green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
10.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1986 ·
…an eis is not required, however, when the proposed federal action will effect no change in the status quo
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 37 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Kent Thomas L'ALLier
improper joinder under rule 8 requires mandatory severance.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Manasota-88, Inc. v. Thomas
an eis is not required, however, when the proposed federal action will effect no change in the status quo
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Manasota-88, Inc. v. Thomas
an eis is not required, however, when the proposed federal action will effect no change in the status quo
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Andrews
See United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184, 1200 (7th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Merrill v. Chicago & Illinois Midland Railway
See Odom Construction Co. v. United States Department of Labor, 622 F.2d 110 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 966 , 101 S.Ct. 1482 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Oliver Hocking
See United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184, 1193 (7th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); Boulahanis, 677 F.2d at 589-90 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Albert Taylor, United States of America v. Antonio Nigo-Martinez and Salvador Jaraba, United States of America v. Paul Clemenic, United States of America v. Jerald Wilson, United States of America v. Jerry Rosenstein and Donald Sanders
(2×)
See United States v. Armored Transport, Inc., 629 F.2d 1313, 1316 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); United States v. Macklin, 523 F.2d 193, 195 (2d Cir.1975); United States v. Fein, 504 F.2d 1170, 1173 (2d Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Taylor
(2×)
See United States v. Armored Transport, Inc., 629 F.2d 1313, 1316 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); United States v. Macklin, 523 F.2d 193, 195 (2d Cir.1975); United States v. Fein, 504 F.2d 1170, 1173 (2d Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony J. Peters, Lawrence Peters, and Jacek Odoner
(2×)
See United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184, 1200 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); United States v. Shue, 766 F.2d 1122, 1135 (7th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fitapelli
See, United States v. Armored Transport Inc., 629 F.2d 1313, 1318-19 (9th Cir.1980) cert. denied 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981) (upholding conviction by construing defective indictment as an information).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fitapelli
See, United States v. Armored Transport Inc., 629 F.2d 1313, 1318-19 (9th Cir.1980) cert. denied 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981) (upholding conviction by construing defective indictment as an information).
discussed
Cited "see"
Melissa Johnson, an Infant by Barbara Johnson, Her Mother and Natural Guardian and Barbara Johnson, Individually v. United States
(2×)
See Emch v. United States, 630 F.2d 523, 528 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 966 , 101 S.Ct. 1482 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); Gaudet v. United States, 517 F.2d 1034 (5th Cir.1975); Coffey v. United States, 387 F.Supp. 539, 540 (D.Conn.1975) (quoting Nichols v. United States, 236 F.Supp. 260, 263 (N.D.Miss.1964)). 32 The plaintiffs here only offered a conclusory allegation that "the defendant, its agents, servants and employees assigned Ojeda to the area ... with notice or knowledge of Ojeda's criminal and perverted propensities and tendencies ..." and provided no factual basis for this con…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ira Paul Citron
See United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184, 1196 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fischbach & Moore, Inc.
See United States v. Armored Transport, 629 F.2d 1313, 1317 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); United States v. Campanale, 518 F.2d 352 , 359-60 n. 17 (9th Cir.1975) (“grand jury convened and sitting in the Central District of California”), ce rt. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 777 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fischbach And Moore, Inc.
