green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
11.5 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1992 ·
…erisa "plans" are broader in concept than pure insurance transactions
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1987 ·
…it devolves upon one seeking a suppression of incriminating evidence to establish as a threshold matter the existence of a reasonable expectation of privacy
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1987 ·
…it devolves upon one seeking suppression of incriminating evidence to establish as a threshhold matter the existence of a reasonable expectation of privacy
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Arch Mineral Corporation v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor
But see Selco Supply Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 632 F.2d 863, 865 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1740 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981); Nocon v. INS, 789 F.2d 1028, 1032-33 (3d Cir.1986); Nappi v. Commissioner, 58 T.C. 282, 283-84 (1972); Consolidated Flower Shipments, Inc.— Bay Area v. C.A.B., 205 F.2d 449, 451 (9th Cir.1953), overruled by, Franklin, 290 F.2d at 719 .
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Nechero v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance
(2×)
erisa "plans" are broader in concept than pure insurance transactions
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Gehena
(2×)
it devolves upon one seeking suppression of incriminating evidence to establish as a threshhold matter the existence of a reasonable expectation of privacy
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Gerena
(2×)
it devolves upon one seeking a suppression of incriminating evidence to establish as a threshold matter the existence of a reasonable expectation of privacy
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Gerena
(2×)
it devolves upon one seeking suppression of incriminating evidence to establish as a threshhold matter the existence of a reasonable expectation of privacy in the area searched
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Oreste Kidder and Thelma Kidder v. H & B Marine, Inc.
In Taggart Corp. v. Life and Health Benefits Admin., Inc., 617 F.2d 1208, 1211 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 5.Ct. 1739, 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1980), we held that an employer’s “bare purchase” of an insurance policy does not establish an ERISA plan.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Thomas Manbeck, United States of America v. Kenneth Herring, United States of America v. Mark Huiet Sale, United States of America v. Lorenz Josephus Proden, United States of America v. Kermit Theodore Brogden, United States of America v. John Wesley Flannel, United States of America v. Gary Gallopo, United States of America v. John Benjamin Barton, Jr., Jessie Lee Mallory, and Arthur Duncan, United States of America v. John O'hare, Eddie Brantley, Thomas Earnest Folske, Thomas Sams Hightower, Timothy Allen Laxton, Harrell Lewis, Jr., and John Isidore Stevens, United States of America v. Aaron Douglas Staetter, John Michael Iyoob, James Anthony Hastings, and Gregory Michael Scott, United States of America v. David Martin Summerville
See Florida v. Royer, 103 S.Ct. at 1325-1326 ; Michigan v. Summers, 452 U.S. at 700, 101 S.Ct. at 2593 (1981); Dunaway v. New York, 442 U.S. at 215, 99 S.Ct. at 2258 (1979). 19 The manner in which Brogden was initially stopped poses no problem.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Manbeck
See Florida v. Royer, 103 S.Ct. at 1325-1326; Michigan v. Summers, 452 U.S. at 700, 101 S.Ct. at 2593 (1981); Dunaway v. New York, 442 U.S. at 215, 99 S.Ct. at 2258 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rollack
(2×)
“The proponent of a motion to suppress has the burden of establishing that his own Fourth Amendment rights were violated by the challenged search or seizure.” Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128 , 131 n. 1, 99 S.Ct. 421 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978); accord United States v. Ramapuram, 632 F.2d 1149, 1155 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1739 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Russo v. Abington Memorial Hospital
(2×)
See Taggart Corp. v. Life and Health Benefits Administration, Inc., 617 F.2d 1208 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1739 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981). 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (3) defines the terms ‘“employee benefit plan’ or ‘plan’” as follows: “an employee welfare benefit plan or an employee pension benefit plan or a plan which is both an employee welfare benefit plan and an employee pension benefit plan.” Section 1002(1)(A) defines the term “employee welfare benefit plan” to mean, in relevant part, any plan, fund, or program ... established or maintained by an …
cited
Cited "see"
Weaver v. Clarke
See Burlison v. United States, 627 F.2d 119, 122 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1740 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981). 10 Qualified immunity requires a two-step analysis.
cited
Cited "see"
Weaver v. Clarke
See Burlison v. United States, 627 F.2d 119, 122 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1740 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Buck Williams, United States of America v. Charles J. McNeal
(2×)
See United States v. Ramapuram, 632 F.2d 1149, 1155 (4th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1739 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Lee Rusher, United States of America v. Sarah Jean Shoemaker Rusher, A/K/A Sarah Anne Rusher, United States of America v. James Joseph Flannery, A/K/A James Joseph Fleming, A/K/A Richard J. Mutschler
(2×)
See United States v. Ramapuram, 632 F.2d 1149, 1155 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1739 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rusher
(2×)
See United States v. Ramapuram, 632 F.2d 1149, 1155 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1739 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sally Gahn v. Allstate Life Insurance Company
(2×)
See Taggart Corp. v. Life and Health Benefits Admin., Inc., 617 F.2d 1208, 1210 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1739 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981); Donovan v. Dillingham, 688 F.2d 1367, 1372 (11th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mary Jane Wickman v. Northwestern National Insurance Company
(2×)
See Taggart Corp. v. Life & Health Benefits Admin., 617 F.2d 1208, 1211 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1739 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Aeromar, C. Por A. v. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration
See Selco Supply Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 632 F.2d 863, 865 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1740 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charlotte James v. United States of America, Kathy Butler, Individually and as Surviving Wife and Heir of Eddy Butler v. United States of America, Susan B. Clardy, Individually and as Natural Tutrix of the Minors, Bridget Marie Clardy and Kenneth Clardy v. United States
Co., 210 F.2d at 270 ; see Burlison v. United States, 627 F.2d 119, 121 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1740 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981); Lunsford v. United States, 570 F.2d 221, 227 (8th Cir.1977); Stover v. United States, 332 F.2d 204 , 205 n. 1 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 922 , 85 S.Ct. 276 , 13 L.Ed.2d 335 (1964) 18 National Mfg.
