Newton v. California, 450 U.S. 1030 (1981). · Go Syfert
Newton v. California, 450 U.S. 1030 (1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“... the underlying state law merely serves a definitional purpose in characterizing the proscribed conduct.”
38 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Milton Teplin (ca4, 1985-10-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Milton Teplin
4th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
... the underlying state law merely serves a definitional purpose in characterizing the proscribed conduct.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Jones
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Loucas, 629 F. 2d 989, 991 (4th Cir.1980), cert. *490 denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1738 , 68 L.Ed. 2d 224 (1981) (state substantive offense is not a prerequisite to a Travel Act conviction); United States v. Pomponio, 511 F. 2d 953, 957 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 874 , 96 S.Ct. 142 , 46 L.Ed. 2d 105 (1975) ("The `unlawful activity' specified in the [Travel] Act may be [an offense] under state or federal law and reference to such law is necessary only to identify the type of `unlawful' activity in which the defendants intended to engage.
discussed Cited "see" Harrison v. United States Postal Service
4th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See George v. Kay, 632 F.2d 1103, 1106 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1029 , 101 S.Ct. 1738 , 68 L.Ed.2d 224 (1981); see also SEC v. Seaboard Corp., 677 F.2d 1315 , 1317 (9th Cir.1982). 8 Harrison was not a Postal Service employee.
discussed Cited "see" Harrison v. United States Postal Service
4th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See George v. Kay, 632 F.2d 1103, 1106 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1029 , 101 S.Ct. 1738 , 68 L.Ed.2d 224 (1981); see also SEC v. Seaboard Corp., 677 F.2d 1315 , 1317 (9th Cir.1982). .Harrison was not a Postal Service employee.
discussed Cited "see" Watts v. Des Moines Register and Tribune
S.D. Iowa · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Clark v. Lomas & Nettleton Finance Corp., 625 F.2d 49, 53 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. den., 450 U.S. 1029 , 101 S.Ct. 1738 , 68 L.Ed.2d 224 (1981); Elfenbein v. Gulf & *1327 Western Indus., 590 F.2d 445, 450 (2d Cir. 1978) (per curiam); Cramer v. GTE Corp., 582 F.2d 259 , 276-277 (3rd Cir. 1978), cert. den., 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1048 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979). (2) Whether Board’s Authority was Properly Delegated.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Thomas M. Gaubert v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board
D.C. Cir. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Clark v. Lomas & Nettleton Financial Corp., 625 F.2d 49, 53 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1029 , 101 S.Ct. 1738 , 68 L.Ed.2d 224 (1981). 6 Gaubert argues that Texas law conforms to this more liberal “acquiescence” stan *66 dard for demand futility.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Anderson v. Thomas
S.D.N.Y. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
Hunting *573 ton Towers, Ltd. v. Franklin National Bank, 559 F.2d 863, 870 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied 434 U.S. 1012 , 98 S.Ct. 726 , 54 L.Ed.2d 756 (1978) (“federal officials are not personally liable for alleged torts based upon acts committed within the scope of their official duties requiring the exercise of judgment or discretion”); Wyler v. United States, 725 F.2d 156, 159 (2d Cir.1983); see also George v. Kay, 632 F.2d 1103,1105 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1029 , 101 S.Ct. 1738 , 68 L.Ed.2d 224 (1981) (federal postal inspector entitled to absolute immunity from common law…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lewis v. Curtis
3rd Cir. · 1982 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Clark v. Lomas & Nettleton Financial Corp., 625 F.2d 49 , 54 n.5 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1029 , 101 S.Ct. 1738 , 68 L.Ed.2d 224 (1980); Galef v. Alexander, 615 F.2d 51, 59 (2d Cir. 1980); Heit, 567 F.2d at 1162 n.4.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lewis v. Curtis
3rd Cir. · 1982 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Clark v. Lomas & Nettleton Financial Corp., 625 F.2d 49 , 54 n.5 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1029 , 101 S.Ct. 1738 , 68 L.Ed.2d 224 (1980); Galef v. Alexander, 615 F.2d 51, 59 (2d Cir. 1980); Heit, 567 F.2d at 1162 n.4.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Wallen v. Domm
E.D. Va. · 1982 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., George v. Kay, 632 F.2d 1103, 1105-06 (4th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1029 , 101 S.Ct. 1738 , 68 L.Ed.2d 224 (1981); Miller v. DeLaune, 602 F.2d 198, 199-200 (9th Cir. 1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Newton
v.
California
No. 80-1024.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 30, 1981.
450 U.S. 1030

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.