green
Positive treatment
6.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Barker-Hatch v. Viejas Group Baron Long Capitan Grande Band of Digueno Mission Indians of Viejas Group Reservation
See Gila River Indian Community v. Henningson, Durham & Richardson, 626 F.2d 708, 715 (9th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 451 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981); see also Martinez v. Southern Ute Tribe, 249 F.2d 915 , 917 (10th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 960 , 78 S.Ct. 998 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1958).
discussed
Cited "see"
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Tonawanda Band of Seneca Indians
See Gila River Indian Community v. Henningson, Durham & Richardson, 626 F.2d 708, 714-16 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981); see also Tamiami Partners, Ltd. v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians, 999 F.2d 503, 507 (11th Cir.1993) (finding federal question jurisdiction lacking where plaintiff asserted jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 but “presented] facts establishing a breach of contract claim”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation v. Tonawanda Band Of Seneca Indians
See Gila River Indian Community v. Henningson, Durham & Richardson, 626 F.2d 708, 714-15 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981); see also Tamiami Partners, Ltd. v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians, 999 F.2d 503, 507 (11th Cir.1993) (finding federal question jurisdiction lacking where plaintiff asserted jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 but "present[ed] facts establishing a breach of contract claim").
discussed
Cited "see"
Alice Paulette Pagan v. Shoney's, Inc.
See Hadra v. Herman Blum Consulting Engineers, 632 F.2d 1242, 1246 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981); Burger King Corp. v. Mason, 710 F.2d 1480, 1487 (11th Cir.1983) (reviewing fifth circuit rulings on compromise verdicts), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1102 , 104 S.Ct. 1599 , 80 L.Ed.2d 130 (1984): see also National R.R.
discussed
Cited "see"
Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Plaintiff/counterclaim-Defendant/appellant v. California State Board of Equalization Richard Nevins, in His Official Capacity as Chairman of the State Board of Equalization Conway H. Collis, in His Official Capacity as a Member of the State Board of Equalization Ernest J. Dronenburg, Jr., in His Official Capacity as a Member of the State Board of Equalization William M. Bennett, in His Official Capacity as a Member of the State Board of Equalization, Clive Miller, Defendant/counterclaimant/appellee. Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Plaintiff/counterclaim-Defendant/appellee v. California State Board of Equalization, and Clive Miller, Defendant/counterclaimant/appellant. Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. California State Board of Equalization
See Gila River Indian Community v. Henningson, Durham & Richardson, 626 F.2d 708, 714 (9th Cir.1980) (declining to interpret "arising under" language in section 1362 more broadly than identical language in section 1331), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981). 17 The Supreme Court has explained that an action arises under federal law if that law creates the cause of action, American Well Works Co. v. Layne & Bowler Co., 241 U.S. 257, 260 , 36 S.Ct. 585, 586 , 60 L.Ed. 987 (1916), or if a substantial question of federal law is a necessary element of plaintiff's caus…
discussed
Cited "see"
Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. California State Board of Equalization
See Gila River Indian Community v. Henningson, Durham & Richardson, 626 F.2d 708, 714 (9th Cir.1980) (declining to interpret “arising under” language in section 1362 more broadly than identical language in section 1331), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. California State Board of Equalization
See Gila River Indian Community v. Henningson, Durham & Richardson, 626 F.2d 708, 714 (9th Cir.1980) (declining to interpret “arising under” language in section 1362 more broadly than identical language in section 1331), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Plaintiff/counterclaim-Defendant/appellant v. California State Board of Equalization Richard Nevins, in His Official Capacity as Chairman of the State Board of Equalization Conway H. Collis, in His Official Capacity as a Member of the State Board of Equalization Ernest J. Dronenburg, Jr., in His Official Capacity as a Member of the State Board of Equalization William M. Bennett, in His Official Capacity as a Member of the State Board of Equalization, Clive Miller, Defendant/counterclaimant/appellee. Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Plaintiff/counterclaim-Defendant/appellee v. California State Board of Equalization, and Clive Miller, Defendant/counterclaimant/appellant. Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. California State Board of Equalization
See Gila River Indian Community v. Henningson, Durham & Richardson, 626 F.2d 708, 714 (9th Cir.1980) (declining to interpret "arising under" language in section 1362 more broadly than identical language in section 1331), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981). 17 The Supreme Court has explained that an action arises under federal law if that law creates the cause of action, American Well Works Co. v. Layne & Bowler Co., 241 U.S. 257, 260 , 36 S.Ct. 585, 586 , 60 L.Ed. 987 (1916), or if a substantial question of federal law is a necessary element of plaintiff's caus…
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph Davis Farrar and Dale Lawson Farrar v. Clarence D. Cain
See Hadra v. Herman Blum Consulting Eng'rs, 632 F.2d 1242, 1245-46 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981); see also Eximco, Inc. v. Trane Co., 748 F.2d 287, 290 (5th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Maxey v. Freightliner Corp.
