green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
Quoted verbatim 7×
13.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1992 ·
…once a proper appeal is taken, the district court may generally take action only in aid of the appeal or to correct clerical errors as allowed by the federal rules of civil (or criminal) procedure.
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1993 ·
…prima facie proof of a constitutional violation must include evidence of impermissible motive
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Ruffalo, Ruffalo v. Civiletti
But cf. Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599, 620 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981) (expressing doubts, in the context of a constitutional claim brought by relocated children, as to whether a meaningful post-deprivation hearing could be arranged without endangering the children). 14 The rights of parents, to be sure, are not absolute.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Ruffalo v. Civiletti
But cf. Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599, 620 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981) (expressing doubts, in the context of a constitutional claim brought by relocated children, as to whether a meaningful post-deprivation hearing could be arranged without endangering the children).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Alicia Correa v. Steve Fischer, and Willacy County
prima facie proof of a constitutional violation must include evidence of impermissible motive
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Correa v. Fischer
prima facie proof of a constitutional violation must include evidence of impermissible motive
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re De Kleinman
once a proper appeal is taken, the district court may generally take action only in aid of the appeal or to correct clerical errors as allowed by the federal rules of civil (or criminal) procedure.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Washington Square Post 1212 American Legion v. City of New York
public officials may be held responsible only to the extent that they caused the plaintiff's rights to be violated; they cannot be held liable for violations committed by their subordinates_
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Charles & Lillian Brown's Hotel, Inc.
once a proper appeal is taken, the district court may generally take action only in aid of the appeal or to correct clerical errors as allowed by the federal rules of civil (or criminal) procedure.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Kansas Cities v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Kansas Gas and Electric Company, Intervenor
this contract, including the tariff made a part hereof, shall at all times be subject to such changes or modifications as shall be ordered from time to time by any legally constituted regulatory body having jurisdiction to require such changes or modifications
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Johnson v. Baskerville
the district court has the power to dismiss a complaint sua sponte for failure to state a claim.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Stewart v. United States
Since plaintiffs father thus possessed sufficient critical facts to be put on notice both that his son faced an increased risk of testicular cancer as far back as 1968, and, in 1976, that his son had lost a testicle, and since the FTCA’s statute of limitations is not tolled due to the minority status of the claimant, Landreth By and Through Ore v. United States, 850 F.2d 532, 534 (9th Cir.1988); Jastremski v. United States, 737 F.2d 666, 669 (7th Cir.1984); Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599, 624 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 5.Ct. 1975, 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981); compare …
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Metro North State Bank v. the Barrick Group, Inc. (In Re the Barrick Group, Inc.)
See International Assoc, of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 847 F.2d 1014, 1017 (2d Cir.1988); Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599, 609-10 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct.1975, 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981); 7 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 60.30[2], at 60-331 to -332 (2d ed.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
KB Dissolution Corp. v. GREAT AMERICAN OPPORTUNITIES, INC.
See Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599, 609-11 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
National Council of La Raza v. Department of Justice
See Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599, 609-11 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981). 5 .
cited
Cited "see"
Figueroa v. Savanar Restaurant, Inc.
See Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599, 609-10 (2d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Federated Conservationists of Westchester County, Inc. v. City of Yonkers
See Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599 , 609 n. 11 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981); Kearney v. Todd L.
cited
Cited "see"
Gucci America, Inc. v. Gold Center Jewelry
See Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599, 609-11 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981). 12 .
cited
Cited "see"
Savino v. Computer Credit, Inc.
Id. at 251; see Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599, 610 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Frank Rodgers
See Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599, 610-11 (2d Cir.1980) (notice of appeal from a district court order that was non-final did not divest the jurisdiction of the district court), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981); see also Burger King Corp. v. The Horn & Hardart Co., 893 F.2d 525, 527 (2d Cir.1990) (premature notice of appeal from a non-final order of the district court not disposing of all issues in the complaint and countercomplaint does not divest district court of jurisdiction); SEC v. American Bd. of Trade, Inc., 829 F.2d 341 , 344 (2d Cir.1987) (…
discussed
Cited "see"
Lee v. Arrowpac, Inc.
