green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
4.9 score
“the court in baldasar divided in such a way that no rule can be said to have resulted”
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Castro-Vega
the court in baldosar divided in such a way that no rule can be said to have resulted
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Julio Castro-Vega
the court in baldasar divided in such a way that no rule can be said to have resulted
discussed
Cited "see"
Ruffin v. United States
(2×)
See Gaffney v. United States, 421 A.2d 924, 928 (D.C.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 941 , 101 S.Ct. 2026 , 68 L.Ed.2d 330 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Schindler v. Clerk of Circuit Court
See United States v. Robles-Sandoval, 637 F.2d 692 , 693 n. 1 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 941 , 101 S.Ct. 2025 , 68 L.Ed.2d 330 (1981). 5 14 Underlying the views of the plurality in Baldasar was the concern that the State of Illinois, by sentencing the defendant to an increased term of imprisonment, was punishing him for his earlier criminal conviction, which had been returned without benefit of counsel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Schindler v. Clerk of Circuit Court
See United States v. Robles-Sandoval, 637 F.2d 692 , 693 n. 1 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 451 U.S. 941 , 101 S.Ct. 2025 , 68 L.Ed.2d 330 (1981). 5 Underlying the views of the plurality in Baldasar was the concern that the State of Illinois, by sentencing the defendant to an increased term of imprisonment, was punishing him for his earlier criminal conviction, which had been returned without benefit of counsel.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David B. Wilber
See United States v. Miller, 634 F.2d 1134, 1135 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 942 , 101 S.Ct. 2026 , 68 L.Ed.2d 330 (1981); United States v. Pohlman, 522 F.2d 974, 977 (8th Cir.1975) (en banc), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1049 , 96 S.Ct. 776 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Dumas
See, e.g., United States v. Robles-Sandoval, 637 F.2d 692 (9th Cir.1981), cert, denied, 451 U.S. 941 , 101 S.Ct. 2025 , 68 L.Ed.2d 330 (1981) (holding that where defendant received all the process that was due in the prior civil proceeding, that proceeding could be used to enhance a subsequent criminal charge); Schindler v. Clerk of Circuit Court, 715 F.2d 341 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1068 , 104 S.Ct. 1419 , 79 L.Ed.2d 745 (1984) (allowing civil forfeiture after first DWI offense to enhance subsequent offenses, even though obtained without counsel and without valid waiver of coun…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Dowd
See, e.g., United States v. Robles-Sandoval, 637 F.2d 692 , 693 n. 1 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 941 , 101 S.Ct. 2025 , 68 L.Ed.2d 330 (1981). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Rasool, Abiff Hiram
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Delos-Rios, 642 F.2d 42 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 101 S.Ct. 2025 , 68 L.Ed.2d 330 (1981) (no independent expectation of privacy with regard to a partially opened paper bag found in back seat of car); United States v. Sutton, 636 F.2d 96 (5th Cir. 1981) (warrantless search of paper sack from a local pharmacy found on front floorboard of automobile driven by defendant upheld); United States v. Foskey, 636 F.2d 517 (D.C.Cir.1980) (defendant did not have reasonable expectation of privacy with respect to contents of paper bag which was wrapped around gas pi…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Vincent Martino, John Torrioni, Policardo Despaigne, A/K/A \Paulie
(4×)
See also United States v. Delos-Rios, 642 F.2d 42, 461 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 941 , 101 S.Ct. 2024 , 68 L.Ed.2d 330 , 451 U.S. 941 , 101 S.Ct. 2025 , 68 L.Ed.2d 330 (1981) (no legitimate expectation of privacy in partially open paper bag).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Garcia-Yepes
v.
United States and Delos-Rios v. United States
v.
United States and Delos-Rios v. United States
No. 80-6370; No. 80-6420.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 27, 1981.
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 642 F. 2d 42.