is admitted, the trial court cannot refuse a, requested limiting instruction.” Chematron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc., 682 F.2d 1149, 1185 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1013 , 103 S.Ct. 1254 , 75 L.Ed.2d 483 (1982); see Werner v. Upjohn Co., 628 F.2d 848, 854 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 862 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Larry Hale and Linda Hale v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, the Budd Company. Larry Hale and Linda Hale v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, the Budd Company
Appellees do not contend that Budd had knowledge of the documents but rather argue that the documents were offered to prove defect and that knowledge by the manufacturer of the defect is not required in a strict liability case. 51 "Once evidence admissible for one purpose but inadmissible for another is admitted, the trial court cannot refuse a requested limiting instruction." Chematron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc., 682 F.2d 1149, 1185 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1013 , 103 S.Ct. 1254 , 75 L.Ed.2d 483 (1982); see Werner v. Upjohn Co., 628 F.2d 848, 854 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Glen McCullah Willard Petrey, James Tankersley, and Ewell Scott
(2×)
It has been flatly rejected by the Fifth Circuit, United States v. Pearson, 655 F.2d 569, 570 (5th Cir.1981) (per curiam) (citing United States v. Cowart, 595 F.2d 1023, 1032-34 (5th Cir.1979)); see United States v. Bankston, 603 F.2d 528, 534 (5th Cir.1979) (appropriate test looks "not to the evidence adduced at trial but focuse[s] on the elements of the offense charged"), and the Ninth Circuit, United States v. Wylie, 625 F.2d 1371 , 1381 n. 14 (9th Cir.1980) (citing United States v. Kearney, 560 F.2d 1358, 1367 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 971 , 98 S.Ct. 522 , 54 L.Ed.2d 460 (1977)), …
discussed
Cited "see"
Felix Cinematografica S.r.l. v. Penthouse International, Ltd.
See Corporacion Venezolana v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786 , 790 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981); see also Clarkson Co. Ltd. v. Shaheen, 544 F.2d 624 , n. 5 (2d Cir.1976); but see Bergen Shipping Co. Ltd. v. Japan Marine Servs.
discussed
Cited "see"
Libra Bank Ltd. v. Banco Nacional De Costa Rica, S.A.
See Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales, 629 F.2d 786 , 793 (2d Cir.1980) (where loan agreement contained clause choosing New York law as governing, that choice of law was valid and binding upon loan agreement), ce rt. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981). 28 Under New York law, a covenant in a note providing that the obligator shall pay attorneys’ fees and costs expended in the collection or enforcement of a note is enforceable.
cited
Cited "see"
Bernier v. BOARD OF COUNTY RD. COM'RS FOR IONIA COUNTY
See Werner v. Upjohn Co., 628 F.2d 848 at 853 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 862 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lowe
See United States v. Wylie, 625 F.2d 1371 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lowe
See United States v. Wylie, 625 F.2d 1371 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mohammed Hadi Fekri, National Laboratory Enterprises, Inc., Defendants
See United States v. Wylie, 625 F.2d 1371 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied sub nom., Perluss v. United States, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981) (agent’s suggestion of form of payment not violative of due process); United States v. McQuinn, 612 F.2d 1193 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 955 , 100 S.Ct. 1608 , 63 L.Ed.2d 791 (1980) (agent’s threatening statements to induce defendant to proceed with illegal plan not violative of due process).
discussed
Cited "see"
MARATHON OIL COMPANY, Marathon International Oil Company, and Marathon Petroleum Norge A/S v. A.G. RUHRGAS
See Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 790 (2d Cir.1980) (noting that the presence of aliens on both sides of the case defeats diversity jurisdiction), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bank of America Corp. v. Lemgruber
Aaron Fever & Sons, Ltd. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, NA, 731 F.2d 112 , 121 (2d Cir.1984); see also Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786 (2d Cir.1980) (applying federal common law choice of law rules but New York State and Venezuelan substantive law to claims and counterclaims in Edge Act case), cert denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Findley v. Blinken (In Re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Litigation)
See, e.g., Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 793 (2d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981); Bank Itec N.V. v. J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rein v. Pan American World Airways Inc.
See, e.g., Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales, 629 F.2d 786 , 793 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981); Aaron Ferer & Sons Ltd. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 731 F.2d 112 (2d Cir. 1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Air Disaster at Lockerbie, Scotland on December 21, 1988. Denice H. Rein v. Pan American World Airways Incorporated, in Re Hijacking of Pan American World Airways, Inc. Aircraft at Karachi International Airport, Pakistan on September 5, 1986. Dilip Joshi, Nadya Hussain, Tahra Lodhi, Dilip Parikh, Faraidoon Oshtory v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
See, e.g., Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales, 629 F.2d 786 , 793 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981); Aaron Ferer & Sons Ltd. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 731 F.2d 112 (2d Cir.1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Barkanic v. General Administration of Civil Aviation of the People's Republic of China
See, e.g., Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 795 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Louise Agnes Barkanic v. General Administration Of Civil Aviation Of The People's Republic Of China
See, e.g., Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 795 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State Trading Corporation of India, Ltd. v. Assuranceforeningen Skuld
Siegelman v. Cunard White Star, Ltd., 221 F.2d 189, 192-93 (2d Cir.1955); see also Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 795 (2d Cir.1980) (Klaxon rule inapplicable in federal question case), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Susan Rosenberg
(2×)
United States v. Cerone, 830 F.2d 938, 944 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 1730 , 100 L.Ed.2d 194 (1988); see Marden, 872 F.2d at 126 (no bar to successive prosecution based on Pinkerton doctrine); United States v. Manzella, 791 F.2d 1263, 1270 (7th Cir.1986) (no bar to retrying defendant for substantive offense on Pinkerton theory following affirmance of conspiracy conviction but reversal of substantive-offense conviction); see also United States v. Wylie, 625 F.2d 1371 , 1382 n. 15 (9th Cir.1980) (dictum), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Villari v. Terminix International, Inc.
See, e.g., Werner v. Upjohn Co., Inc., 628 F.2d 848, 856 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 862 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bross Utilities Service Corp. v. Aboubshait
See, e.g., Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corps., 629 F.2d 786 , 790 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. *1446 1080, 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981); ITT v. Vencap Ltd., 519 F.2d 1001 , 1015 (2d Cir.1975). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Kelley
(Hampton v. United States (1976) 425 U.S. 484, 489-491 [ 48 L.Ed.2d 113, 118-119 , 96 S.Ct. 1646 ]; United States v. Russell (1973) 411 U.S. 423 [ 36 L.Ed.2d 366 , 93 S.Ct. 1637 ]; see also United States v. Wylie (9th Cir. 1980) 625 F.2d 1371, 1377 , cert, den., 449 U.S. 1080 [ 66 L.Ed.2d 804 , 101 S.Ct. 863 ].) Instead, as noted, the California Supreme Court has chosen the objective test to assure the “lawfulness of law enforcement activity.” (People v. Barraza, supra, 23 Cal.3d at pp. 686-691.) Thus federal cases on entrapment such as Sorrells, supra, 287 U.S. 435 , which was the first c…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hassett v. Far West Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n (In Re O.P.M. Leasing Services, Inc.)
See also Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cunard Line Ltd. v. Abney
See also Corporation Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales (2d Cir. 1980) 629 F.2d 786 , 790, cert. denied (1981) 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 ; ITT v. Vencap, Ltd. (2d Cir. 1975) 519 F.2d 1001 , 1015.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Perluss
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 80-684.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 1981.
Cited by 7 opinions | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.