See United States v. Armored Transport, 629 F.2d 1313, 1317 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); United States v. Campanale, 518 F.2d 352 , 359-60 n. 17 (9th Cir.1975) ("grand jury convened and sitting in the Central District of California"), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 777 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Moreno L. Keplinger, Paul L. Wright, and James B. Plank
See United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Marrapese
See United States v. Armored Transport, Inc., 629 F.2d 1313, 1316-17 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bell v. State
See United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184, 1198 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); United States v. Medical Therapy Sciences, Inc., 583 F.2d 36, 39-40 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1130 , 99 S.Ct. 1049 , 59 L.Ed.2d 91 (1979); Sneed v. State, 397 So.2d 931, 933 (Fla. 5 D.C.A. 1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Norman Z. Flick and Lowell G. Maynard, United States of America v. Norman Z. Flick and Lowell G. Maynard
See United States v. Hedman, 680 F.2d 1184, 1200 (7th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph M. Margiotta
(2×)
See United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184 , 1194 n.4 (7th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bauer Welding and Metal Fabricators, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
(2×)
See South Shore Hospital v. NLRB, 630 F.2d 40, 44 (1st Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); Neon Sign Corp. v. NLRB, 602 F.2d 1203, 1204-05 (5th Cir. 1979); NLRB v. Amoco Chemicals Corp., 529 F.2d 427, 432-33 (5th Cir. 1976); NLRB v. Dent, 534 F.2d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dannhausen v. First Nat. Bank of Sturgeon Bay
(2×)
See Emch v. United States, 474 F.Supp. 99 (E.D.Wis.1979), aff’d, 630 F.2d 523 (7th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 966 , 101 S.Ct. 1482 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Osborne
See United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184 (7th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); United States v. Warner, 441 F.2d 821 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 829 , 92 S.Ct. 65 , 30 L.Ed.2d 58 (1971); United States v. Varelli, 407 F.2d 735 (7th Cir. 1969).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Thompson
See, e.g., United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184, 1196 (7th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The Wilderness Society v. Babbitt
If it had, it would have needed to explain our decisions in which we have held that the government need not prepare an EIS for ongoing programs unless they "rise to the level of major federal actions...." Upper Snake River Chapter of Trout Unlimited v. Hodel, 921 F.2d 232 , 235 n. 3 (9th Cir.1990) (periodic adjustments of water flow are part of ongoing operation of dam); see also Burbank Anti-Noise Group v. Goldschmidt, 623 F.2d 115, 116 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981) (holding that an EIS is not required when "the proposed federal action wil…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilderness Society v. Babbitt
If it had, it would have needed to explain our decisions in which we have held that the government need not prepare an EIS for ongoing programs unless they “rise to the level of major federal actions .... ” Upper Snake River Chapter of Trout Unlimited v. Hodel, 921 F.2d 232 , 236 n. 3 (9th Cir.1990) (periodic adjustments of water flow are part of ongoing operation of dam); see also Burbank Anti-Noise Group v. Goldschmidt, 623 F.2d 115, 116 (9th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981) (holding that an EIS is not required when “the proposed federal a…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sims
See also United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184, 1200 (7th Cir.1980) (rejecting defendant's claim that since he was charged in only two of the nineteen counts in the indictment, he was prejudiced by the disparity of the evidence against him and the evidence against his co-defendants), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schlup v. Auburn Needleworks, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Odom Const. Co. v. U. S. Dept. of Labor, 622 F.2d 110 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied 450 U.S. 966 , 101 S. Ct. 1482 , 67 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Environmental Rights Coalition, Inc. v. Austin
See, e.g., Burbank Anti-Noise Group v. Goldschmidt, 623 F.2d 115, 116 (9th Cir.1980) (“the actions here can be undone"), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); Silva, 473 F.2d at 290 (”[t]he nexus here ... is so extensive”). 18 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Irwin
See also Emch v. United States, 630 F.2d 523, 528 (7th Cir.1980) (allegations of “numerous ‘mistakes, errors, and omissions in the course of examining’ the bank and its holding company ... fall facially within the exception”), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 966 , 101 S.Ct. 1482 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. William K. Irwin, Shirley N. Irwin, and Glynn Bell, Defendants-Third Party and McLean American Bancshares, Inc., Third-Party v. United States of America, Third-Party
