green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.2 score
“it is well established law that a government official does not engage in a search within the meaning of the fourth amendment if he observes incriminating evidence from a place where he has a right to be.”
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. McArthur
it is well established law that a government official does not engage in a search within the meaning of the fourth amendment if he observes incriminating evidence from a place where he has a right to be.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WILLIAM MULDERIG
We have held that “an in camera inspection by a district judge is a reasonable procedure and is protective of the defendant’s rights.” United States v. Killian, 639 F.2d 206, 210 (5th Cir. Unit A), cert. denied sub nom., Brunk v. United States, 451 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 3014 , 69 L.Ed.2d 394 5 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marcus
See U.S. v. Killian, 639 F.2d 206 (5th Cir.1981), cert. den., 451 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 3014 , 69 L.Ed.2d 394 (1981); U.S. v. Durham, 475 F.2d 208 (7th Cir.1973); U.S. v. Thomas, 474 F.2d 110 (10th Cir.1973), cert. den., 412 U.S. 932 , 93 S.Ct. 2758 , 37 L.Ed.2d 160 (1973). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nicanor Almeida Iribe
See United States v. Killian, 639 F.2d 206, 211 (5th Cir. Unit A), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 3014 , 69 L.Ed.2d 394 (1981) (stating that no illegal activity occurred where the arrested person freely consented to a search of his office and attache case).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Scozzafava
See United States v. Killian, 639 F.2d 206 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 3014 , 69 L.Ed.2d 394 (1981); United States v. Durham, 475 F.2d 208 (7th Cir.1973); United States v. Thomas, 474 F.2d 110 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 932 , 93 S.Ct. 2758 , 37 L.Ed.2d 160 (1973). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Christopher Barry Greer, Daniel Alvis Wood, Sean Christian Tarrant, Michael Lewis Lawrence, and Jon Lance Jordan
See United States v. Killian, 639 F.2d 206, 211 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 3014 , 69 L.Ed.2d 394 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pedro Angel Gomez
See United States v. Killian, 639 F.2d 206, 211 (5th Cir. Unit A March 1981) (admission of evidence seized after defendant’s arrest admissible), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 3014 , 69 L.Ed.2d 394 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mmr Corporation (La) and James B. Rutland
See United States v. Killian, 639 F.2d 206, 208-09 (5th Cir. Unit A), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 3014 , 69 L.Ed.2d 394 (1981); see also United States v. Finestone, 816 F.2d 583, 589 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 948 , 108 S.Ct. 338 , 98 L.Ed.2d 365 (1987); United States v. Walker, 796 F.2d 43, 49 (4th Cir.1986); United States v. Borelli, 336 F.2d 376, 388 (2d Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 960 , 85 S.Ct. 647 , 13 L.Ed.2d 555 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hammad
United States v. Thomas, 474 F.2d 110, 112 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 932 , 93 S.Ct. 2758 , 37 L.Ed.2d 160 (1973); accord United States v. Killian, 639 F.2d 206, 210 (5th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Brunk v. United States, 451 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 3014 , 69 L.Ed.2d 394 (1981); United States v. Howard, 426 F.Supp. 1067, 1071 (W.D.N.Y.1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Kenneth Griffin v. Louie L. Wainwright
See United States v. Killian, 639 F.2d 206, 210 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 3014 , 69 L.Ed.2d 394 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Al Leichtman, Salvatore Lombardo, United States of America v. Paul Lombardo, United States of America v. Estanley Neil
As we have previously indicated, “evidence of an uncharged offense arising out of the same transaction or series of transactions as the charged offense is not an ‘extrinsic’ offense within the meaning of Rule 404(b).” U.S. v. Kloock, 652 F.2d 492, 494 (5th Cir. 1981) (Unit B); see U.S. v. Killian, 639 F.2d 206, 211 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 3014 , 69 L.Ed.2d 394 (1981); U.S. v. Aleman, 592 F.2d 881, 885 (5th Cir.1979); see also U.S. v. McCrary, 699 F.2d 1308, 1311 (11th Cir.1983) (“other crime” evidence admissible if “inextricably intertwined with the ev…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Dowell
See United States v. Wright, 641 F.2d 602 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 3014 , 69 L.Ed.2d 394 (1981) and United States v. Carwell, 491 F.2d 1334 (8th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 949 , 94 S.Ct. 3076 , 41 L.Ed.2d 669 (1974), both upholding the inadvertent seizure of guns during the execution of search warrants describing other items, where the defendants were known convicted felons, and the guns constituted evidence of possession of firearms by convicted felons.
