green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 5×
11.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1985 ·
…although 209(b) allows states to use standards more restrictive than those under the ssi program, the provision can not be viewed as an all-purpose 'grandfathering' clause which effectively legitimizes any and every provision appearing in a state plan in 1972.
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1986 ·
…although sec. 209(b) allows states to use standards more restrictive than those under the ssi program, the provision can not be viewed as an all-purpose 'grandfathering' clause which effectively legitimizes any and every provision appearing in a state plan in 1972
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1999 ·
…because a person's expectation of privacy in an automobile is significantly less than one's expectation of privacy in his home . . . resort to the judicial process prior to the search of an automobile is often not required
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Limited
State v. Donahue
(2×)
he plainly furtive conduct of the occupants of that vehicle observed by the officer as he approached certainly justified the limited intrusion upon the defendant's personal liberty
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Eady
(2×)
because a person's expectation of privacy in an automobile is significantly less than one's expectation of privacy in his home . . . resort to the judicial process prior to the search of an automobile is often not required
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Bourque
spontaneous and voluntary statements, not given as a result of police interrogation or compelling influence, are admissible in evidence without miranda warnings even where a defendant is in custody.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State of Minnesota v. Heckler
(2×)
although sec. 209(b) allows states to use standards more restrictive than those under the ssi program, the provision can not be viewed as an all-purpose 'grandfathering' clause which effectively legitimizes any and every provision appearing in a state plan in 1972
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Minnesota v. Heckler
(2×)
although 209(b) allows states to use standards more restrictive than those under the ssi program, the provision can not be viewed as an all-purpose 'grandfathering' clause which effectively legitimizes any and every provision appearing in a state plan in 1972.
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Erickson
(4×)
See State v. Januszewski, 182 Conn. 142, 170-75 , 438 A.2d 679 (1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S. Ct. 3159 , 69 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Harper, No. Cr99-285279 (May 16, 2000)
Miranda v. Arizona, supra; see State v. Januszewski, 182 Conn. 142 , 158 , 438 A.2d 679 (1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S.Ct. 3159 , 69 L.Ed. 1005 (1981)." State v. Brown, supra, 199 Conn. 52 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Williams
(2×)
Custodial interrogation is ‘questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way.’ Miranda v. Arizona, supra; see State v. Januszewski, 182 Conn. 142, 158 , 438 A.2d 679 (1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S. Ct. 3159 , 69 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Raines v. Freedom of Information Commission
(2×)
See State v. Januszewski, 182 Conn. 142, 172 , 438 A.2d 679 (1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S. Ct. 3159 , 69 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Ablamis v. Roper
See Carpenters Pension Trust v. Kronschnabel, 632 F.2d 745, 748 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S.Ct. 3159 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1004 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Ablamis v. Roper
See Carpenters Pension Trust v. Kronschnabel, 632 F.2d 745, 748 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S.Ct. 3159 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1004 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Jones
See State v. Januszewski, 182 Conn. 142, 170-74 , 438 A.2d 679 (1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S. Ct. 3159 , 69 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Sherbacow
(2×)
See State v. Januszewski, 182 Conn. 142, 167 , 438 A.2d 679 (1980), cert denied, 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S. Ct. 3159 , 69 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Vaughn
(2×)
See State v. Januszewski, 182 Conn. 142, 169 , 438 A.2d 679 (1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S. Ct. 3159 , 69 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lizotte
(2×)
See State v. Januszewski, 182 Conn. 142, 149 , 438 A.2d 679 (1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 922 , 101 S. Ct. 3159 , 69 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Robins
See State v. Castillo, 389 So.2d 1307 (La.1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S.Ct. 3159 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1004 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carriker v. Carriker
See Carpenters Pension Trust v. Kronschnabel, 632 F.2d 745 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S.Ct. 3159 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1004 (1981); Operating Engineers, Local #428 Pension Trust Fund v. Zarhborsky, 650 F.2d 196 (9th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Brown
(2×)
