green
Positive treatment
6.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Felix E. Capoeman v. Amos Reed
But see Wallace v. King, 626 F.2d 1157, 1161 (4th Cir.1980) (immunity allowed where law not authoritatively decided by the Supreme Court, the “appropriate” court of appeals, or the highest state court), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 969 , 101 S.Ct. 2045 , 68 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981).
discussed
Cited "but see"
In Re Flight Transportation Corporation Securities Litigation
But cf. In re U.S. Financial Inc., 648 F.2d 515 , 517-21 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 970 , 101 S.Ct. 2046 , 68 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981) (holding that, under prior law but using Slain/Kripke analysis, absolute-priority rule defeated claim for rescission and reclamation, even though res could be traced).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Drexel Burnham Lambert Inc. v. Flight Transportation Corp.
But cf. In re U.S. Financial Inc., 648 F.2d 515 , 517-21 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 970 , 101 S.Ct. 2046 , 68 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981) (holding that, under pri- or law but using Slain/Kripke analysis, absolute-priority rule defeated claim for rescission and reclamation, even though res could be traced).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jeffries v. Harleton
See Selzer v. Fleisher, 629 F.2d 809, 812 (2d Cir.1980) ("A prior judicial decision holding conduct such as appellants' to be a basis for suit was not necessary to apprise them of a rule which should come as no surprise...."), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 970 , 101 S.Ct. 2046 , 68 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jeffries v. Harleston
See Selzer v. Fleisher, 629 F.2d 809, 812 (2d Cir.1980) (“A prior judicial decision holding conduct such as appellants’ to be a basis for suit was not necessary to apprise them of a rule which should come as no surprise_”), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 970 , 101 S.Ct. 2046 , 68 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Paul F. McDonald v. Piedmont Aviation Inc.
See Selzer v. Fleisher, 629 F.2d 809, 812 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 970 , 101 S.Ct. 2046 , 68 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Al-Khazraji v. Saint Francis College
See Liotta v. National Forge Company, 629 F.2d 903, 906 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied 451 U.S. 970 , 101 S.Ct. 2046 , 68 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981); Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College, 590 F.2d 470 (3d Cir.1978), cert. denied 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 41 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Al-Khazraji v. Saint Francis College
See Liotta v. National Forge Company, 629 F.2d 903, 906 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied 451 U.S. 970 , 101 S.Ct. 2046 , 68 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981); Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College, 590 F.2d 470 (3d Cir.1978), cert. denied 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 41 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Creighton v. City of St. Paul
See Wallace v. King, 626 F.2d 1157, 1161 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 969 , 101 S.Ct. 2045 , 68 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981); United States v. Glover, 555 F.Supp. 604 (D.D.C.1982), affirmed, 725 F.2d 120 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1682 , 80 L.Ed.2d 157 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Creighton v. City Of St. Paul
See Wallace v. King, 626 F.2d 1157, 1161 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 969 , 101 S.Ct. 2045 , 68 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981); United States v. Glover, 555 F.Supp. 604 (D.D.C.1982), affirmed, 725 F.2d 120 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 1682 , 80 L.Ed.2d 157 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Crews
See Wallace v. King, 626 F. 2d 1157 (4th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 969 , 68 L.Ed. 2d 348 , 101 S.Ct. 2045 (1981) (lack of consent to search beyond entry hall made search improper); State v. Nelson, 298 N.C. 573 , 260 S.E. 2d 629 (1979), cert. denied sub nom., Jolly v. North Carolina, 446 U.S. 929 , 64 L.Ed. 2d 282 , 100 S.Ct. 1867 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Messina v. Iowa Department of Job Service
See Liotta v. National Forge Co., 473 F.Supp. 1139, 1144 (W.D.Pa.1979), aff’d in part and rev’d in part, 629 F.2d 903 (3d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 970 , 101 S.Ct. 2045 , 2046, 68 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Harlan Waksal
See United States v. Viegas, 639 F.2d 42 , 44 n. 3 (1st Cir.), reh. denied, 451 U.S. 970 , 101 S.Ct. 2046 , 68 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981); United States v. Black, 675 F.2d 129, 140 (7th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fred S. Berryman
(2×)
See United States v. Viegas, 639 F.2d 42, 44 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 970 , 101 S.Ct. 2046 , 68 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wallraff
United States v. Ramirez-Cifuentes, supra. As another court confronted with a similar situation has noted, “[i]t must be rare indeed that an officer observes behavior consistent only with guilt and incapable of innocent interpretation.” United States v. Black, supra, 675 F.2d at 137 , quoting United States v. Price, 599 F.2d 494, 502 (2d Cir.1979); accord, United States v. Viegas, 639 F.2d 42, 45 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 970 , 101 S.Ct. 2046 , 68 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Frederick Swayne
(2×)
See United States v. Viegas, 639 F.2d 42, 45 (1st Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 970 , 101 S.Ct. 2046 , 68 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981); United States v. Corbitt, 675 F.2d 626, 629 (4th Cir.1982), for a discussion of the standards governing the detention of luggage. .
cited
Cited "see"
Sellers v. Spiegel, Inc.
