green
Positive treatment
7.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "see"
Steven Ray LAWSON, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Robert G. BORG, Warden, Respondent-Appellant
(4×)
See Gibson v. Clanon, 633 F.2d 851, 855 (9th Cir.1980) (nine hours of deliberation deemed protracted), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1035 , 101 S.Ct. 1749 , 68 L.Ed.2d 231 (1981); see also Dallago v. United States, 427 F.2d 546, 559 (D.C.Cir.1969) (five days protracted). 30 Furthermore, the extrinsic information directly related to a material issue in the case: intent.
discussed
Cited "see"
Manfred Westphal, Husband Orietta Westphal v. Steven Rubisch, D.D.S.
See Gibson v. Clanon, 633 F.2d 851 (9th Cir.) (new trial ordered when jurors consulted encyclopedia to research facts that the trial court had ruled inadmissible), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1035 (1981); Vasquez, 597 F.2d 192 (new trial ordered when jurors looked through official court file that contained inadmissible evidence). 9 Litigants are entitled to "a fair trial but not a perfect one." Hard, 870 F.2d at 1460 (quoting Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223, 231-2 (1973)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Steven Harold Erikson v. James R. Rowland
See Gibson v. Clanon, 633 F.2d 851 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1035 (1983) (juror consultation with medical encyclopedia was external); United States v. Greer, 620 F.2d 1383, 1385 (10th Cir.1980) (when marshal provided information regarding potential sentence, court admitted juror testimony and declared mistrial); United States v. Thomas, 463 F.2d 1061 (7th Cir.1972) (newspaper in jury room was external);. 14 Appellant presents the court with declarations by jurors impeaching their verdict.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Bulgin
See State v. Graham, 638 F.2d 1111, 1114 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1034 , 101 S.Ct. 1748 , 68 L.Ed.2d 231 (1981) (a shoulder purse carried by a person at the time he is stopped lies within the scope of a warrant authorizing the search of his person).
cited
Cited "see"
Diaz v. State
See Malone v. State, 390 So.2d 338 (Fla.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1034 , 101 S.Ct. 1749 , 68 L.Ed.2d 231 (1981); see also Kuhlmann v. Wilson, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 2616 , 91 L.Ed.2d 364 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Balderas
(2×)
This court has concluded, under similar circumstances and without extended discussion, that “predictable conduct by a resisting victim” of a felony cannot “constitute the kind of provocation sufficient to reduce a murder charge to voluntary manslaughter. [Citation omitted.]” (People v. Jackson (1980) 28 Cal.3d 264, 306 [ 168 Cal.Rptr. 603 , 618 P.2d 149 ] [plur. opn.; see conc, opn. of Newman, J., and dis. opn. of Mosk, J.], cert, den., 450 U.S. 1035 [ 68 L.Ed.2d 232 , 101 S.Ct. 1750 ].) Of course, neither “heat of passion” nor provocation can ever reduce a murder properly based on…
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Bowen
As this court has stated before, “Trial tactics are largely a matter left to counsel and reviewing courts are loathe to second-guess counsel in such matters.” (People v. Mastin (1981) 115 Cal.App.3d 978, 987 [ 171 Cal.Rptr. 780 ]; see *1031 also People v. Jackson (1980) 28 Cal.3d 264, 289 [ 168 Cal.Rptr. 603 , 618 P.2d 149 ], cert. den. (1981) 450 U.S. 1035 [ 68 L.Ed.2d 232 , 101 S.Ct. 1750 ]; People v. Frierson (1979) 25 Cal.3d 142, 158 [ 158 Cal.Rptr. 281 , 599 P.2d 587 ].) This is especially true in this case where the tactical choice is so patently reasonable.
discussed
Cited "see"
Spain v. Rushen
(2×)
See Gibson v. Clanon, 633 F.2d 851, 854 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1035 , 101 S.Ct. 1749 , 68 L.Ed.2d 231 (1981); see also Section III., A., 1. of this Opinion, supra. No record was made of the conversations between judge and juror at the time they occurred, and the private nature of those discussions prevented the resultant interference with the normal functions of Spain’s lawyer from being “readily apparent on the record.” Cooper v. Fitzharris, supra, 586 F.2d at 1332 ; Slappy v. Morris, supra, 649 F.2d at 723 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Fleming and Joseph Rolenc, United States of America v. $10,000 in U. S. Currency and One 1980 Cadillac, Joseph Rolenc, Claimant-Appellant
See Belton v. New York, 453 U.S. ----, ----, 101 S.Ct. 2860, 2864 , 69 L.Ed.2d 768 (1981) 9 The government also cites United States v. Graham, 638 F.2d 1111 (7th Cir. 1981), certiorari denied, 450 U.S. 1034 , 101 S.Ct. 1748 , 68 L.Ed.2d 231 .
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. John Bagnariol, United States of America v. Gordon L. Walgren, United States of America v. Patrick Gallagher
(4×)
See Gibson v. Clanon, 633 F.2d 851, 855 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1035 , 101 S.Ct. 1749 , 68 L.Ed.2d 231 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Williams v. State
See our opinion, delivered after the trial of the case at bar, in Miller v. State, 269 Ark. 341 , 605 S.W. 2d 430 (1980), cert. den. 450 U.S. 1035 (1981).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Barnes
(4×)
See, e.g., Gibson v. Clanon, 633 F.2d 851 (9th Cir.1980) (jury consulted medical text concerning blood types and medication), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1035 , 101 S.Ct. 1749 , 68 L.Ed.2d 231 (1981); Kirby v. Rosell, 133 Ariz. 42 , 648 P.2d 1048 (1982) (jury consulted business law text); Alvarez v. People, 653 P.2d 1127 (Colo.1982) (jury consulted dictionary); Brockie v. Omo Construction, Inc., 255 Mont. 495 , 844 P.2d 61 (1992) (jury consulted library books dealing with subject of technical expert's testimony).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hightower
See also Miller v. State, 269 Ark. 341 , 605 S.W.2d 430, 439-40 (1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1035 , 101 S.Ct. 1750 , 68 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Eddie Lee Miller v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
See also Miller v. State, 269 Ark. 341, 358 , 605 S.W.2d 430, 441 (1980) (Fogleman, C.J., dissenting), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1035 , 101 S.Ct. 1750 , 68 L.Ed.2d 232 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donald Dickson v. G.E. Sullivan, Superintendent, Oregon State Correctional Institution
(2×)
A defendant is entitled to a new trial when the jury obtains or uses evidence that has not been introduced during trial if there is “a reasonable possibility that the extrinsic material could have affected the verdict.” Id. (emphasis in original), quoting United States v. Vasquez, 597 F.2d 192, 193 (9th Cir.1979) (Vasquez); see also Gibson v. Clanen, 633 F.2d 851 , 855 (9th Cir.1980) (Gibson), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1035 , 101 S.Ct. 1749 , 68 L.Ed.2d 231 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Leslie Craig Robertson, and Connie M. Steeprow
(2×)
See also United States v. Graham, 638 F.2d 1111, 1114 (7th Cir.) (purses or shoulder bags are appended to the body and thus included within the concept of one's person), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1034 , 101 S.Ct. 1748 , 68 L.Ed.2d 231 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Monongahela Power Co.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 80-1268.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 30, 1981.
Black, Certiorari.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice Black-mun would grant certiorari.