Custodial interrogation is “questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way.” Miranda v. Arizona, supra; see State v. Januszewski, 182 Conn. 142, 158 , 438 A.2d 679 (1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S. Ct. 3159 , 69 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Talton
(2×)
Although the defendant’s claim is based on an evidentiary ruling, making it incumbent upon him to demonstrate the harmfulness of the error; see State v. Januszewski, 182 Conn. 142, 174 , 438 A.2d 679 (1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S. Ct. 3159 , 69 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
California Chamber of Commerce v. Simpson
See Carpenters Pension Trust v. Kronschnabel, 460 F.Supp. 978, 981 (C.D.Cal.1978), aff'd, 632 F.2d 745 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S.Ct. 3159 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1004 (1981); Azzaro v. Harnett, 414 F.Supp. 473, 474-75 (S.D.N.Y.1976), aff'd, 553 F.2d 93 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jones
(2×)
Compare State v. Januszewski, 182 Conn. 142, 170 , 438 A.2d 679 (1980) (affirming grant of in camera review of police officer’s personnel file to verify knowledge, based on information and belief, that officer was subject of disciplinary actions prior to incident giving rise to prosecution), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S. Ct. 3159 , 69 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Mikolinski
(2×)
We judge the permissibility of a particular law enforcement practice by balancing its intrusion on the individual’s interests against its promotion of legitimate state governmental interests, and examine the intrusion to determine whether it is the minimum search necessary under the circumstances.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Wilkins, supra, 240 Conn. 503 ; see also State v. Januszewski, 182 Conn. 142, 148-49 , 438 A.2d 679 (1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S. Ct. 3159 , 69 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
First Selectman v. State Freedom of Inf., No. Cv00 0501055 (Nov. 28, 2000)
(2×)
See Hartford v. Freedom of Information Commission , 201 Conn. 421 , 431 (1986); Maher v. Freedom of Information Commission , 192 Conn. 310 , 315 (1984); Board of Police Commissioners v. Freedom of Information Commission , 192 Conn. 183 , 188 (1984); Wilson v. Freedom of Information Commission , 181 Conn. 324 , 329 (1980); see also State v. Januszewski , 182 Conn. 142 , 170-71 (1980), cert denied, 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S.Ct. 3159 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1005 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lipscomb
(2×)
Compare State v. Januszewski, 182 Conn. 142, 149-50 , 438 A.2d 679 (1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S. Ct. 3159 , 69 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Harris
(2×)
“Police officers . . . are not required to administer Miranda warnings every time they ask questions at police headquarters even if the person interrogated is a suspect in a crime.” State v. Pittman, supra, 209 Conn. 607 ; see also State v. Januszewski, 182 Conn. 142, 159 , 438 A.2d 679 (1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S. Ct. 3159 , 69 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Oquendo
(2×)
See State v. Cofield, 220 Conn. 38, 45 , 595 A.2d 1349 (1991), citing Terry v. Ohio, supra, 21 ; see also State v. Januszewski, 182 Conn. 142, 148-49 , 438 A.2d 679 (1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S. Ct. 3159 , 69 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Pittman
See also, State v. Castillo, 389 So.2d 1307 (La.1980), cert. denied, Castillo v. Louisiana, 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S.Ct. 3159 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1004 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ober
(2×)
Accordingly, the trial court correctly concluded that the defendant had failed to meet his burden of introducing “some substantial evidence tending to prove his drug dependency.” State v. Luca, 19 Conn. App. 688, 671 , 563 A.2d 752 (1989); see also State v. Januszewski, 182 Conn. 142, 169 , 438 A.2d 679 (1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S. Ct. 3159 , 69 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commissioner of Consumer Protection v. Freedom of Information Commission
(2×)
See also State v. Januszewski, 182 Conn. 142, 170-71 , 438 A.2d 679 (1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S. Ct. 3159 , 69 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of New Haven v. Freedom of Information Commission
(2×)
See Hartford v. Freedom of Information Commission, 201 Conn. 421, 431 , 518 A.2d 49 (1986); Maher v. Freedom of Information Commission, 192 Conn. 310, 315 , 472 A.2d 321 (1984); Board of Police Commissioners v. Freedom of Information Commission, 192 Conn. 183,188 , 470 A.2d 1209 (1984); Wilson v. Freedom of Information Commission, 328-29, 341; see also State v. Januszewski, 182 Conn. 142, 170-71 , 438 A.2d 679 (1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S. Ct. 3159 , 69 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Scott
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Januszewski, 182 Conn. 142, 165-66 , 438 A.2d 679 (1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S. Ct. 3159 , 69 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re John C.
No. 80-6631.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jul 2, 1981.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Eighth Circuit (4) · Supreme Court of Connecticut (4) · Supreme Court of Louisiana (1)
Sup. Ct. R. I. Certiorari denied.