green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.9 score
“non-movant may not simply rely on vague assertions that additional discovery will produce needed, but unspecified facts, ..., particularly where, as here, ample time and opportunities for discovery have already elapsed.”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Marshall v. Quinn-L Equities, Inc.
non-movant may not simply rely on vague assertions that additional discovery will produce needed, but unspecified facts, ..., particularly where, as here, ample time and opportunities for discovery have already elapsed.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Michael A. Barfield v. David Brierton, Louis Carmichael, Richard Dugger, Thomas Barton, David E. Watson, Jerry C. Wade, Randall R. Music, John Shaw
Id. at 901.
discussed
Cited "see"
Nelton v. Farmers Property and Casualty Insurance Company
See Fisher v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 895 F.2d 1073 (5th Cir. 1990) and Netto v. Amtrak, 863 F.2d 1210, 1216 (5th Cir. 1989). 81 10A Wright, Miller, and Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2740 (1983). 82 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Spence & Green Chemical Co., 612 F.2d 896, 901 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1082 , 101 S.Ct. 866 , 66 L.Ed.2d 806 (1981) (quoting Willmar Poultry Co. v. Morton–Norwich Products, Inc., 520 F.2d 289, 297 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 915 , 96 S.Ct. 1116 , 47 L.Ed.2d 320 (1976)). 83 Gossett v. Du–Ra–Kel Corp., 569 F.2d …
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Infinity Group Co.
See SEC v. Spence & Green Chemical Co., 612 F.2d 896, 901 (5th Cir.1980), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 1082 , 101 S.Ct. 866 , 66 L.Ed.2d 806 (1981); SEC v. Continental Tobacco Co., 463 F.2d 137, 155 (5th Cir.1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Graystone Nash, Inc.
See SEC v. Spence & Green Chemical Co., 612 F.2d 896, 901 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1082 , 101 S.Ct. 866 , 66 L.Ed.2d 806 (1981); SEC v. Continental Tobacco Co., 463 F.2d 137, 155 (5th Cir.1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Merrill Farms Corp. v. H.R. Hindle & Co., Inc. (In Re H.R. Hindle & Co.)
See SEC v. Spence & Green Chemical Co., 612 F.2d 896 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1082 , 101 S.Ct. 866 , 66 L.Ed.2d 806 (1981). 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
Allen Greenberg v. Food and Drug Administration
(2×)
The burden under Rule 56(f) requires that 44 [a] party invoking its protections must do so in good faith by affirmatively demonstrating why he cannot respond to a movant's affidavits as otherwise required by Rule 56(e) and how postponement of a ruling on the motion will enable him, by discovery or other means, to rebut the movant's showing of the absence of a genuine issue of fact. 45 Willmar Poultry, 520 F.2d at 297 ; accord SEC v. Spence & Green Chemical Co., 612 F.2d 896, 901 (5th Cir.1980) ("one must conclusively justify his entitlement to the shelter of rule 56(f) by presenting specific f…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Demjanjuk
See United States v. Fedorenko, 455 F.Supp. 893, 900 (S.D.Fla.1978), rev’d 597 F.2d 946 (5th Cir. 1979), aff'd on other grounds 449 U.S. 490 , 101 S.Ct. 737 , 66 L.Ed.2d 806 (1981). [henceforth, Fedorenko ].
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Lipsmeyer Construction Co.
Id.; see also S.E.C. v. Spence & Green Chemical Co., 612 F.2d 896, 901 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1082 , 101 S.Ct. 866 , 66 L.Ed.2d 806 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Security Pacific Mortgage & Real Estate Services, Inc. v. Canadian Land Co. of America, N.V.
See, e.g., SEC v. Spence & Green Chemical Co., 612 F.2d 896, 901 (5th Cir.1980) (“nonmovant may not simply rely on vague assertions that additional discovery will produce needed, but unspecified facts” (citations omitted), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1082 , 101 S.Ct. 866 , 66 L.Ed.2d 806 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
SECURITY PACIFIC MORTG. & R. EST. v. Canadian Land
See, e.g., SEC v. Spence & Green Chemical Co., 612 F.2d 896, 901 (5th Cir.1980) ("nonmovant may not simply rely on vague assertions that additional discovery will produce needed, but unspecified facts" (citations omitted), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1082 , 101 S.Ct. 866 , 66 L.Ed.2d 806 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Korf v. Ball State University
See also S.E.C. v. Spence & Green Chemical Co., 612 F.2d 896 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1082 , 101 S.Ct. 866 , 66 L.Ed.2d 806 (1981); Wallace v. Brownell Pontiac-GMC Co., Inc., 703 F.2d at 527 ; Federal Practice and Procedure Sec. 2740 at 530. 43 In his affidavit to the district court, Dr. Korf alleged that due to his lack of time to conduct discovery he was unable to set forth any specific facts to demonstrate that genuine issues for trial existed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Korf v. Ball State University
See also S.E.C. v. Spence & Green Chemical Co., 612 F.2d 896 (5th Cir.1980), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 1082 , 101 S.Ct. 866 , 66 L.Ed.2d 806 (1981); Wallace v. Brownell Pontiac-GMC Co., Inc., 703 F.2d at 527 ; Federal Practice and Procedure § 2740 at 530.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McCutcheon
v.
Board of Education of Chicago
v.
Board of Education of Chicago
No. 80-724.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 1981.
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.