See Leonhard v. United States 633 F.2d 599 , 609 n. 11 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981) (district court can dismiss a complaint sua sponte for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted or the elapse of the statute of limitations).
discussed
Cited "see"
Platsky v. Studeman
See Platsky, 953 F.2d at 28 (citing Mack v. United States, 814 F.2d 120, 122-23 (2d Cir.1987) and Leonhard v. U.S., 633 F.2d 599 , 618 n. 27 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981)).
discussed
Cited "see"
John D. Stough v. Walter J. Gallagher
(2×)
See Tanner v. McCall, 625 F.2d 1183, 1186 (5th Cir.1980), cert, denied, 451 U.S. 907 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
LTV Corp. v. United Mine Workers (In re Chateaugay Corp.)
See Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599, 611 (2d Cir.1980) (“In the absence of prejudice to the nonappealing party, this Court too has declined to dismiss premature notices of appeal where subsequent actions of the district court have imbued the order appealed from with finality.”), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Chateaugay Corporation
See Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599, 611 (2d Cir.1980) ("In the absence of prejudice to the nonappealing party, this Court too has declined to dismiss premature notices of appeal where subsequent actions of the district court have imbued the order appealed from with finality."), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
LTV Steel Co. v. United Mine Workers
See Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599, 611 (2d Cir.1980) (“In the absence of prejudice to the nonappealing party, this Court too has declined to dismiss premature notices' of appeal where subsequent actions of the district court have imbued the order appealed from with finality.”), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harden v. State
See Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599, 624 (2d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981); Smith v. United States, 588 F.2d 1209, 1211 (8th Cir.1978); Pittman v. United States, 341 F.2d 739, 741 (9th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 394 , 15 L.Ed.2d 351 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bonanno Organized Crime Family of La Cosa Nostra
See Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599 , 609 n. 11 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981); 5 C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Erma Ray v. City of Leeds, and Jack Courson, Individually and in His Capacity as Mayor of the City of Leeds
See Tanner v. McCall, 625 F.2d 1183, 1190 (5th Cir.1980) (observing that Branti requires the employer to “show that the required political support or affiliation is relevant or essential to the job”), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 907 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
State Highway Administration v. Kee
(2×)
See Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981); De Tore v. Local # 245 of the Jersey City Pub.
discussed
Cited "see"
Baskin v. Hawley
Hastings v. Maine-Endwell Central School District, 676 F.2d at 896 ; see Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599, 608 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Baskin v. Hawley
Hastings v. Maine-Endwell Central School District, 676 F.2d at 896 ; see Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599, 608 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Habenicht v. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.
See DeFourneaux v. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc., 503 F.Supp. 2, 4-5 (D.Conn.) aff'd, 639 F.2d 768 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Albert A. Greenwood
See United States v. Johnson, 634 F.2d 735 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 907 , 101 S.Ct. 1974 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981) (fraudulent medicaid forms probative of requisite intent for income tax evasion); see also United States v. Kaufman, 453 F.2d 306, 311 (2d Cir.1971) (prior tax fraud admissible as probative of intent in falsifying affidavits).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bobby G. Freeman on Behalf of Himself and the Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Laura Freeman v. Lester Coggins Trucking, Inc., and Kenneth R. Deis
See Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599, 616 (2d Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981); Smith v. Hood, 396 F.2d 692, 693 (D.C.Cir.1968); Sayre v. Crews, 184 F.2d 723, 724 (5th Cir.1950); IB Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 0.411[11] (1984); 18 Wright, Miller, and Cooper, Federal Practice and Procedure § 4459 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Donald C. Tomczak v. The City of Chicago, an Illinois Municipal Corporation
See Tanner v. McCall, 625 F.2d 1183, 1194-96 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 907 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
TBS Pacific, Inc. v. Tamura
See Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599 (2d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981); Cochran v. Birkel, 651 F.2d 1219 (6th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1152 , 102 S.Ct. 1020 , 71 L.Ed.2d 307 (1982); Weisman v. Darneille, 79 F.R.D. 389 (S.D.N.Y. 1978); 16 Wright, Miller, Cooper & Gressman, Federal Practice and Procedure; Jurisdiction §3949, n. 13, at 359 (1977). 2 The failure to decide a party’s entitlement to costs and fees does not prevent a claim or the rights and liabilities of a party from being fully decided.
