green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
10.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1990 ·
…blind reliance upon market share, divorced from commercial reality, give a misleading picture of a firm's actual ability to control prices or exclude competition.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
H. Floyd McGahee v. Northern Propane Gas Company
Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery & Chemical Corp., 382 U.S. 172, 177 , 86 S.Ct. 347, 350 , 15 L.Ed.2d 247 (1965) (dicta); Multiflex, Inc. v. Samuel Moore & Co., 709 F.2d 980, 982 (5th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1100 , 104 S.Ct. 1594 , 80 L.Ed.2d 126 (1984); Volasco Products Co. v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co., 308 F.2d 383, 390 (5th Cir.1962) (failure to determine defendant’s market share warranted withdrawal of charge from jury), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 907 , 83 S.Ct. 721 , 9 L.Ed.2d 717 (1963); e.g., Quality Foods v. Latin American Business Development Corp., 711 F.2d 98…
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Robert's Hawaii School Bus, Inc. v. Laupahoehoe Transportation Co.
blind reliance upon market share, divorced from commercial reality, give a misleading picture of a firm's actual ability to control 257 prices or exclude competition.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Syufy Enterprises Raymond J. Syufy
(2×)
blind reliance upon market share, divorced from commercial reality, give a misleading picture of a firm's actual ability to control prices or exclude competition.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
A. H. Cox & Co. v. Star Machinery Co.
Maj.op. at 1308; Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc. v. Ragu Foods, Inc., 627 F.2d 919, 924-26 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 921 , 101 S.ct. 1369, 67 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Food Lion, LLC v. Dean Foods Co.
See Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc. v. Ragu Foods, Inc., 627 F.2d 919, 926-27 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 1369 , 67 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981). “[T]he mere intention to exclude competition and to expand one’s own business is not sufficient to show a specific intent to monopolize” because “[a]ll lawful competition aims to defeat and drive out competitors.” Great Escape, Inc. v. Union City Body Co., Inc., 791 F.2d 532, 541 (7th Cir.1986) (citing Pacific Eng’g & Prod.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Southeastern Milk Antitrust Litigation
See Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc. v. Ragu Foods, Inc., 627 F.2d 919, 926-27 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 1369 , 67 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981). "[T]he mere intention to exclude competition and to expand one's own business is not sufficient to show a specific intent to monopolize" because "[a]ll lawful competition aims to defeat and drive out competitors." Great Escape, Inc. v. Union City Body Co., Inc., 791 F.2d 532, 541 (7th Cir.1986) (citing Pacific Eng'g & Prod.
cited
Cited "see"
Re/Max International v. Realty One, Inc.
See Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc. v. Ragu Foods, Inc., 627 F.2d 919, 926-27 (9th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 450 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 1369 , 67 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Los Angeles Land Co. Sierra Palm Partners West Lanes Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation
See id. ¶ 813 at 301.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gilberto Pineda-Ortuno and Carlos Ramirez-Carranza
See United States v. Gerald, 624 F.2d 1291, 1299 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 1369 , 67 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. North American Industries of New York, Inc.
See Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc. v. Ragu Foods, Inc., 627 F.2d 919 (9th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 450 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 1369 , 67 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Perfumer's Workshop, Ltd. v. Roure Bertrand Du Pont, Inc.
See Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc. v. Ragu Foods, Inc., 627 F.2d 919 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 1369 , 67 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981) (antitrust claims are comprised of three elements: (1) possession of a monopoly in the relevant market; (2) willful maintenance of power over the product; and (3) causal antitrust injury); United States v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 351 U.S. 377, 380 , 76 S.Ct. 994, 998-99 , 100 L.Ed. 1264 (1956).
cited
Cited "see"
Charles E. Beard, Inc. v. Cameronics Technology Corp.
See Two Rivers Co. v. Curtiss Breeding Service, 624 F.2d 1242, 1251-52 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 1368 , 67 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Oahu Gas Service, Inc. v. Pacific Resources Inc., Gasco, Inc.
See Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc. v. Ragu Foods, Inc., 627 F.2d 919, 925 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 1369 , 67 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Don Stovall and Robert Harlon \Frosty\" Winter"
See United States v. Gerald, 624 F.2d 1291, 1300 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 1369 , 67 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Don L. Hart
See United States v. Gerald, 624 F.2d 1291 , 1295-96 & n. 1 (5th Cir.1980), (objection to voir dire of veniremen will not be considered where defendant has failed to have it included in the record), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 1369 , 67 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981); United States v. Brewer, 630 F.2d 795, 803 (10th Cir.1980) (no occasion to determine merits of defendant’s challenge to affidavit on which issuance of warrant based where affidavit not included in record); United States v. Strand, 617 F.2d 571, 578 (10th Cir.), (defendant’s challenge to sufficiency of evidence will not be cons…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bruce Graziano, Sam Ward, United States of America v. Bruce Graziano
See United States v. Gerald, 624 F.2d 1291, 1300 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 1369 , 67 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981). 10 .
cited
Cited "see"
Northrop Corp. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.
See Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc. v. Ragu Foods, Inc., 627 F.2d 919, 925 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 1369 , 67 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Laurence J. Gordon, Inc. v. Brandt, Inc.
See Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc. v. Ragu Foods, Inc., 627 F.2d 919, 924 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 1369 , 67 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981).
examined
Cited "see"
Preston B. Purvis v. Consolidated Energy Products Company, a Division of Condec Corporation
(6×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Two Rivers Co. v. Curtiss Breeding Service, 624 F.2d 1242, 1249 (5 Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 1368 , 67 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981); Young v. Tide Craft, Inc., 270 S.C. 453 , 242 S.E.2d 671, 679-80 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Forro Precision, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.
See Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc. v. Ragu Foods, Inc., 627 F.2d 919, 924-25 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. *1059 1369, 67 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Jay Elsoffer
See *1297 United States v. Gerald, 624 F.2d 1291, 1299 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 1369 , 67 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cook
See 450 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 1368 , 67 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981). .
discussed
Cited "see"
William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc., William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc.
(2×)
See Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc. v. Ragu Foods, Inc., 627 F.2d 919, 925-26 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 1369 , 67 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981); California Computer Prods, v. IBM, 613 F.2d 727, 743 (9th Cir. 1979); Janich, supra, 570 F.2d at 857 ; Greyhound Computer Corp. v. IBM, 559 F.2d 488, 505 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1040 , 98 S.Ct. 782 , 54 L.Ed.2d 790 (1978); Twin City Sportservice, Inc. v. Charles O.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brooks Fiber Communications of Tucson, Inc. v. GST Tucson Lightwave, Inc.
See also Syufy, 793 F.2d at 1000 . “[N]o particular level of market power or ‘dangerous probability of success’ has to be alleged or proved in a conspiracy [to monopolize] claim where the specific intent to monopolize is otherwise apparent from the character of the actions taken.” Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc. v. Ragu Foods, Inc., 627 F.2d 919, 926 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 1369 , 67 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Phoenix Electric Co. v. National Electrical Contractors Ass'n
See, e.g., Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc. v. Ragu Foods, Inc., 627 F.2d 919, 926 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 921 , 101 5.Ct. 1369, 67 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981); Christofferson Dairy, Inc. v. MMM Sales, Inc., 849 F.2d 1168, 1174 (9th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Phoenix Electric Co. v. National Electrical Contractors Ass'n
See, e.g., Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc. v. Ragu Foods, Inc., 627 F.2d 919, 926 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 1369 , 67 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981); Christofferson Dairy, Inc. v. MMM Sales, Inc., 849 F.2d 1168, 1174 (9th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joyce Lisa Cummings v. Richard L. Dugger and Robert A. Butterworth
United States v. Tegzes, 715 F.2d 505, 507 (11th Cir.1983); United States v. Holman, 680 F.2d 1340, 1344 (11th Cir.1982); see also United States v. Gerald, 624 F.2d 1291, 1296 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 1369 , 67 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981) (noting that Fed.R.Crim.P. 24(a) has been interpreted to give trial court broad discretion in deciding method of jury voir dire).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jo Ann Harrelson, Charles Voyed Harrelson and Elizabeth Nichols Chagra
See also United States v. Gerald, 624 F.2d 1291, 1296 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 1369 , 67 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Phillips
See, e.g., United States v. Gerald, 624 F.2d 1291, 1299 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 1369 , 67 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981); United States v. Rosa, 560 F.2d 149 , 154 n. 5 (3d Cir.1977) (en banc), cert. denied sub nom.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Zoslaw v. MCA Distributing Corp.
See also Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc. v. Ragu Foods, Inc., 627 F.2d 919, 936 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 1369 , 67 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles Zoslaw v. Mca Distributing Corporation
See also Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc. v. Ragu Foods, Inc., 627 F.2d 919, 936 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 1369 , 67 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jamiel Alexander Chagra
See also United States v. Gerald, 624 F.2d 1291, 1296 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 1369 , 67 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Holmes
v.
District of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review
v.
District of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review
No. 80-1081.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 23, 1981.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2) · Hawaii Supreme Court (1)
Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.