cited
Cited "see"
Jack Carlton House v. Charles Balkcom, Warden, Georgia State Prison
See United States v. Killian, 639 F.2d 206, 210 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 3014 , 69 L.Ed.2d 394 (1981); Mays v. Balkcom, 631 F.2d 48, 52, n. 1 (5th Cir.1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Marshall A. Kett v. United States
See United States v. Killian, 639 F.2d 206, 210 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 3014 , 69 L.Ed.2d 394 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ammar
See United States v. Killian, 639 F.2d 206, 209 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 3014 , 69 L.Ed.2d 394 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ammar
See United States v. Killian, 639 F.2d 206, 209 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 3014 , 69 L.Ed.2d 394 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Lewis C. Wallace v. A.L. Lockhart, Director of Arkansas Department of Corrections
See Comer, 674 F.2d at 734 , citing Cox v. Wyrick, 642 F.2d 222, 226-27 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 3013 , 69 L.Ed.2d 394 (1981); see also Reynolds, 574 F.2d at 979 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Ford v. Strickland
See United States v. Killian, 639 F.2d 206, 210 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 3014 , 69 L.Ed.2d 394 (1981). 111 The judgment denying habeas corpus relief is AFFIRMED, but the case is REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings as set forth in the per curiam opinion of the Court. 112 GODBOLD, Chief Judge, joined by CLARK, Circuit Judge, except as to the concurrence in Part V of the majority opinion, dissenting in part and specially concurring in part: 113 I concur in Parts IV, V, VI and VII of the majority's opinion.
cited
Cited "see"
Ford v. Strickland
See United States v. Killian, 639 F.2d 206, 210 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 3014 , 69 L.Ed.2d 394 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Donald Eugene Ryans D/B/A Ryans Moving & Storage and Westside Movers
See United States v. Thomas, 474 F.2d 110, 112 (10th Cir.) (custodial, post-arrest interview), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 932 , 93 S.Ct. 2758 , 37 L.Ed.2d 160 (1973); see also United States v. Killian, 639 F.2d 206, 210 (5th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 3014 , 69 L.Ed.2d 394 (1981); United States v. Durham, 475 F.2d 208, 211 (7th Cir.1973) (custodial, pre-indictment interview of a defendant in the absence of retained counsel “raise[s] ethical questions” under DR 7-104(A)(l)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Nick Arcobasso
See United States v. Jones, supra, 635 F.2d at 1358-59 (observations of guns plainly evident in apartment not suppressed where officers were aware that Jones rented apartment and had prior felony conviction but had no information that Jones had fired shots or had entered apartment); see also United States v. Wright, 641 F.2d 602, 606 (8th Cir.) (considering collective knowledge of officers on the scene), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 3014 , 69 L.Ed.2d 394 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Verna Lee Walker
See id. at 365 , 101 S.Ct. at 668 (requiring a showing of “demonstrable prejudice, or substantial threat thereof”); see also United States v. Killian, 639 F.2d 206, 210 (5th Cir.Unit A Mar.1981) (no prejudice shown where statements obtained without counsel were not used at trial), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 3014 , 69 L.Ed.2d 394 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bernard Brooks
U. S. v. Gonzalez, 661 F.2d *629 488, 493-94 (5th Cir. 1981); U. S. v. Kloock, 652 F.2d 492, 493, 494 (5th Cir. 1981); U. S. v. Aleman, 592 F.2d 881, 885 (5th Cir. 1979); see also U. S. v. Killian, 639 F.2d 206, 211 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 3014 , 69 L.Ed.2d 394 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McCaskill
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 80-6571.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 26, 1981.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Utah (1)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.