discussed
Cited "see"
Crist ex rel. Crist Trucking Co. v. United States Department of Labor
See Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599 , 618 n. 27 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981) (sovereign immunity defense of United States extended to protect federal agencies from liability for constitutional torts); Kessler v. General Services Administration, 341 F.2d 275 (2d Cir.1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arizona Public Service Company, Intervenor
See Public Service Co. of New Mexico v. FERC, 628 F.2d 1267, 1270 (10th Cir.1980), cert.. denied, 451 U.S. 907 , 101 S.Ct. 1974 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981); Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. FERC, 587 F.2d 671, 676 (5th Cir.1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Barnett v. Webster
See Bullard v. Webster, et al, 623 F.2d 1042 (5th Cir.1980) cert. den. 451 U.S. 907 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1980); Bramley v. Webster, et al., 476 F.Supp. 351 (E.D.Pa. 1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Devernon Le Grand v. Matthew Evan, Clerk, Soal Schnertre, Clerk, City of New York, Kings County, State of New York
See Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599, 621 (2d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sikes v. Boone
See Tanner v. McCall, 625 F.2d 1183 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 907 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981) (applying Florida law); Barrett v. Thomas, 649 F.2d 1193 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 925 , 102 S.Ct. 1969 , 72 L.Ed.2d 440 (1982) (applying Texas law); Allen v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, 515 F.Supp. 1185 (D.S.C.1981) (applying South Carolina law); Slack v. Bishop, 444 F.Supp. 1161 (W.D.La.1978) (applying Louisiana law).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hancock
United States v. Janis, 1 M.J. 395 (C.M.A.1976); Mil.R.Evid. 403; see United States v. Johnson, 634 F.2d 735 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 907 , 101 S.Ct. 1974 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981); United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
McHazlett v. Otis Engineering Corp.
See Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981); United States v. Studivant, 529 F.2d 673 (3d Cir.1976); Siegmund v. General Commodities Corp., 175 F.2d 952 (9th Cir.1949); Tidewater Insurance Associates, Inc. v. Dryden Oil Company, Inc., 42 Md.App. 415 , 401 A.2d 178 (Ct.Spec.App.1979); State For Use and Benefit of Moak v. Moore, 373 So.2d 1011 (Miss.1979); Rae v. All American Life and Casualty Co., 95 Nev. 920 , 605 P.2d 196 (1979); Gumpp v. Philadelphia Life Insurance Co., 562 S.W.2d 885 (Tex.Civ.App.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
BGW Associates, Inc. v. Valley Broadcasting Co.
See Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599, 609-10 (2d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 907 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981); International Paper Co. v. Whitson, 595 F.2d 559, 561-62 (10th Cir. 1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
United States v. Rodgers, 101 F.3d 247, 251-52 (2d Cir.1996); see also Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599, 610-11 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Preston v. New York
See Trotman v. Palisades Interstate Park Commission, 557 F.2d 35, 39-40 (2d Cir.1977); See also Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599, 621 (2d Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Elizabeth Millares Guiraldes De Tineo and Boris Baptista Millares v. United States
Finally, the Act provides that [a] tort claim against the United States shall be forever barred unless, it is presented in writing to the appropriate Federal agency within two years after such claim accrues .... 28 U.S.C. § 2401 (b) (emphases added); see, e.g., Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599, 624 (2d Cir.1980) (no jurisdiction where claims were presented to agency more than two years after accrual), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981); Bialowas v. United States, 443 F.2d 1047, 1048-50 (3d Cir.1971) (no jurisdiction where amount of claim was specified o…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Haywood Champion v. Christopher Artuz, Superintendent Sgt. v. Guarracino
See, e.g., Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599 , 621 n. 30 (2d Cir.1980) (respondeat-superior claim is not cognizable under § 1983), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 908 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
McRae v. Douglas
See also Tanner v. McCall, 441 F. Supp. 503 (M.D.Fla. 1977), modified on other grounds, 625 F.2d 1183 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 907 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Romero v. State
By statute, Florida deputy sheriffs have the “same power” as the sheriff appointing them and may serve warrants on behalf of the sheriff. §§ 30.07 and 30.15(l)(b), Fla.Stat. (1991); see also Tanner v. McCall, 626 F.2d 1183 (5th Cir.1980) (describing deputies as a sheriffs alter ego with all the sheriffs sovereign powers except the power to appoint other deputies), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 907 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981); Johnson v. Wilson, 336 So.2d 651 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976) (equating power of sheriff and deputy sheriff under section 30.07).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tanner
v.
McCall
v.
McCall
No. 80-1227.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 20, 1981.
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.