See Liotta v. National Forge Co., 629 F.2d 903 (3d Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 451 U.S. 970 , 101 S.Ct. 2045 , 68 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Nembhard and James Wilson
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Viegas, 639 F.2d 42 , 45 n.5 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 970 , 101 S.Ct. 2046 , 68 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981). 12 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Robinson v. Cuyler
Normally, if a motion for summary judgment is supported by sworn affidavits or other material, “an adverse party may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials of his pleading, but his response, by affidavits or as otherwise provided in this rule, must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.” Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 56(e); see Liotta v. National Forge Co., 629 F.2d 903, 907-08 (3d Cir. 1980), *164 cert. denied — U.S. —, 101 S.Ct. 2045 , 68 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stratte-McClure v. Stanley
The Supreme Court has instructed that “[s]ilence, absent a duty to disclose, is not misleading under Rule 10b-5.” Basic, 485 U.S. at 239 n. 17, 108 S.Ct. 978 ; see also Chiarella v. United States, 445 U.S. 222, 230 , 100 S.Ct. 1108 , 68 L.Ed.2d 348 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
West Virginia Pride, Inc. v. Wood County, W. Va.
While these officials often enjoy immunity from damages liability, “they are natural targets for § 1983 injunctive suits since they are the state officers who are threatening to enforce and who are enforcing the law.” Supreme Court of Va. v. Consumers Union, 446 U.S. 719, 736 , 100 S.Ct. 1967, 1977 , 64 L.Ed.2d 641 (1980) (stating prosecutor subject to injunctive relief); see also Wallace v. King, 626 F.2d 1157, 1161 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 969 , 101 S.Ct. 2045 , 68 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981); Gross v. Tazewell County Jail, 533 F.Supp. 413, 419 (holding sheriff is subject to injunc…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Celso Lopez, A/K/A Celso Lopez Lopez v. R.D. Garriga
It is well settled that seizure occurs “only if, in view of all of the circum *69 stances surrounding the incident, a reasonable person would have believed that he was not free to leave.” United States v. Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544, 554 , 100 S.Ct. 1870, 1877 , 64 L.Ed.2d 497 (1980) (opinion of Stewart, J.); see also United States v. Viegas, 639 F.2d 42, 44 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 970 , 101 S.Ct. 2046 , 68 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Woods v. Partenreederei Ms. Yankee Clipper
See also Raymond v. I/S Caribia, 626 F.2d 203, 206 (1st Cir.1980), cert. denied 451 U.S. 969 , 101 S.Ct. 2045 , 68 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Erdmann v. BD. OF EDUC. UNION CTY. REG. HIGH SCH.
See also, Liotta v. National Forge Co., 629 F.2d 903 (3d Cir. 1980) cert. den., 451 U.S. 970 , 101 S.Ct. 2046 , 68 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981); Davis v. U.S. Steel Supply, 581 F.2d 335, 336 (3d Cir. 1978); Page v. Curtis-Wright Corp., supra, at 1065.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Erdmann v. Board of Education
See also, Liotta v. National Forge Co., 629 F.2d 903 (3d Cir. 1980) cert. den., 451 U.S. 970 , 101 S.Ct. 2046 , 68 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981); Davis v. U.S. Steel Supply, 581 F.2d 335, 336 (3d Cir. 1978); Page v. Curtis-Wright Corp., supra, at 1065.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ronald G. Black
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Viegas, 639 F.2d 42, 44 (1st Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 970 , 101 S.Ct. 2046 , 68 L.Ed.2d 348 ; United States v. Allen, 644 F.2d 749 (9th Cir. 1980); United States v. Elmore, 595 F.2d 1036 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 910 , 100 S.Ct. 2998 , 64 L.Ed.2d 861 (1980); see United States v. Jefferson, 650 F.2d 854 (6th Cir. 1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
King, Chief, Fairfax County Police Department
v.
Wallace
v.
Wallace
No. 80-503.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 4, 1981.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certio-rari denied.