discussed
Cited "see"
James v. United States
Co., 210 F.2d at 270 ; see Burlison v. United States, 627 F.2d 119, 121 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1740 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981); Lunsford v. United States, 570 F.2d 221, 227 (8th Cir.1977); Stover v. United States, 332 F.2d 204 , 205 n. 1 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 922 , 85 S.Ct. 276 , 13 L.Ed.2d 335 (1964). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Kromnick v. School District
(2×)
See Caulfield v. Board of Education, 632 F.2d 999 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1739 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kromnick v. School District Of Philadelphia
(2×)
See Caulfield v. Board of Education, 632 F.2d 999 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1739 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981). 82 Nonetheless, in considering any affirmative action plan designed to be remedial, the courts must not overlook the caution expressed in Justice Brennan's opinion for the Court in Weber that the plan be "a temporary measure", 443 U.S. at 208 , 99 S.Ct. at 2729 .
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Ray E. Oliver, A/K/A Edward Ray Oliver
(4×)
See United States v. Ramapuram, 632 F.2d 1149, 1155 (4th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1739 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981); United States v. Van Dyke, 643 F.2d 992, 994 (4th Cir. 1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cobler
(2×)
See United States v. Ramapuram, 632 F.2d 1149 (4th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1739 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gautier-Figueroa v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Puerto Rico, Inc.
(2×)
See e.g., Arivella v. Alcatel-Lucent, 755 F.Supp.2d 353, 364 (D.Mass.2010) (“Continuation of the certain insurance benefits for one year and the ability to roll the cash payments into an IRA do not strike the Court ... as the sort of ongoing administrative programs that would shift the [plan] into the ambit of ERISA.”); Kaelin v. Tenneco, Inc., 28 F.Supp.2d 489, 491 (N.D.Ill.1998) (determining that an employee assistance program is not an ERISA plan); see also Taggart Corp. v. Life and Health Benefits Admin., Inc., 617 F.2d 1208, 1211 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct.…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Tariq A-R-Y
(4×)
Liichow v. State, 288 Md. 502, 511 , 419 A.2d 1041, 1046 (1980); see also Doering v. State, 313 Md. 384, 397 , 545 A.2d 1281, 1287 (1988) (“In assessing the gravity of an intrusion, we consider the objective expectation of privacy that reasonably existed, and the extent to which it was invaded.”); see also United States v. Ramapuram, 632 F.2d 1149, 1154 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1739 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981) (Ownership alone is insufficient to establish a reasonable and legitimate expectation of privacy for purposes of determining the validity of a warrantless …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dodd v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
(2×)
The parties have not briefed the question of whether the CCAIA may establish or maintain an ERISA plan, see Credit Manager’s Ass’n, 809 F.2d at 625 ; see also Taggart Corp. v. Life & Health Benefits Admin., 617 F.2d 1208, 1210 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1739 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Public Citizen v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America, Nuclear Utility Management and Resources Committee, Intervenor
See also Selco Supply Co. v. EPA, 632 F.2d 863, 865 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1740 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981) (holding that statutory language similar to that of the Hobbs Act created a window).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Charlotte James v. United States of America, Kathy Butler, Individually and as Surviving Wife and Heir of Eddy Butler v. United States of America, Susan B. Clardy, Individually and as Natural Tutrix of the Minors, Bridget Marie Clardy and Kenneth Clardy v. United States
See, e.g., Burlison v. United States, 627 F.2d 119, 121 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1740 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981); Lunsford v. United States, 570 F.2d 221, 227 (8th Cir.1977); Stover v. United States, 332 F.2d 204 , 205 n. 1 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 922 , 85 S.Ct. 276 , 13 L.Ed.2d 335 (1964); National Manufacturing Co., 210 F.2d at 270.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James v. United States
See, e.g., Burlison v. United States, 627 F.2d 119, 121 (8th Cir.1980), cert, denied, 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1740 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981); Lunsford v. United States, 570 F.2d 221, 227 (8th Cir.1977); Stover v. United States, 332 F.2d 204 , 205 n. 1 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 922 , 85 S.Ct. 276 , 13 L.Ed.2d 335 (1964); National Manufacturing Co., 210 F.2d at 270.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ray E. Oliver, A/K/A Edward Ray Oliver
(2×)
See also United States v. Ramapuram, 632 F.2d 1149 (4th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 101 S.Ct. 1739 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981); United States v. Williams, 581 F.2d 451 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, William v. United States, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Caulfield
v.
Board of Education of the City of New York
v.
Board of Education of the City of New York
No. 80-1107.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 30, 1981.
Published
Citer courts: D. Connecticut (6) · D. New Mexico (2)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.