green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
7.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1989 ·
…it does not require a constitutional scholar to conclude that a nude search of a thirteen-year-old child is an invasion of constitutional rights of some magnitude. more than that: it is a violation of any known principle of human dignity.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Good v. Dauphin County Social Services For Children And Youth
it does not require a constitutional scholar to conclude that a nude search of a thirteen-year-old child is an invasion of constitutional rights of some magnitude. more than that: it is a violation of any known principle of human dignity.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Good v. Dauphin County Social Services for Children & Youth
it does not require a constitutional scholar to conclude that a nude search of a thirteen-year-old child is an invasion of constitutional rights of some magnitude. more than that: it is a violation of any known principle of human dignity.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Burnett v. Municipality of Anchorage
no marijuana or other drugs were found in plaintiffs possession, although it was later discovered that plaintiff had been playing with one of her dogs that morning of the search and that dog was in heat.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jenkins v. Talladega City Board Of Education
See Doe v. Renfrow, 631 F.2d 91, 92-93 (CA7 1980) ("It does not require a constitutional scholar to conclude that a nude search of a 13-year-old child is an invasion of constitutional rights of some magnitude"), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1022 , 101 S.Ct. 3015 , 69 L.Ed.2d 395 (1981); Bellnier v. Lund, 438 F.Supp. 47 (NDNY 1977); People v. D., 34 N.Y.2d 483 , 358 N.Y.S.2d 403 , 315 N.E.2d 466 (1974); M.J. v. State, 399 So.2d 996 (Fla.App.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jenkins v. Talladega City Bd. of Ed
See Doe v. Renfrow, 631 F.2d 91, 92-93 (CA7 1980) ("It does not require a constitutional scholar to conclude that a nude search of a 13-year-old child is an invasion of constitutional rights of some magnitude"), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1022 , 101 S.Ct. 3015 , 69 L.Ed.2d 395 (1981); Bellnier v. Lund, 438 F.Supp. 47 (NDNY 1977); People v. D., 34 N.Y.2d 483 , 358 N.Y.S.2d 403 , 315 N.E.2d 466 (1974); M.J. v. State, 399 So.2d 996 (Fla.App.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jenkins v. Talladega City Board of Education
See Doe v. Renfrow, 631 F.2d 91, 92-93 (CA7 1980) ("It does not require a constitutional scholar to conclude that a nude search of a 13-year-old child is an invasion of constitutional rights of some magnitude”), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1022 , 101 S.Ct. 3015 , 69 L.Ed.2d 395 (1981); Bellnier v. Lund, 438 F.Supp. 47 (NDNY 1977); People v. D., 34 N.Y.2d 483 , 358 N.Y.S.2d 403 , 315 N.E.2d 466 (1974); M.J. v. State, 399 So.2d 996 (Fla.App.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Florez
See Doe v. Renfrow, 475 F.Supp. 1012 (N.D.Ind.1979), aff'd in part, 631 F.2d 91 (7th Cir.1980), reh’g denied, 635 F.2d 582 (7th Cir.1980) cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1022 , 101 S.Ct. 3015 , 69 L.Ed.2d 395 (1981) (no drugs found on thirty-three (33) out of fifty (50) junior high and high school students to which narcotics dogs alerted); United States v. Brown, 731 F.2d 1491 , modified, 743 F.2d 1505 , reh’g denied, 749 F.2d 733 (11th Cir. 1984) (no drugs found after narcotics dog alerted to luggage at airport) 18 ; United States v. Young, 745 F.2d 733 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 ,…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dario Dicesare, United States of America v. Kathleen Flannery, United States of America v. Jose Marin
See Doe v. Renfrow, 451 U.S. 1022 , 101 S.Ct. 3015 , 69 L.Ed.2d 395 (1981) (Brennan, J., dissenting from denial of certiora-ri).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bilbrey v. Brown
Therefore, we must "balanc[e] the need to search against the invasion which the search entails." Camara, 387 U.S. at 537 , 87 S.Ct. at 1735 ; see Doe v. Renfrow, 631 F.2d 91 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1022 , 101 S.Ct. 3015 , 69 L.Ed.2d 395 (1981) (Brennan, J., dissenting); M.M. v. Anker, 477 F.Supp. 837 (E.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 607 F.2d 588 (2d Cir.1979). 25 Viewed in a light most favorable to the appellees, the evidence purportedly supporting the immunity verdict is as follows.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bilbrey ex rel. Bilbrey v. Brown
Therefore, we must “balanc[e] the need to search against the invasion which the search entails.” Camara, 387 U.S. at 537 , 87 S.Ct. at 1735 ; see Doe v. Renfrow, 631 F.2d 91 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1022 , 101 S.Ct. 3015 , 69 L.Ed.2d 395 (1981) (Brennan, J., dissenting); M.M. v. Anker, 477 F.Supp. 837 (E.D.N.Y.), aff 'd, 607 F.2d 588 (2d Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Christopher Beale
See Doe v. Renfrow, 451 U.S. 1022 , 1026 n. 4, 101 S.Ct. 3015 , 3018 n. 4, 69 L.Ed.2d 395 (Brennan, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari) (noting that cases allowing dog sniffs "involved the sniffing of inanimate and unattended objects”) (emphasis added); 1 W.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Flores v. Meese
See, e.g., Doe v. Renfroe, 631 F.2d 91, 92-93 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1022 , 101 S.Ct. 3015 , 69 L.Ed.2d 395 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pooley v. State
Louis U.L.J. 119, 131-33 (1979); see also Doe v. Renfrow, 451 U.S. 1022 , 101 S.Ct. 3015 , 69 L.Ed.2d 395 (1981) (Brennan, J„ dissenting from denial of certiorari); Doe v. Renfrow, 631 F.2d 91, 93 (7th Cir. 1980) (Swygert, J., dissenting from denial of rehearing). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School District
Louis U.L.J. 119, 131-33 (1979); see also Doe v. Renfrow, 451 U.S. 1022 , 101 S.Ct. 3015 , 69 L.Ed.2d 395 (1981) (Brennan, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari); Doe v. Renfrow, 631 F.2d 91, 93 (7th Cir. 1980) (Swygert, J., dissenting from denial of rehearing).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Horton ex rel. Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School District
Louis U.L.J. 119, 131-33 (1979); see also Doe v. Renfrow, 451 U.S. 1022 , 101 S.Ct. 3015 , 69 L.Ed.2d 395 (1981) (Brennan, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari); Doe v. Renfrow, 631 F.2d 91, 93 (7th Cir. 1980) (Swygert, J., dissenting from denial of rehearing).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Mayberry
(2×)
Cir.1974) 498 F.2d 748, 749 [bus terminal]; see also Doe v. Renfrow (7th Cir.1980) 631 F.2d 91 , rehg. den. (1980) 635 F.2d 582 , cert. den. 451 U.S. 1022 [ 69 L.Ed.2d 395 , 101 S.Ct. 3015 ] [high school]; United States v. Solis (9th Cir.1976) 536 F.2d 880, 882 [semitrailer]; Annot. (1977) 31 A.L.R.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thompson, Secretary, Department of Social and Health Services of Washington
v.
Berry
v.
Berry
No. 80-456.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 26, 1981.
Cited by 71 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (2) · D. Alaska (1)
Sup. Ct. Wash. Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in jorma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.