Davis v. Warden, 450 U.S. 1002 (1981). · Go Syfert
Search
Davis v. Warden, 450 U.S. 1002 (1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
65 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Richard Y. Kim and Young N. Kim (ca5, 1989-09-11)
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Richard Y. Kim and Young N. Kim
5th Cir. · 1989 · confidence medium
Id. at 244.
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Harvey I. Silverman
11th Cir. · 1984 · confidence medium
Id. at 244-45; United States v. Wayman, 510 F.2d 1020, 1027 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 846 , 96 S.Ct. 84 , 46 L.Ed.2d 67 (1975).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) McCleskey v. Zant (2×)
N.D. Ga. · 1984 · confidence medium
As the court observed in United States v. Barham, 595 F.2d 231 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1002 , 101 S.Ct. 1711 , 68 L.Ed.2d 205 , the defendant is “entitled to a jury that, before deciding which story to credit, was truthfully apprised of any possible interest of any Government witness in testifying falsely.” Id. at 243 (emphasis in original).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Richard George Mathews, A/K/A Ricky George Williams, Sharon Elaine Carter
11th Cir. · 1993 · signal: accord · confidence high
See United States v. Metz, 608 F.2d 147, 156 (5th Cir.1979) (defendant who had been convicted and sentenced in federal court retained right not to incriminate himself where testimony could lead to prosecution in state court), cert. denied, *851 449 U.S. 821 , 101 S.Ct. 80 , 66 L.Ed.2d 24 (1980); accord United States v. Barham, 625 F.2d 1221, 1225 (5th Cir.1980) (one who has been convicted of possessing, distributing and conspiring to make, possess and distribute counterfeit money but who has not been charged with receiving counterfeit money cannot be compelled to testify regarding the source o…
discussed Cited "see" Prince v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Barham , 625 F.2d 1221 , 1223-24 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1002 , 101 S.Ct. 1711 , 68 L.Ed.2d 205 (1981). "[T]he decision in the prior appeal is the law of the case." Glasscock v. Wallace , 488 So.2d 1346 , 1348 (Ala. 1986).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Raymond Stephenson and Marty Taylor
11th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Barham, 595 F.2d 231, 245 (5th Cir.1979), aff’d after remand, 625 F.2d 1221 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1002 , 101 S.Ct. 1711 , 68 L.Ed.2d 205 (1981). *582 Finally, we disagree with Taylor that the trial court’s refusal to sever under Rule 14 was an abuse of discretion.
discussed Cited "see" Thomas Eldridge Barrett v. Commonwealth of Virginia Arlington Circuit Court
4th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Imam Ali Abdullah Akbar v. Canney, 634 F.2d 339 (6 Cir. 1980) (per curiam), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1002 , 101 S.Ct. 1712 , 68 L.Ed.2d 205 (1981); Smalley v. Bell, 484 F.Supp. 16 (W.D.Okl.1979); Masjid Muhammad — D.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Gary Lynn Weaver
6th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
See In re Young, 716 F.2d 493, 500 (8th Cir.1983) (holding unacceptable an FBI affidavit of “broad, boilerplate statement describing in a general way” applications, reports, and records commonly kept in bail bond operation); see also United States v. Barham, 595 F.2d 231, 246 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1002 , 101 S.Ct. 1711 , 68 L.Ed.2d 205 (1981) (characterizing sufficient affidavit as “honest and straightforward recitation (unadorned by the boilerplate so frequently and woodenly inserted to satisfy Fourth Amendment standards in the most artificial fashion)”); contra Unite…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Melvin Lee Phillips, Sr.
5th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Barham, 595 F.2d 231, 244 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1002 , 101 S.Ct. 1711 , 68 L.Ed.2d 205 (1981); United States v. Ashley, 569 F.2d 975 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 853 , 99 S.Ct. 163 , 58 L.Ed.2d 159 (1978).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jeffrey Linn Hall v. State of Iowa and Attorney General of Iowa
8th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see also · confidence low
See State v. Johnson, 318 N.W.2d 417, 435 (Iowa 1982); see also Lomax v. State, 629 F.2d 413, 415-16 (5th Cir.1980), cert. den., 450 U.S. 1002 , 101 S.Ct. 1712 , 68 L.Ed.2d 205 (1981); cf. Kirby v. Illinois, 406 U.S. at 689 , 92 S.Ct. at 1882 (emphasizes significance of moment when defendant is faced with “prosecutorial forces”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Davis
v.
Warden, Central Prison
No. 80-6088.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 23, 1981.
450 U.S. 1002
Published

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.