green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Price v. Jefferson County
See Rheuark v. Shaw, 628 F.2d 297, 305 (5th Cir.1980), cert, denied, 450 U.S. 931 , 101 S.Ct. 1392 , 67 L.Ed.2d 365 (1981) (holding that “[i]n order for a governmental unit to be liable under § 1983, the policy or custom must ..., by the very terms of the statute, be a proximate cause of the constitutional violation”); accord Fiuffman v. County of Los Angeles, 147 F.3d 1054, 1059 (9th Cir. 1998), cert, denied, 526 U.S. 1038 , 119 S.Ct. 1333 , 143 L.Ed.2d 498 (1999); Trevino v. Gates, 99 F.3d 911 , 918 (9th Cir.1996), cert, denied, 520 U.S. 1117 , 117 S.Ct. 1249 , 137 L.Ed.2d 330 (1997); K…
discussed
Cited "see"
Price v. Jefferson County
See Rheuark v. Shaw, 628 F.2d 297, 305 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 931 , 101 S.Ct. 1392 , 67 L.Ed.2d 365 (1981) (holding that "[i]n order for a governmental unit to be liable under § 1983, the policy or custom must . . ., by the very terms of the statute, be a proximate cause of the constitutional violation"); accord Huffman v. County of Los Angeles, 147 F.3d 1054, 1059 (9th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1038 , 119 S.Ct. 1333 , 143 L.Ed.2d 498 (1999); Trevino v. *693 Gates, 99 F.3d 911, 918 (9th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1117 , 117 S.Ct. 1249 , 137 L.Ed.2d 330 (1997); …
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Harper
See Rheuark v. Shaw, 628 F.2d 297, 302 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 931 , 101 S.Ct. 1392 , 67 L.Ed.2d 365 (1981) (assuming without deciding that delay of nearly two years violates due process); Layne, 559 F.2d at 851 (delay of over three years constitutes due process violation).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bermea
See id. (assuming without deciding that a delay of almost two years between the filing of a notice of appeal and the state's preparation of the appellate record exceeds the limits of due process).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bermea
See id. (assuming without deciding that a delay of almost two years between the filing of a notice of appeal and the state’s preparation of the appellate record exceeds the limits of due process).
discussed
Cited "see"
Arebaugh v. Dalton
See Rheuark v. Shaw, 628 F.2d 297, 303 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 931 , 101 S.Ct. 1392 , 67 L.Ed.2d 365 (1980) (trial judge’s two year delay in issuing an order to prepare a trial transcript necessary for plaintiff to pursue his appeal is protected by absolute immunity). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Alton Johnson
See Rheuark v. Shaw, 628 F.2d 297, 302-3 (5 Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 931 , 101 S.Ct. 1392 , 67 L.Ed.2d 365 (1981) (action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by criminal defendants against state judge, court reporter, and other officials based on undue delay in preparing transcript for purposes of appeal of criminal defendants’ trial); Layne v. Gunter, 559 F.2d 850, 851 (1 Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1038 , 98 S.Ct. 776 , 54 L.Ed.2d 787 (1978) (inordinate delay in the adjudication of a post-conviction remedy may work a denial of due process cognizable in federal habeas corpus); Smith v. K…
discussed
Cited "see"
Barrie Deon Shelton v. Jack B. Heard
See Rheuark v. Shaw, 628 F.2d 297 (5th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 450 U.S. 931 , 101 S.Ct. 1392 , 67 L.Ed.2d 365 (1981) (delay of nearly two years from notice of appeal to the date a statement of facts was prepared by court reporter for prisoner’s appeal violates due process); Reynolds v. Wainwright, 460 F.2d 1026 (5th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 950 , 93 S.Ct. 294 , 34 L.Ed.2d 221 (1972) (an “inordinate delay” in State post-conviction process may render the State remedy ineffective); St.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jeannie Coutta v. State
See Phynes v. State, 828 S.W.2d 1, 2 (Tex.Crim.App.1992); see also Rheuark v. Shaw, 628 F.2d 297, 302 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 931 , 101 S.Ct. 1392 , 67 L.Ed.2d 365 (1981); Sparkman v. State, 634 S.W.2d 82, 84 (Tex.App.-Tyler 1982, no pet.).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Callis v. Sellars
Once an official policy or custom is identified, as a condition precedent for local government liability, there must be a causal relationship between that policy or custom and the plaintiff’s constitutional deprivation. 1 Nahmod, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Litigation: The Law of Section 1983 § 6.07, at 423; see also Rheuark v. Shaw, 628 F.2d 297 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 931 , 101 S.Ct. 1392 , 67 L.Ed.2d 365 (1981) (county's official policy of attempting to curtail court reporter budget was not a cause in fact of the delay in preparing plaintiff’s statement of fact for …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Steven Anthony Heiser v. Warden Joseph Ryan
(2×)
See Burkett v. Cunningham, 826 F.2d 1208, 1222 (3d Cir.1987) (Burkett I); see also Rheuark v. Shaw, 628 F.2d 297, 303 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 931 , 101 S.Ct. 1392 , 67 L.Ed.2d 365 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Blackwell v. Cook
See, e.g., Rheuark v. Shaw, 628 F.2d 297 (5th Cir.1980) cert. denied, 450 U.S. 931 , 101 S.Ct. 1392 , 67 L.Ed.2d 365 (1981) (a judge’s supervision of a court clerk is a judicial function).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rohl
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 80-5968.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 23, 1981.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.