green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Polk County v. Dodson
Indeed, an indispensable element of the effective performance of his responsibilities is the ability to act independently of the Government and to oppose it in adversary litigation." [9] Although lawyers are generally licensed by the States, "they are not officials of government by virtue of being lawyers." In re Griffiths, 413 U. S. 717, 729 (1973). [10] See 628 F. 2d, at 1110. [11] This rule has been adopted verbatim as DR 5-107(B), Iowa Code of Professional Responsibility for Lawyers, printed in Iowa Rules of Court 526 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
LeCompte v. State
(2×)
See Hunter v. State, Del.Supr., 420 A.2d 119 (1980), vacated and remanded, 450 U.S. 991 , 101 S.Ct. 1689 , 68 L.Ed.2d 190 (1981), rev’d on remand, Del.Supr., 430 A.2d 476 (1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 971 , 102 S.Ct. 519 , 1570 L.Ed.2d 390 (1981); Evans v. State, Del.Supr., 420 A.2d 1186 (1980), vacated and remanded, 450 U.S. 991 , 101 S.Ct. 1689 , 68 L.Ed.2d 190 (1981), rev’d on remand, Del.Supr., 430 A.2d 481 (1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 972 , 102 S.Ct. 521 , 70 L.Ed.2d 391 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Damon v. State
See, Delaware v. Hunter, 450 U.S. ___ , 101 S.Ct. 1689 , 68 L.Ed.2d 190 (1981); Delaware v. Evans, 450 U.S. ___ , 101 S.Ct. 1689 , 68 L.Ed.2d 190 (1981); and Missouri v. Counselman, 450 U.S. ___ , 101 S.Ct. 1690 , 68 L.Ed.2d 190 (1981) (vacating Pinder -like state decisions for further consideration in light of Albernaz. ) [10] The defendants specifically do not rely on the result in Mahaun v. State, supra, at 377 So.2d 1161 , in which, in considering the reverse situation of the one before us, the supreme court held that an acquittal of the underlying felony "effectively holds [the defendant]…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kissinger
v.
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
v.
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
No. 78-1088.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 23, 1981.
Consideration, Motion, Took.
Published
445 U. S. 136. ' Motion of Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press for clarification of the judgment denied.
Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.