See also Emch v. United States, 630 F.2d 523, 528 (7th Cir.1980) (allegations of "numerous 'mistakes, errors, and omissions in the course of examining' the bank and its holding company ... fall facially within the exception"), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 966 , 101 S.Ct. 1482 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981). 18 "Federal examination of national banks was designed to provide the Comptroller with information necessary to perform his regulatory function" Harmsen v. Smith, 586 F.2d 156, 157 (9th Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tomas Perez and Raul Ramirez
See, e.g., United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184, 1201 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); United States v. Gonzales, 765 F.2d 1393, 1396 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1068 , 106 S.Ct. 826 , 88 L.Ed.2d 798 *1275 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Local 560 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, and Helpers of America, Salvatore Provenzano, President, Joseph Sheridan, Vice-President, Josephine Provenzano Septembre, Sec-Treasurer, J.W. Dildine, Recording Secretary, Thomas Reynolds, Sr., Trustee, Stanley Jaronko, Trustee, Trucking Employees of North Jersey Welfare Fund, Inc., Salvatore Provenzano, Employee Trustee, Thomas Reynolds, Sr., Employee Trustee, Local 560 Officers and Employees Severance Pay Plan, Salvatore Provenzano, Trustee and Administrator, Josephine P. Septembre, Trustee and Administrator, Anthony Provenzano, Individually, Nunzio Provenzano, Individually, Stephen Andretta, Individually, Thomas Andretta, Individually, Gabriel Briguglio, Individually. United States of America v. Local 560 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, and Helpers of America, Salvatore Provenzano, President, Joseph Sheridan, Vice-President, Josephine Provenzano Septembre, Sec-Treasurer, J.W. Dildine, Recording Secretary, Thomas Reynolds, Sr., Trustee, Stanley Jaronko, Trustee, Trucking Employees of North Jersey Welfare Fund, Inc., Salvatore Provenzano, Employee Trustee, Thomas Reynolds, Sr., Employee Trustee, Local 560 Officers and Employees Severance Pay Plan, Salvatore Provenzano, Trustee and Administrator, Josephine P. Septembre, Trustee and Administrator, Anthony Provenzano, Individually, Nunzio Provenzano, Individually, Stephen Andretta, Individually, Thomas Andretta, Individually, Gabriel Briguglio, Individually. Appeal of Local Union No. 560, Appeal of Salvatore Provenzano, Joseph Sheridan, Jay Dildine, Josephine Provenzano, Thomas Reynolds, Michael Sciarra and Stanley Jaronko
See, e.g., United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184, 1194 (7th Cir.1980) (extortion found although victim "happy" to make payments and relations between victim and extorters was "cordial"), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); United States v. Sander, 615 F.2d 215 (5th Cir.) (Hobbs Act covers fear of economic loss and "subtle extortions"; government need not show that fear was direct consequence of threat or that victim personally feared extorter), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 835 , 101 S.Ct. 108 , 66 L.Ed.2d 41 (1980). 67 Here, of course, the extortion of rights which …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Local 560 of International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, & Helpers of America
See, e.g., United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184, 1194 (7th Cir.1980) (extortion found although victim “happy” to make payments and relations between victim and extorters was “cordial”), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); United States v. Sander, 615 F.2d 215 (5th Cir.) (Hobbs Act covers fear of economic loss and “subtle extortions”; government need not show that fear was direct consequence of threat or that victim personally feared extorter), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 835 , 101 S.Ct. 108 , 66 L.Ed.2d 41 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Henry Paul Bryant, A/K/A Paul Bryant and Melissa J. Dalton
As the Third Circuit has stated: A violation of the statute [ 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (b)(2) ] may be made out by showing that a public official through the wrongful use of office obtains property not due him or his office, even though his acts are not accompanied by the use of “force, violence or fear.” United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 594 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982), quoting United States v. Mazzei, 521 F.2d 639, 645 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1014 , 96 S.Ct. 446 , 46 L.Ed.2d 385 (1975); see also United States v. Hed…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles Shue
See United States v. Rodgers, 732 F.2d 625, 628 (8th Cir.1984); United States v. Werner, 620 F.2d 922, 926 (2d Cir.1980); see also United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184, 1200 (7th Cir.1980) (“Improper joinder under Rule 8 requires mandatory severance.”), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hyman Schmidt, Marvin Gene Grulke, Chester Folak
See, e.g., United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); United States v. Price, 617 F.2d 455, 457 (7th Cir.1979); United States v. Braasch, 505 F.2d 139, 151 (7th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 910 , 95 S.Ct. 1561 , 43 L.Ed.2d 775 (1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Armored Transport, Inc.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 80-948.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 2, 1981.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (2) · Seventh Circuit (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.