See Hadra v. Herman Blum Consulting Engineers, 632 F.2d 1242, 1245-46 (5th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981) (re-trial on issue of damages only); Lowe v. General Motors Corporation, 624 F.2d 1373 , 1384 (5th Cir.1980) (if the plaintiffs failed to accept a remittitur on amount of punitive damages, the district court “may order a new trial solely on the issue of damages”); 1 Davis v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 532 F.2d 489, 491 (5th Cir.1976) (re-trial limited to damages); Stewart v. Atlantic Pipe Line Co., 479 F.2d 311, 312 (5th Cir.1973) (statement …
cited
Cited "see"
5 Employee Benefits Cas. 1917, unempl.ins.rep. (Cch) P 21,716 Michael Rivera, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant-Appellee, and International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America and Donald E. Volck, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Cross- Appellants-Appellees v. Gloria Becerra, Director of California Employment Development Department, and Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of United States Department of Labor, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
See Gila River Indian Community v. Henningson, Durham & Richardson, 626 F.2d 708, 710 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Rivera v. Becerra
See Gila River Indian Community v. Henningson, Durham & Richardson, 626 F.2d 708, 710 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
JAMES COUTEE, et. al., Plaintiffs, JAMES COUTEE v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
See id., (citing Hadra v. Herman Blum Consulting Engineers, 632 F.2d 1242, 1246 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Western Shoshone Business Council ex rel. Western Shoshone Tribe of the Duck Valley Reservation v. Babbitt
See, e.g., Gila River Indian Community v. Henningson, Durham & Richardson, 626 F.2d 708, 714-15 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981); Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Martinez, 519 F.2d 479, 481-82 (10th Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Western Shoshone Business Council v. Babbitt
See, e.g., Gila River Indian Community v. Henningson, Durham & Richardson, 626 F.2d 708, 714-15 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981); Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Martinez, 519 F.2d 479, 481-82 (10th Cir.1975). 26 Plaintiffs invoke 28 U.S.C.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Diamond D Enterprises USA, Inc. v. Steinsvaag
See, e.g., Hadra v. Herman Blum Consulting Eng’rs, 632 F.2d 1242, 1245-46 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Diamond Enterprises USA, Inc. v. Steinsvaag
See, e.g., Hadra v. Herman Blum Consulting Eng'rs, 632 F.2d 1242, 1245-46 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Chat Phav v. Trueblood, Inc.
See, e.g., Hadra v. Herman Blum Consulting Engineers, 632 F.2d 1242, 1246 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mekdeci v. Merrell National Laboratories
See, e.g., Hadra v. Herman Blum Consulting Engineers, 632 F.2d 1242, 1246 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mekdeci, David v. Merrell National Laboratories
See, e.g., Hadra v. Herman Blum Consulting Engineers, 632 F.2d 1242, 1246 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Burger King Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Gerald A. Mason, Cross-Appellees. Burger King Corporation, a Florida Corporation, Counter- Cross-Appellant v. Gerald A. Mason, Counter-Plaintiffs, Cross
See, e.g., Hadra v. Herman Blum Consulting Engineers, 632 F.2d 1242, 1247 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981); Davis v. Becker & Associates, Inc., 608 F.2d 621 (5th Cir.1979); Bassett Furniture Industries of North Carolina, Inc. v. NVF Co., 576 F.2d 1084, 1094 (5th Cir.), reh. denied with opinion, 583 F.2d 778 (5th Cir.1978); Parker v. Wideman, 380 F.2d 433, 437 (5th Cir.1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Burger King Corp. v. Mason
See, e.g., Hadra v. Herman Blum Consulting Engineers, 632 F.2d 1242, 1247 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981); Davis v. Becker & Associates, Inc., 608 F.2d 621 (5th Cir.1979); Bassett Furniture Industries of North Carolina, Inc. v. NVF Co., 576 F.2d 1084, 1094 (5th Cir.), reh. denied with opinion, 583 F.2d 778 (5th Cir.1978); Parker v. Wideman, 380 F.2d 433, 437 (5th Cir.1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph Paul Franklin
See also United States v. Buchanan, 633 F.2d 423, 426 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1984 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981); United States v. Williams, 577 F.2d 188, 192 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 , 99 S.Ct. 196 , 58 L.Ed.2d 179 (1978); United States v. Adcock, 558 F.2d 397, 402 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 921 , 98 S.Ct. 395 , 54 L.Ed.2d 277 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kurtz
v.
New York
v.
New York
No. 80-1510.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 20, 1981.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.